With Puma Punku are you basically just doing what we see many theists do with their religion? Your argument seems to be "We don't know how these things were made, so it was aliens."
Ok. Wow. That shedded some light on me. But maybe your right. Still its pretty crazy the architecture. I mean we can only wonder how they built it. Since they didn't have electricity or machines. Wait... The Greeks had some type of mechanism. I think it was called uhh Antikythera. Anyhow, here's the link:
Something to keep in mind, humans intellect has remained pretty much the same from when these structures were made till now. What has changed is our collective knowledge. Our individual problem solving skills and ability to reason has relatively remained.
Too many pages, so sorry if what I say was already said =X
Well, the Universe got no limits, it's infinite. So there is an infinite of Worlds, right ? So we got an infite of probability that Aliens exist. So they exist !
I'm not sure that my demonstration is true, but this make me believe that they should exist somewhere ^_^
I'm guessing bacteria on planets are demons too then
"I think the movie "Thor" can come into play here. Some people call it "magic" and some people call it "science." In my world they are one and the same." ...that was paraphrased of course.
...and if you look at it that way... then I guess so.
Wrong, the amount of matter in the universe is finite not infinite. However there is still enough for about 200 billion galaxies. Our galaxy alone contains 200-400 billion stars. So take that number and times it by 200 billion.
I'm sure to a lot of nations English sounds like the weirdest thing ever.
thats why i find it funny when some1 gets mad over some1's english spelling on i-net xD it's shows narrow mindness. because they think evry1 can speak 100% good english xD
Wrong, the amount of matter in the universe is finite not infinite. However there is still enough for about 200 billion galaxies. Our galaxy alone contains 200-400 billion stars. So take that number and times it by 200 billion.
400,000,000,000*200,000,000,000=8.0e22 or 80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 80 sextillion.
That's your high range so you were close with your estimation. According to Wiki, it's estimated that 70 sextillion stars are within the range of our telescopes as of 2003.
If the "big bang", a single occurrence at the beginning of the universe (according to some theories) was the only time matter and energy were put out into the universe and the source has stopped putting stuff into the universe, then there is only that matter that was placed into the universe. Everything is expanding out from the beginning area kinda like water from a hose. Only a certain amount of water poured out from the hose. I'm not sure about the volume, however. Some say that even the volume is finite. I'm just not sure that I see that. I can just see it all expanding away from itself till you can't see any other stars (or they're all dead) and it staying that way. Some say that universe can crash in on itself... but I'm just not able to fathom why.
If the "big bang", a single occurrence at the beginning of the universe (according to some theories) was the only time matter and energy were put out into the universe and the source has stopped putting stuff into the universe, then there is only that matter that was placed into the universe. Everything is expanding out from the beginning area kinda like water from a hose.
Not exactly. First off all the matter/energy would have already been here at the Big Bang. New energy wouldn't have been pouring in at that point. There is a hypothesis of the energy currently here pouring in from another universe forming the singularity the Big Bang started from. Second everything isn't expanding from a single point. Think of it more like being on the surface of an inflating balloon. From this perspective there isn't any point on that surface that you could point to and say "we are expanding from there".
atm nasa sientists are observing a giant red "cloud" about 3000 light years away. (cloud being as big as 4 light years) that maybe is creating new stars (suns) if this seem to be true. then the "big bang" theory is not valid anymore.
atm nasa sientists are observing a giant red "cloud" about 3000 light years away. (cloud being as big as 4 light years) that maybe is creating new stars (suns) if this seem to be true. then the "big bang" theory is not valid anymore.
Such a thing would not make the big bang theory invalid. Also do you have a source? I couldn't find anything.
