Yeah every explanation for how the Earth/universe was created has flaws, it's just some people say one explanation has more flaws. Sometimes they just ignore the flaws of their beliefs and say only one belief has flaws. Everything has flaws, even non-explanations, like humans, for example, are full of flaws.
I don't know but a 6 billion year mistake for the time the universe to be created as evidenced by Uranium 238 dating in asteroids seems like an awfully big mistake on the part of Creationism.
Uranium dating is not necessarily any more accurate than carbon dating.
Same with the creationism.
What senseless arguments do you see? What flaws are there?
Lol Taylan nice picture. Did scientists start running out of names and just put a v with numbers behind? I mean seriously, V392 Carinae? V392? Whatever, scientists are lazy. Still a nice slide show of pictures, though.
Uranium dating is not necessarily any more accurate than carbon dating.
Radiometric dating can just meausre the age of much older materials. Carbon dating is limited, whereas because of the vast half life of most radioactive materials, it can measure much older materials.
However, generally in these threads, I am noticing a trend. Atheists are putting up certain theories and creationsits argue against it. Personally I would like to see some evidence for the theory of creationsim, other than 'it said so in the Bible'.
Scientists have gone nuts and started to bang on the keyboard creating random names
I like the name of some of the asteroids that have been found. 'Cos anyone with a half decent telescope can identify (and name) a new one they end up with great names. Just a few rndom numbers/letters like V392 then johnlennon, or V465fatboy. (obviously the codes are wrong if anyone wants to be pedantic)
Lol V465fatboy. That's gotta be my favorite celestial body, even though it's just an asteroid. But really, do they have to name every asteroid? Can't they just classify them under a certain group and say,"That is _____ asteroid." or something? They're putting too much into it, and need to generalize more with things like asteroid. Star I can understand the need to name them to an extent, but eventually I'd feel the same about stars, too. Not every celestial body needs a name, just a classification group.
