ForumsThe TavernThe Zombie Survival Club! (basic rules on page 144)

5049 657882
thoadthetoad
offline
thoadthetoad
5,642 posts
Peasant

This is a completely serious club, people who make a decent enough plan will be able to comment and review other plans. Here is some zombie info.

run/walk: they walk

scream/groan: they groan

day/night: All da time babey!

what they attack: EVERYTHING THEY HEAR, OR THAT MOVES!

survivors: very very little, like near 100-1000 people on EARTH

guns: This is real time, being your neighboorhood and everything, you have all the resources you have in your house.

cure: there is none.

where to go: so long as you have a plan to get their, go for it.

how much you can carry: AGAIN, THIS IS REAL TIME

family members: theres a high chance they are zombehs too.
able to join: if you didn't read, just make a good plan.

durability: they can take ALOT of damage, worse than playing last stand 2 with just a pistol for the entire game when the zombies have twice as much life.

doors: they can't work a doorhandle for the mostpart of their brain is already rotted
I am still making my plan right now, but I think some of you can do it. Let the zombie surviving begin!

  • 5,049 Replies
TROJANS
offline
TROJANS
372 posts
Nomad

i would have the normal 45.colt pistol and the shotgun would be a scatgun145x7 i forgot wat the shotgun was called but it was something like that

quakingphear
offline
quakingphear
410 posts
Peasant

The 45 is a good choice. But instead of a shot gun i'd invest in a .22. maybe something with a decent mag size. It's a small caliber, but it will pierce the skull. Plus it;s really quiet and you can carry more shells than a shotgun. Cheaper too.

Vitamins
offline
Vitamins
141 posts
Nomad

This sounds cool! Here lemme try.

I'd get a M249 S.A.W, backup a little and blow the living SH*T out of those zombies

Did I win?

quakingphear
offline
quakingphear
410 posts
Peasant

Sorry no cigar. But this isn't a contest anyway. A SAW is a really bad*** gun, but for a zombie it wouldn't help much. You need a clean headshot, prefferably from a distance. The SAW is better a close range, and if it's full auto you'd get the adrenaline pumping and lose your head. Plus you could waste crucial ammo.

Emperor_Tiberlaw
offline
Emperor_Tiberlaw
120 posts
Nomad

How Ever It can clear a crowd from onto of a roof top.
An Advantage there!

Emperor_Tiberlaw
offline
Emperor_Tiberlaw
120 posts
Nomad

And the S.A.W. Is a meduim range weapon. Close range would be like a shotgun or a machete!
A small Minigun would clear a crowd of zombies in a couple of seconds.

quakingphear
offline
quakingphear
410 posts
Peasant

I don't know if a minigun would. Small bullet so no stopping power. Plus a minigun need lots of ammo, and it can't be carried by one person. That guy from Predator in the jungle? It couldn't happen. all the tech you'd need can't fit in a backpack.

Timegoesby
offline
Timegoesby
1,006 posts
Nomad

Yeah but you have to get the guns, would you want to fight people for guns? Just wait and you will most likely find some one your way from people who have been changed and left them there.

Strongbow
offline
Strongbow
324 posts
Nomad

So it looks as though guns and ammo are the most essentials for an on-the-go survivor. Having weapons is essential, of course, but some of them are just too conspicuous or just plain noisy.

I would probably use my:
-.22 pistol, *thanks ex-bf*
-I dont own a machete, but a fire hatchet would do for cracking skulls and getting in buildings.

The major consideration is STEALTH. If you get bloody trigger happy, more than likely, youll have plenty of company in no time at all. Shoot ONLY when neccessary, and keep moving. Rambos tend to join the undead in a hurry.

OK. Youve made your move... you breach the fence around the school. Walking across the football field, suddenly a shot rings out and something whizzes by you. It seems some Lonewolf "King of the Field" survivor is not so happy about you getting into his kingdom. He's up near the stands and seems to have a rifle. Rounds zing by you as he rambles about this and that. Two unlucky victims are sprawled nearby. One has a .357 in his hand. The other, around 15 feet from you, has a bandolier on and near him, a shotgun.

How would the survivors handle "His Royal Craziness?"

TROJANS
offline
TROJANS
372 posts
Nomad

let say i ran out of ammo out of all my guns.my machete is with me wielding it on my left hand(cause im a lefty)i make a choice to go to the police station.but there are 5 zombies right there would i fight or go to house and see my luck.let see wat you pick but i would pick fighting the zombies wat do you cchoose??

quakingphear
offline
quakingphear
410 posts
Peasant

@Strongbow If the shotgun had slug rounds , and not buckshot i'd go for it. Both guns are pretty crappy against a rifle. But I'd probably run away and wait for the zombies to just gather around him. 2 birds with one stone. He takes most of them out, and he eventually runs low on ammo.

Strongbow
offline
Strongbow
324 posts
Nomad

@quakingphear: good point.

Buckshot is basically useless. you might as well dump it into your hand and throw it at the undead. Slugs are better, but also keep in mind:

-shotguns require some degree of expertice. they kick and can be hard to aim.
-THEY ARE NOISY. very noisy. you may as well have a bullhorn and invite every deadhead for miles to come and have a nibble.
-Slow to load. a bit cumbersome. They DO, however, make a decent bashing weapon, for awhile.

Great work. Lets see some other survivors in action.

me44
offline
me44
154 posts
Peasant

What is the purpose of this?

steevo15
offline
steevo15
1,562 posts
Peasant

Strongbow Said: they kick and can be hard to aim.


I have shot a shotgun before, it wasn't really that hard to aim, and the kick is enough to push your shoulder back, but it is not enough to make a difference in anything.
saxon94
offline
saxon94
30 posts
Nomad

I want to join:-)

Showing 91-105 of 5049