OHHHHHHHHHHHH, never mind. Thanks Moe, didn't see that. Guess I should never jump to conclusions. SORRY ARMED_BLADE!!!!
Haha that's fine. You have no idea how close I was to raging
But no hard feelings, Zakyman.
ADULTS (or educated youth) WILL know the issues with this (fat etc.) and will be able to conciously CHOOSE what they want. Kids can't choose.
As, for Subway - aren't YOU choosing EXACTLY what will be in your sandwich in Subway?
I believe kids can choose. It depends on parental control. I understand that parents aren't supposed to be demi-gods to children, but when my little sister was seven years old, 7, she was getting a little flabby and she told my mom to bring in some veggies. Kids can chose when they know wtf is going on.
Now of course if a kid see's "I'm lovin it" all the time they would wanna love some, too. I think it is up to parents to stop that or tell them what ads are really for. At a young age my dad told me ads don't really prove anything they're just trying to get you to do something. He also gave me a good explanation -- he asked if I've ever gotten a burger like the one I see on the ads.
And I suppose the choosability of Subway is what makes it such a favorable contender. I know people that eat very healthy that go there, as well as people that like to mash up the fatty bread and all the ranches.
Let's not forget that parents have everything at their disposal to find out whether or not the food can be deemed nutritional.
Very true. We should not be unfair and take away the televising ability of a corporation because people are stupid.
Also, how on earth would you deem what channels/in what style would the ads be ranked away from this age group?
And what is scarier is that this could start a very social precedent of blocking out issues in society in our media, which is so not what this nation has done for... ever.
Look, while they may have had a point about really little kids the fact that they go up to 17 is just too patronizing for them to have a point. I am 12 and I reserve the right to choose what to eat with or without advertising. And they say it takes another 5 years to do this. I don't know what kind of an idiot came up with that age group.
Yeah honestly, only a few good ads ever really attracted me towards barely thinking about something after the age of like... 11.
Anyways...eating fast food won't harm you unless you consume it a LOT,
I'm not so sure that's true. Even once every few days can be pretty detrimental. It depends on what you mean by 'fat' though. A lot of people, without even realizing it, usually live on the border of their calorie intake limit. So when they eat some stuff, they start gaining weight quick.
Now obviously, to get obese, it takes some work, but lets face it, continuously eating it not only leads to more fat overall, and it keeps people chubby without much work.
It also gives people a thought that 'hmm, I' not obese yet, and I eat so much. A little more wont' kill'. So I think the best way to go about it is to see it as a source for when you're low on cash or on the road or haven't had it in a while.
And, I understand that some of the poor might usually rely on this low income food -- but I think that in it's own is perfectly acceptable.
Still, though I don't like fatties when they're fatties out of laziness, I think it's unfair and politically incorrect to stop advertisements.
And seriously... 17, wtf.