Forums → Support Forum → Should girls not have knight?

I guess I'm not exactly a teen myself either, I shouldn't go ratting off...


But yeah, there is no need for another set of ranks.

Off-topic: Cheese Hamburgers!

Yes but who said we all had to go warrior on it???

And Note: My 'optional' suggestion, at the top of it in the very first sentence of the suggestion's paragraph, I said something like '...when a lot of people start to complain, then we could make the optional set of ranks...'. Not that they have to make it right now, because what's the point of making them when only one or two people out of 5.000+ have no problem, and possibly even love to be a knight and such?

So what do all of these suggestions point to?

This is a no-no!

exactly.
however, creating new ranks, like higher ranks would be more beneficial than optional ranks for females :S

& Yeah raptor, maybe if people do complain they'd change it in time, but as you said, no need for it now.
We're happy being knights :P

however, creating new ranks, like higher ranks would be more beneficial than optional ranks for females :S

it really does not matter, its not really that important...

Yeah, agreed on that. If people begin to gain AG points and more people move up ranks, then maybe new ranks could be considered.

This is a no-no! For now =)

Why not a male fanatical historial part of the Mens book club who happen to support womens role in history? :P
Nah, kidding obviously.

i actually just got moved up to knight. woot.

nice jpb, I remember when I first became a knight...
*sobs* good times, goood times..

Lmao. Just checked. Youre well past knight now :P

I think the knight should be out and there should be a daughter then knight.

like daughter as the rank before?

Hey, Jeffery, you shouldn't hog the forums and post after whenever someone else posts, I did that before, and people didn't like it.

And no, daughter would not work...