well if any of u r familiar with the law of conservation and mass, then u know that it states that matter cannot be created from nothing, or completely destroyed. so evolutionists say this, then turn around and say the big bang created the universe as we know it. WTF!!?!?!?!the universe went from non existent to existent in a fraction of a nanosecond! and where did the bigbang come from? nothing? nope, because if the law of conservation and mass is true, then the bigbang isnt. simple...
I suppose in some ways it is eaiser to beleive but from ascientific stand point it is a little more difficult to beleive that some being appered, with ultimate power and was perfect, and began to make the universe. It is some what easier, I suppose, to beleive that a few dust particles, still waiting on how that got there, or engery formed into a explosive ball and from that life was formed.
As I said I am not here to change beleifs but to give facts and then, in some points, my own opinon.
Today just wouldn't be a day without a crazed christian stating his belifs without facts to back it up. Please sat something after you say what you beleive in to back it up. To anailiator: that beleif of guided evolution is really starting to take hold in the christian faith. I'm glad that christians are begining to ease of the extreme faith thing and start to relize that science and faith can exsit together.
God <b>HAS</b> to exist, because something had to create the big bang!
And if you are thinking about saying "But who created God?" or "How did God get there?" the answer is: He has always been there! He is Alpha, Omega, Begging and End!
Ooh, here's a perfect time to link to a handy reminder (it's really the post just above, yes, that really big long post that quotes Daniel McNeely).
As Leon's implicitly conceded, God does not answer the question of a beginning (also see beginning of time? thread)...but God forms an answer to it, provided you assume that you require an answer.
@Strategy_Guy: this is true, but the downside is that various compromises generate other somewhat misleading suggestions in their own right, such as Intelligent Design (which I find to be somewhat of a chimera, as would be expected of its origins).
The worrying part is that people are arguing that ID be taught "as a credible theory" alongside evolution. I'm not saying that school education should be censored to the extent that only secular agenda is allowed, but in raising awareness of such things as ID, and the creation/evolution debate, should require some degree of context (this applies to teaching evolution, too). That's only responsible.
all of you christians should believe in big bang as it is even mentioned in the bible you might ask where? does the phrase "let there be light" ring a bell? we just gave it a scientific name i.e. big bang
