Forums → WEPR → bigfoot vs. lochness vs. chupacabra : which is more believable?

here is the nessie pic

None of them have to be more beliveable than the other. They are all equally untrue. Despite all the 'sightings' of each monster/beast/thingy none of them have any real solid evidence to support these claims. Its like me saying 'what is more beleiveable flying cows or flying pigs?' They are both untrue. Thats what i think anyway altho if i had to choose id pick Nessie as my fave. I picture him as a sea monster with a scottish accent.brilliant.

I think Nessie's a log or something some guy saw when he had a bit too much to drink and took a snapshot of it, then decided it was a monster. Now, it can be hoaxed and such, but it ain't true. I believe in Sasquatch, but he's probably just a guy in an outfit. Although they did find a body...anyways, the Chupacabra has evidence that can't be hoaxed. Victims, sucked dry. Photos, of creatures doing things humans couldn't (eg. climbing in a way that would break human bones.) and real people, terrified by it. No one sits around at home going "Oh man I really hope Nessie doesn't come out and kill me..." but people do sit around saying "Oh, god, I hope the Chupacabra can't get in, he'll suck my blood out..." See what I mean? I believe in the Chupacabra.

Belive what you want i still think its a load of BS. Also i never said it was a guy in a suit, it could just be a hungry a.ss animal. Its probably just a team of mutant bats that morph into 1 mega mutant bat. That to me is the most likely explanation.

I hope mermaids are real personally, I mean have you guys seen that Disney movie, those chicks are HOT!! Don't where the exact way to get things done with one, if you know what I mean, but I'd manage.

lol but anything past 3rd base would be tricky wiv a mermaid nuff said

well the bigfoot that was found was a fake and the victims being sucked dry from the chupacabre could just be from the heart stop beating and all the blood goes to the heart making it look like all the blood was sucked dry, though a police officer got footage of a strange looking animal that looks like it could be an actual chupacabre. I have no clue about nessie though, and mermaids? dang I hope there real lol.

old time disney movies have hidden things in them like on the lil mermaid the priest syas i dearly beloved and when he bends back he has wood..and on the lion king when ever he blows the sparkly stuff and it spells out S-E-X

Nessie seems most believable out of all of them. How we could live on the land and never see the two land beasts should be alot of proof of nonexistence. But a gigantic sea monster could be anywhere, and dive to any fathom.

Theone, in Alladin, a guy says in the background "Fair teenagers, take off your clothes." I'm not kidding. And Raistlin, I mean totally sucked dry, nothing in the heart or other.

Nessy scientific name "Nessiteras rhombopteryx" by Sir Peter Scott
It was discovered that if you re-arranged the letters of Nessiteras rhombopteryx it could read "Monster hoax by Sir Peter S

Personally, if I had to choose one, it would probably be chupacabra, because people don't even know what it is, so it's probably a wolf or something.

With the new bigfoot pictures out, it would be Bigfoot. Even though I doubt it is real, it has more of a chance now than the others.

bahh thats not real bigfoot thats a guy in a gorrila suit or a gorrila
chupicabra thats just made up by a computer also known as the kissing bug and the nessie in irland they used a fake woodin thing took picture of it in the water just so they could be fameus all of it is fake for fame

I personally think that more impish creatures are more likely to be true. OF those three, I'd say that nessie would be the most beleivable. I find it possible that a dinosaur could have been trapped in ice, we've found cavemen after all. I am a budding cryptozoologist really, I want to find some more mystery in the world, to preserve the majesty from extinction.