Yes shame on me for finding killing babies immoral. Bad Nurv.
First of all you take it out of context. Oh and your god promoted child slaughter, so way to follow your religion.
On a note that is NOT sarcastic, I don't care what your morals are. You are entitled to them and I will do everything in my power to make sure you keep that right. However you DO NOT have the right to force your morals upon someone else. And I will do everything in my power to defend that as well.
Evidence that homosexuality is between two guys or girls? Uhh... Evidence that it'll catch on in a few million years? You're right that probably won't happen.
No, I'm asking for one shred of evidence that legalizing gay marriage and halting the campaign of hate and bigotry against homosexuals will lead to the decline of the human race as you suggested.
Actually it is. Your stupidity and arrogance is so funny.
Umm... How am I stupid or arrogant here? I'm trying to have an educated and civil debate with you and you are resorting to name calling and insults. Yet I'm being stupid and arrogant?
And the point that I am making is that the 10 commandments state that 'thou shalt not kill'. Seems pretty clear cut to me. These were the laws of god as given to moses. Therefore they are the bedrock of the christian faith.
Either you follow the commandments or you don't. Pretty simple. Simply because the bible states elsewhere that you may kill means nothing other than the fact that the book contradicts itself.
Those were just guidelines for when you can pray in school dude.
Apparently you didn't read the other link, or the information provided on the two following links. The first link stated the facts on the case, the second was the religious people's response to the case, and the final two links gave evidence disproving the religious argument.
How many do you think are manipulated and lied to? None of course NOT.
In what respect? And I'm certain that if the manipulation of their religion condemning them to hell for having an abortion didn't stop them, I doubt any other form of manipulation would have much of an effect.
Oh well abortion violates right to life. So yeah let's drop American law document... things.
This is actually a relatively valid point, despite your usage of sarcasm in lieu of an intelligent remark. However let's take into account that the human fetus is not even conscious, aware, or capable of ANY cognizant mental capacity until after 26 weeks gestation, and less than 1% of abortions occur after 20 weeks gestation, with only ~40% of those occurring at or after 26 weeks.
So we see that half of 1% of abortions in the US occur AFTER the fetus has begun to actually 'think' or be 'conscious'. Prior to that point it is no more aware than a plant. If you want to see more evidence regarding this I posted all pertinent information in the thread Abortion V2. I suggest you check it out, or do some research on your own so you can debate from a position of knowledge and perception rather than blind obedience to a dogma you don't even fully understand.
LOL and you don't think it will be? Cause it will.
I don't know for sure, and I can't make any claims one way or another. What I can tell you is that it has been debated, delayed, edited, and discussed for going on 7 years now, when it was claimed at it's inception that it would fly through the house and senate easily.
Yeah that's totally what the Africans think. Way to be an idiot mr. walker.
Sadly it's true. And one of the less disgusting and heartwrenching ideas held by many of the African people. Here is a link to one of many places that have reported on the misconceptions and myths in Africa today:[url=http://www.matrixmasters.com/world/africa/2004_03_01_archiveafrica.html]Link Way to resort to name calling in lieu of education and intelligent reasoning.
Oh yes because communism sure brightened up the 20th century. Thanks communism!
Again. Communism has nothing to do with the debate here. You are grasping at a straw man and trying to project a position to the debate which does not have any bearing or relevance. This is nothing but an extreme diversionary tactic and serves no purpose in civil and intelligent debate.