Maybe there should ve something diffrent there for females. I mean, back in the middel ages, no female was a knight, so it kinda dosnt make sense. What do you guys think?
Why not a male fanatical historial part of the Mens book club who happen to support womens role in history? :P
A Woman's Book club is far more effective.
And 'Forum Hogging' isn't necessarily a bad thing, it's just when it's a debate or discussion it is, it's a 'i wanna be included too!' thing, we're all whiny and want attention =)
Ok, just did some resurch with the internet, and girls could be neither serf, nor knight. A serf was a knight in traning, who was learning the ways of fighting and such. A knight was a higher form of serf, were they got onto the feild and fought with opther lords over bits of land. Now when the feaudilism system was invented lords owned large plots of land which they gave to serf, (who worked for protection) and squires and knight protected them. Dukes were uselly the kings addvisros, and wwell........every one knows about kings and princess and such. So it is inacurate to make females knights, when they would never have been. If you look at the american revolution or something, no women fought, and it is the same into history.
Thanks for listening to my history lesson. lol
I know it is not a big deal, but just something to think about.
Well, women were higher than men a long time ago, because they were the source of life so should not be fighting. Later woomen were seen as a weaker sex, and thus wuld not be worth anything. But just remember all the female warriors through legends. The valkyries being the godesses who came and picked up the fallen soldiers in Norse mythology were exelent fighters. Amazones were known as fierce fighters too. And all probably know one story or another about women being dressed like me and did their jobs good, even better than men, until they were found out.
