Hehai (or Whatever) You Are Saying Right i am giving negative point's because of the Most point's mention in this argument and my friend's are in the side of HUMANITY i have said it that it's not about argument it's about saving Earth's Humanity..........
I don't know how you're following this conversation, pang.
I don't know either. Between the english being his second language and the shrouded pessimism, it's become a monotonous argument consisting of "eople are bad!" "you are looking at just one part of them.." "eople are bad!"
i have said it that it's not about argument it's about saving Earth's Humanity..........
And yet you seem to have no idea about Earth's humanity. You have been portraying these ideas about humans throughout this thread as if all of these are new to us humans. All of what you have been stating has been present for many many many years (centuries). At the same time, you ignore the idea that human's can be good, and then assign an arbitrary number as what must be shown for such a fact to be proven.
This also further makes me question what personal morals you hold? I say this because I considered pointing towards yourself, as I'm sure that, like most people, you have empathy. By doing so, I would remind you that you are a part of the human race, which you have been showing with nothing but negativity. However, given your nature in this thread, I began to doubt if doing so would be effective.
Clearly 19912 Is Incompatible With Rational Discussion He/She Interacts Only Through BOMBAST And RUN-ON SENTENCES
@19912 If HUMANITY Is Evil Nobody Can Save It So You May As Well Just Accept That And Drown Your Sorrows In Drink For The Rest Of Your Life But If You Want To Talk To These People And Not Look Like A Complete FOOL You Have To Learn How To Make Coherent And Logical Arguments..........
No one is going off topic. At least, I don't think they are. Honestly, I'm still not sure what the topic is! Let me give you some options and you tell me what you're after.
Option 1: We shouldn't use any of the Earth's resources at all.
This would be a tough sell. No trees, plants, coal, animals. We would die off pretty quickly!
Option 2: We should only use resources we can replace, but avoid killing animals.
In this, we could grow crops for food and chop down trees for lumber - so long as we replant the trees we use and whatnot. We still wouldn't be able to use things like coal and oil so there would be no transportation, electricity, etc. (Though nuclear power might still be a possibility in this option).
Option 3: Just like 2, expect we can use non-renewable resources to a point. But we should ultimately aim for cleaner fuels (e.g. solar/wind/hydroelectric power). Plus we could use nuclear power so long as we could safely dispose of it.
Option 4: Pretty much how we are now, but only killing animals humanely and treating them humanely before they are butchered.
Option 5: I'm just missing the point of the thread and should just shut it!
we are doing missuse of powers given us by the god
and this:
I vote for "Option : 2" but with some little changes.
God gave us dominion over the earth. We can use it however we want to. Sure, we abuse animals - but we're allowed to! Yes, we waste resources, but we're allowed to! At what point are we "doing missuse of powers given by the god"?
we are doing missuse of powers given us by the god. What do you think about this ? Can we prevent this ?
Your "missuse" claim is still unsubstantiated, because you have not explained what these powers are or how you arrived at the conclusion that our use of them is improper.
