ForumsWEPR9/11 - Terrorist, or Inside Job?

47 7844
ZachCraft
offline
ZachCraft
108 posts
Nomad

Well, I have compiled a little list, if you will, as to why (in my opinion) 9/11 was an inside job. Please discuss YOUR opinions on this topic if you would like to as well.


â¢The buildings were designed specifically for airplane attacks; they could still stand from the heaviest airplane at that time, even after being hit from multiple angles. Note: This is WITH full fuel.

â¢World Trade Center 7 was destroyed, although no plane hit it.

â¢There was molten metal 5 weeks after the towers collapsed.

â¢The towers collapsed in total free fall speed, encountering absolutely no resistance from the floors below or the giant steel core.

â¢The core was completely destroyed, even if the floors had collapsed around it, it should have been standing.

â¢There were small explosions-evident of the explosions coming out of windows-before the floors were even close to one another.

â¢Witnesses that day reported hearing several loud explosions before the planes even hit.*

â¢The steel the building was made out of burns at 2450° farrenheit.. The hottest recorded open fire was 1450° farrenheit.

*This would be assumed as a sonic boom, which only occurs when something is faster than the speed of sound (717 MPH), where the 747 plane's max speed is 560-600 MPH.

Additional notes: Something that can burn through the steel would be thermite/thermate, an extremely hot incendinary, that could easily burn through the steel. They would have been planted at the base of the towers, during the confusion of the plane crashes.

Please, if you'd like to, respond with your opinion on why / why not these are true, false, or anything else on this topic.

  • 47 Replies
opentotruth
offline
opentotruth
473 posts
Peasant

monster

ZachCraft
offline
ZachCraft
108 posts
Nomad

Indeed.

LiL_GaNgSta_BlAzE
offline
LiL_GaNgSta_BlAzE
2,269 posts
Jester

Yeah it makes sense and there are other reasons to belive it was an inside job, but it's olny opinion, you never know!

Armed_Blade
offline
Armed_Blade
1,492 posts
Shepherd

True, they said there were bombs on the side? Also, Sonic Boom's speed is one thing, but with the Boeings Velocity and burned out Jet engines. [Like when you drive a car and that thing going from 1-8 goes to 8 and you burn your egine]. Thats was the plane. Therefor, not only was it burning a massivly overriding amount of fuel, its velocity and out of controll smash probably did make it faster, with more speed.

Though, I do believe there was more to it. Even a boeing should not be able to ram into a building, its idiocracy to tihnk so. Though, if the Gov. knows anything we won't find out for 30 years.

ZachCraft
offline
ZachCraft
108 posts
Nomad

Additional: The planes did NOT have full fuel, as they traveled long distances, they had half to a quarter left of fuel, so saying it was the fire from the explosion that made the towers fall is OUT OF THE QUESTION.

Strategy_guy
offline
Strategy_guy
290 posts
Nomad

It coud've just be the explosion...no one ever thinks of the easy explonation...it could've also been that they hit a area where the foundation was weak causeing a ripple effect thourgh the building weaking the rest of the foundation.

Asherlee
offline
Asherlee
5,001 posts
Shepherd

I've done a little research myself on the subject. I read that not long before the towers fell they were bought by this guy (I'll get the name and source in a bit). About 2 weeks before the towers fell he took out a billion dollar anti-terrorist insurance policy for the towers.

(I've done a horrible job explaining that because I didn't sleep last night).

But I find that to be rather interesting. There are a lot of things that point to the idea that it was an inside job. But I doubt we will ever truly know.

I do know for a fact that some of the information released by the government were lies. I have several relatives that are government employees that were involved in 9/11's aftermath.

Brigadier
offline
Brigadier
51 posts
Nomad

I personally don't know what to think of 9/11.

However I don't believe it was an inside job. For example, the Titanic was supposed to be an impenetrable ship that should never have sunk. Quite literally, 1000+ things had to go right for that monster of a ship to sink.

Maybe this is what happened with the twin towers. Maybe 1000+ things just went the right way and thats how they crashed. There is no proof which way it went down. But I have faith enough in my country to think that they wouldn't kill hundreds of innocent civilians for money. But you never can no, Money does horrible things to people.

ciscokid
offline
ciscokid
72 posts
Nomad

The biggest reason why I don't beleive it was inside job was this, I don't think its possible for some to have so little consious that they would kill thousands of people just for money. The only being I could think of that would do that would probably (if he is real) be Satan.

Asherlee
offline
Asherlee
5,001 posts
Shepherd

Brigadier, you do bring a great point.

Ciscokid, I wouldn't underestimate the lack of a conscience when it comes to rich and greedy people. Hell, look at what Enron did.

ZachCraft
offline
ZachCraft
108 posts
Nomad

cisco; Tianenmen Square, look at that. It is very similar to the 'I don't tink it's possible for some to have so little consious that they would kill thousands...'. And, the planes did not have enough fuel to cause a massive explosion to cause an entire tower to fall, let alone two. And thirdly, WTC 7 was NOT hit, but collapsed INWARD on itself, which is exactly what happens in controlled demolitions.

Megamickel
offline
Megamickel
902 posts
Peasant

So you want me to believe that what members of my family are fighting for (what I would be fighting for if not for my damned waistline >_&gt is a complete and total lie by the government? That offends me on so many levels... No. I'm leaving this thread. Continue to wallow in your fear mongering.

Asherlee
offline
Asherlee
5,001 posts
Shepherd

Isn't it debatable about why we are really in Iraq in the first place though? I didn't think it was purely because of terrorism.

ZachCraft
offline
ZachCraft
108 posts
Nomad

Mega, it was your choice to open this thread in the first place, had you known the name of it. And when does the government EVER tell the full truth of a war? And Asher, my thoughts on the reason for the war is purely oil.

Megamickel
offline
Megamickel
902 posts
Peasant

Talking about Afghanistan, not Iraq. There's still troops there, still a war going on, didn't you know?

Showing 1-15 of 47