I do not think any country could invade the US. Every house you go to they have atleast a gun in the house. In the South its different. Theres bout 5 guns or more in each house. Does anyone agree with me?
Of course it could cause you know, nuclear bombs, long ranged missiles from china or russia or whoever wants to attack us it could and may happen. i mean if there was an all out nuclear attack sure but hopefully that wont happen.
Nuclear war with the US would be suicide. If you don't take out every nuclear launch site in a country, then they can (and will) send nukes right back at you. That is why the US and Russia didn't ever use their nuclear stockpiles; both countries are so large that it would be very improbable that they would destroy every launch site. Also, the US has 5,113 nukes in it's stockpile and many more that are retired or not operational. According to http://www.neatorama.com/2010/05/03/just-how-many-nukes-does-the-us-have/ ,
The US has the most operation nukes in the world, and most of the countries with nuclear weapons are much smaller than the US. This means that the US has a better chance of taking out their launch stations than the other country.
Excuse me, typo in the last post. The Russian nuclear stockpile is in disarray and many nukes are not accounted for or are in bad condition. So, I made the inference that the US could put into operation the most nuclear weapons.
But, if the US was invaded, unless they are going to pull a plan out of Shepard's playbook (MW2 campaign =P), they can't nuke an invasion force, which would be the primary concern over nuking the invading country. After the forces are pushed out is a different matter however.
I was trying to slip my MW2 reference in there. How dare you thwart me nichodemus!!!!!!! Anyway, I don't think the UN would approve of any use of nuclear weapons anyway, or the invasion of a main member.
But it sure helps if they do. It is possible for any country to get invaded at a certain point, but with the very delicate balance in the economy and foreign countries relying on others for goods, a big war could upset that balance. Correct me if I am wrong, but does any country have the means AND motive to invade a military like the USA+allies<(maybe).
Correct me if I am wrong, but does any country have the means AND motive to invade a military like the USA+allies<(maybe).
I never said any did. My point was merely that the UN is a spineless organization that can't affect the larger powers if they are bent on doing what they want, i.e declare war.
That is why the US and Russia didn't ever use their nuclear stockpiles;
*cough* Hiroshima, Nagasaki *cough
Correct me if I am wrong, but does any country have the means AND motive to invade a military like the USA+allies<(maybe).
/racism and stereotyping/ Hey, the Chinese can send out their robots instead of them /racism and stereotyping/ On a serious note, no I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to try to attack a country with a military such as the US's. But, in the other hand, someone may get overconfident in their army, and repeat the mistake Hitler did. Who knows, everything's possible
Nuclear war with the US would be suicide. If you don't take out every nuclear launch site in a country, then they can (and will) send nukes right back at you. That is why the US and Russia didn't ever use their nuclear stockpiles; both countries are so large that it would be very improbable that they would destroy every launch site. Also, the US has 5,113 nukes in it's stockpile and many more that are retired or not operational. According to http://www.neatorama.com/2010/05/03/jus ⦠e-us-have/
No the other nation need not to blow every nuke stockpile of US, all they need is a suicide mission to blow up one of nuke storage facility properly(to start a chain reaction).
You actually can. They're called tactical nuclear bombs, to be used on the field and can be mounted on anything from a small vehicle to a small bazooka type weapon.
Yeah enemies will die but that area will be qurentined for 50 years ryte?
Hey, the UN doesn't need to sanction wars for them to happen. Vietnam, the Falkland Wars, the Chechen Wars.
Some wise guy said that if an issue b/w to weak nations is brought into UN that issue vanishes. If an issue b/w a strong nation and a weak nation comes in UN than weaker nation vanishes, and if an issue b/w two strong nations comes in UN, the UNO vanishes.
The nukes are spread out so much and are located in the middle of nowhere in deserts, many feet underground. Even if your "suicide mission" set off one bomb, it wouldn't even be close to detonating a fraction of the entire stockpile.