Raze didn't say humans suck. He said we are disturbing the ''cycle'', which in part we are, such as mass deforestation, and the mass use of fossil fuels. But this is completely different from stating that eating animals is inhumane.
What You said As You May Got enraged and aggrieved as religion defines it you may much call it unnatural so why When we eat them we call it UNNATURAl why?? when a human is eated he can say something but if this same happens with a animal what he is able to say?? Can you imagine what is This???
I have absolutely no clue what you are saying here. Language barrier?
pangtongshu I AM NOT A CRITAN
Oops. Well then whichever religion you believe in, you are the only one between us three to hold that belief.
You are basiclly saying this is not creation of god or God Dosen't exsist?
Yes.
You are Pointing a finger towards a universal truth of the creator of the world the almighty god..........
There being a "creator" is not a universal truth.
They Are Not Doing The Work For What They Are Created
You are holding your entire argument on the grounds of a mere claim. Therefore, your argument holds no grounds until your claim becomes proven. For clarity sake, your claim is that a) humans were "created" and b) we have a specific job to do
If one engineer frod's with any other so the comunity of engineer are called frod if one website Frod's all websites are called frod's so if 63% of Human's are killer of HUMANITY so why 100% are not called?
If one engineer frod's with any other so the comunity of engineer are called frod if one website Frod's all websites are called frod's so if 63% of Human's are killer of HUMANITY so why 100% are not called?
Oh my where to begin...
1) What is "frod"? Google produces nothing to what you are using it as
2) If I'm thinking of the word correctly, if one engineer or website screws up, all of them are not viewed as that particular one.
3) where the hell did you get "63%"? I would like a source
If one engineer frod's with any other so the comunity of engineer are called frod if one website Frod's all websites are called frod's so if 63% of Human's are killer of HUMANITY so why 100% are not called?
Simply because it is already wrong to say that because one engineer committed fraud (assuming you meant this), the whole community can be labelled such.
While it is true that I disapprove of many things done by humans, I abhor this whole "humanz are evil!!1" thing. Why? For the simple reason that there are also good sides of humanity, and if you are unable to see these good sides, you are unable to improve humanity. All you do is rant and swear and post irrelevant pictures, but are you doing something against it? No! You're doing NOTHING. You're just sitting here cooking in your own cancerous juice of hate. I think that's really sad.
This is becoming legitimately incoherent. I don't know how you're following this conversation, pang. I see no genuine arguments in favour of the OP and I don't know if I should just lock this thread.
