Why is a country that prefers not to fight, or might not have the resources to fight, a fail? Doesn't make sense to me. I think the countries that start shipping over tanks at the first hint of conflict are a Fail.
C'mon Holland is AWSOME! I live there, am I the only one? Before the crisis we had a great economie, and soft drugs are legal here! Plenty of good looking girls, few great artists. Pity of the boring landscape:P
I love Holland's liberalism and most Dutch are pretty friendly towards us English (and also speak it excellently) so I like Holland.
Any country who claims neutrality in every war is a FAIL in my book...
Not that a nations military is any measure of a nations greatness but don't you mean Switzerland? They are renowned for being neutral. It seems like a pretty smart policy too, holding everyone's money as they go to war, weaken their economies whilst you get stronger.
In addition Holland was invaded and occupied by the Nazis during WW2 and they did have a relatively large underground resistance force.
Any country that joins in every war late is a FAIL in my book.... Jk, the US contribution was invaluable, but you can see how it works both ways.
If it wasn't for Holland, I wouldn't have some of the animals I raise now. Breeders saved an extremely rare breed of rabbit, for example, from the Nazis... Those rabbits now thrive in both Europe and America now thanks to dedicated breeders. The breed is called Thrianta (Tree-anh-tah). The reason the Nazis wanted them eradicated was due to the fire red color... Similar to the national color of Holland.
Here is a photo of a Thrianta... Not the best color, but it gets the point across.