Maybe there should ve something diffrent there for females. I mean, back in the middel ages, no female was a knight, so it kinda dosnt make sense. What do you guys think?
Well maybe you can make the seperate set of ranks, but then girls can choose between the two? I mean it's not like it's the end of the world if a girl is a knight, as Carlie said, it doesn't have to be accurate, but because, I guess, it isn't entirely accurate an alternative could be made?
Yay, I reached 30,000 points in meh last post! <.<
There's nothing wrong with having a female knight and thre's nothing wrong with the ranking system as it is. there's not need to split the ranking system any further just to differentiate between males and females. "It's the differences, of which there are none, that makes the sameness exceptional."
hmmmm..... i think your right. If there werent ever girl nights in real life, girls should be diferent from guys. thats why we are called make and female. And girl and guy.
Not to be demeaning to the lower-ranked users, but that's why the first three ranks of the set are the same; you don't see one's importance until they take off the helm and wear the hats. Back then, knight was the final step to show the king that they were important people, and those that showed the king that were important, they became his aides, and became important people. That being said, that's why the hats are different but not the helmets, because the user hasn't become active yet; granted that few knights and even fewer squires have showed promise. It's just all extra work in my thoughts, but nothing to get your heads jumbled about. It just gives you extra motivation to get more active in AG (or spam, which is the dark side)!
