ForumsWEPRGlobal Warming

933 224227
zombieslayer
offline
zombieslayer
94 posts
Nomad

i dont beleive in global warming because i think that it is so gradual that by the time it is dangerous the next ice age will counter act it

Does any one else have any views or opinions about that?

  • 933 Replies
volcanboy
offline
volcanboy
425 posts
Nomad

The final end here is that they are reducing their outputs and trying to help the Earth


They didn't care what happened to the Earth years ago. But as soon as they see a risk they are bothered.

They're not trying to save the Earth, they're trying to save themselves.
volcanboy
offline
volcanboy
425 posts
Nomad

volcanboy
offline
volcanboy
425 posts
Nomad

Found this on the internet, it's about the countries producing the most CO2.

Ones furthest to the left are producing the most.

Estel
offline
Estel
1,973 posts
Peasant

Haha, obviously.

Well, I'm not surprised, for at least the first two. The Falklands I actually had to look up because I've never heard of them. I am guessing there might be alot of factories there....

TotalReview
offline
TotalReview
803 posts
Shepherd

i think its just a thing the world does every couple hundred years or so


The time between a cooling and heating stage is much longer then that. It is thousands of years. This is why global warming is a bad name. The Earth does go through those stages but human impact is intensifying it. We are also shortening the time between the two stages which can cause horrific consequences. Right now, we are seeing the ice caps melt. There have been a few heat waves in America but not much. Hurricanes build off of warm ocean water and we have already had 6 or more named storms I believe. Let's fast forward 100 years. We will probably all be gone but think of your kids and grandchildren. Coastal life will be no more because of the sea level. Hawaii will probably be gone. Heat waves will strike everywhere with extremely hot conditions. Hurricanes will be stronger and cause worse damage then any hurricane ever seen.

This is why we need to make change now. If we wait until then, it will be too late. Sadly, many people figure it won't affect them and would rather just sit in their energy consuming homes. There are also people who don't even believe in global warming. I don't understand how you can't believe in it. Even if you don't believe in it, why not change to some green materials such as the light bulbs. They save you money. Even though hybrids cost more, look at the gas prices. In the long run, hybrids save you more money. People are just too lazy to care about the world now and this is going to greatly affect the future.
th3pr3tz3l
offline
th3pr3tz3l
189 posts
Nomad

I no longer believe in man-made global warming.

And the reason whi is because CO2 is only a mere 0.38 per cent of the total atmosphere -- or 380 parts per million. Of this amount, only three per cent, or 11.4 parts per million, is man-made, the rest occurring naturally.

Sounds miniscule to me =P. The real danger of the idea of global warming is the politicians who are being stampeded into panic measures.

TotalReview
offline
TotalReview
803 posts
Shepherd

And the reason whi is because CO2 is only a mere 0.38 per cent of the total atmosphere


Think about how big our atmosphere is. .38% is still a chunk of it. This is why I said it would be very hard to stop it but we need to try to give the scientists more time. We are still making a big impact even if we are causing only that small part of it.
volcanboy
offline
volcanboy
425 posts
Nomad

The Falklands I actually had to look up because I've never heard of them. I am guessing there might be alot of factories there....


The islands belong to Britain. Theres a permanent military status there after the war in the 80s.
volcanboy
offline
volcanboy
425 posts
Nomad

So, yes there will be a lot going on there which may produce CO2.

th3pr3tz3l
offline
th3pr3tz3l
189 posts
Nomad

co2 is only .38% of the atmosphere, and if u whip out your calculator, we've only contributed .0114% of the atmosphere.

I'm not saying pollution is right. I am appaled at it in fact. But I do not believe it is contributing to global warming.

Estel
offline
Estel
1,973 posts
Peasant

Actually, CO2 is about 9% of our atmosphere, so where did you get .38%?

You also have to take Methane into account. It has had a bigger increase than CO2

TotalReview
offline
TotalReview
803 posts
Shepherd

It doesn't matter how big or small the percentage is. The problem is that we are still contributing to global warming. If we just lowered our impact a little bit, that could save us a lot of time in the future.

th3pr3tz3l
offline
th3pr3tz3l
189 posts
Nomad

Ward Benedict.

I don't know where YOU got 9%. And I will revise my earlier number to .385%

9% would also be very toxic. As 7 to 10% can cause unconciousness in a few minutes to an hour.

even 1% can cause drowsiness.

volcanboy
offline
volcanboy
425 posts
Nomad

You also have to take Methane into account. It has had a bigger increase than CO2


Does Methane do the same damage as carbon Dioxide
Carlie
offline
Carlie
6,823 posts
Blacksmith

And the reason whi is because CO2 is only a mere 0.38 per cent of the total atmosphere -- or 380 parts per million. Of this amount, only three per cent, or 11.4 parts per million, is man-made, the rest occurring naturally.

No, before the industrial revolution, CO2 was at 280 ppm in the atmosphere. We have already raised it 100 ppm since then. That is a pretty large increase.
Showing 616-630 of 933