
We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More
65 | 36568 |
From the things I have notice around the world, From territory disputes to social media activism, should this world be destroyed? Post opinions pls.
What do you mean?
i know that we are screwed, but i have no idea who 'Fish" is. please explain. ( once again, sorry)
the world, itself, should not be destroyed, for there are other things besides humans living here. Humanity...has to try to rebound, for we can not fight for ourselves but for every little thing that has walked, roamed, slithered, slide, or scurried on this very planet.Anything that has been, is now, or will. That is what we should live for.
[quote]What do you mean?
The current level is "F the rules" level. Why? Didn't notice?
Did you hear about the good deed the man did by putting out the campfire that could have lit a forest down (No).
In short your crazy and its a dumb thing and ignorant thing to think humanity is horrible.
Oh, I just had a thought. Does this seem correct: If a particular species does more harm than good to the environment it inhabits, then the species should be eradicated. Is this a plausible line to take?
Oh, I just had a thought. Does this seem correct: If a particular species does more harm than good to the environment it inhabits, then the species should be eradicated. Is this a plausible line to take?
Trying another plausible line (although this rests on the idea that the destruction of the world =/= the complete destruction of the human race): we may have reached a point as a species where it is no longer possible for us, as a collective, to experience true happiness, fulfillment, joy, etc.; as such,the only morally responsible action is to "restart". That is, to destroy ourselves in hopes of future civilizations reaching a state of absolute fulfillment.
In what way is world destruction (in either sense) morally acceptible?
The question in itself is self-defeating. We, the inhabitants of this "world" created the morality on this planet in itself. No amount of this world's morality would justify it's host's destruction, it would result in its own destruction and certainly not favorable for any known morality.
0% of humanity deserves to die
No, 100% of humanity deserves to die. Everybody has a right to die by euthanasia, and therefore "deserves" to "die"
who's to say that no equilibrium shall be found in the future?
equilibrium will be found, but depending on the circumstances, the process could and have been proven to wreck havoc on the surrounding ecosystem. consider the cane toad infestations in Australia. shouldn't they, a pest and an invader, be justifiably eradicable? I would love to exterminate every last one of those "invaders"
No, 100% of humanity deserves to die. Everybody has a right to die by euthanasia, and therefore "deserves" to "die"
From the things I have notice around the world, From territory disputes to social media activism, should this world be destroyed? Post opinions pls.
I thinks it's a little dramatic to want to destroy the World because of a few lunatics.
xD xD
well im not gonna be destroyed/die because some people have made this world rotten.
bring in kira please! [le death note reference]
Well... it really depends i guess, most people have good enough morals, but i can't speak for everyone on the planet. Maybe if something pretty major was threatening all life on earth, then we could finally get along and work together, and hopefully become better people from that.
Thread is locked!
We may use cookies to help customize your experience, including performing
analytics and serving ads.
Learn More