AGS Steam Games

Forums → Forum Games → Fail to 100

13029 3062076
XxLBJames23xX
offline
XxLBJames23xX
769 posts
Peasant

Okay, heres the deal. We have to count to 100 before a Moderator posts. If a moderator posts, we start over from one. Pretty self explanatory!

RULES
1.)You can't have back to back post.
2.)You can't continue if a mod stops you.
3.)You can have a normal discussion while counting
Example
P1= 1! So guys to you see the Cav's game last night. He made a SWEET buzzer beater!
P2= 2! Yea, I have to admit, that buzzer beater was pretty cool even though I don't like the Cav's.
P3= 3! I don't watch basketball but I have tried to make some buzzer beaters. They are really hard.

Back to Rules
4.)Don't Spam!!

Have fun!

  • 13,029 Replies
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

ah well, i backposted anyway.

unreasonable could be beaten by reason = opinion.

rationale = opinion.

normal = opinion.

what happens when you break things down too much = paradoxes.

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

ever heard of a proxy?


Yeah, proxies would work in this situation, yet those that use proxies are either from being in school, or from being banned. Those that use proxies to circumvent accounts because of being banned will usually return with heated anger, and will thus be banned promptly. It's experience.

In the case that you showed, you can somewhat tell the &quotosting style" of a user, if you know them well. If they used an alt for whatever reason it is, and they are caught with the same &quotersonalities", then they will be promptly banned. Or warned. Whichever.

Then you have the alts that are used for "support", trying to help out the original account for god knows what. It can easily be pieced out to see that it's the work of an alt, and the two accounts are again promptly banned.

What you just did was...too easy lol
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

yet those that use proxies are either from being in school, or from being banned


it can be many many many more reasons than that. and proxies are used to access this site giving the site more money. why would they want to stop money?

and they are caught with the same &quotersonalities", then they will be promptly banned. Or warned. Whichever.


If I were to suddenly become a Grammar Nazi on another account and use the thesaurus for all my words will you know it's me? + many newcomers would be accused.
Breaking:

* "stalk" or otherwise harass anyone;
or that otherwise negatively affects other users' ability to participate in Communities

What you just did was...too easy lol

http://www.cs.uleth.ca/~legge/find_x.gif

(title change made my post not work )
knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

6. I am surprised this has broken down into a warning. Why did you continue this Danger Sexy Man?

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

If I were to suddenly become a Grammar Nazi on another account and use the thesaurus for all my words will you know it's me? + many newcomers would be accused.


Except it wouldn't be many other newcomers, it would be you and others, because we would know. Of course since you already did the spamming with multiple alts, the mods could just offer a suitable punishment and call it a day, correct? No need to go into the detail of the concepts and moralities of banning because of circumvented alts. It also says in the T&C that mods can also ban users based on their own judgments. If Gantic were to ban you right now, it would be because he had irrefutable reason to believe you were spamming with multiple alts. Which you were.
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

Except it wouldn't be many other newcomers, it would be you and others, because we would know


what's stopping you from knowing say.... i'm knight_34?

No need to go into the detail of the concepts and moralities of banning because of circumvented alts. It also says in the T&C that mods can also ban users based on their own judgments. If Gantic were to ban you right now, it would be because he had irrefutable reason to believe you were spamming with multiple alts. Which you were.


Did you not read what i said above you on the last page?

circumventing a ban with alts is the only i see, taunting = trolling? every opinionated thing in Terms and Conditions could be thrown against me. Won't help arguing against it because Mods are given higher privileges than users and may ban for whatever they like because they're Trusted.


I am surprised this has broken down into a warning. Why did you continue this Danger Sexy Man?


feeling argumentative.

oh, and 7
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

what's stopping you from knowing say.... i'm knight_34?


Because he has a different posting style. That and I couldn't see a fathomable reason why someone would post with an alt, when the original is already so high up in the charts, with a combined AP of over 30000. Not saying that AP governs how we find different people, but that the unique posting style of a person shows that he is different.

Did you not read what i said above you on the last page?


circumventing a ban with alts is the only i see, taunting = trolling? every opinionated thing in Terms and Conditions could be thrown against me. Won't help arguing against it because Mods are given higher privileges than users and may ban for whatever they like because they're Trusted.


The mods use the T&C and interpret them through their own judgments. They are trusted because they are rational; they do not cast punishments on a whim; they always have a genuine reason for everything, and if not, they will find one. If a mod banned you wrongly, speak up and say differently. They can be waived by an admin if there is a good reason for it. If they wronged in their duties, they can be stripped of their privileges and even more. Generally, the reason to believe you made an infraction of the T&S is true.
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

(backpost)

the unique posting style of a person shows that he is different.


The unique posting style, the unique posting style....

1. you have to have thousands of posts
2. you have to assume it's the same person every time
3. grammar and vocabulary is only noticable when there is an anomaly

The mods use the T&C and interpret them through their own judgments


can you not interpret something to use in to your own judgements?

They are trusted because they are rational

opinion.
they do not cast punishments on a whim

assumption
they always have a genuine reason for everything, and if not, they will find one

genuine is only for the individual.
They can be waived by an admin if there is a good reason for it.

not in my experience, what is Good?

i'll pick at your words all night just to be last. (fleeting assumption you're not somehow related to Flite)
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

can you not interpret something to use in to your own judgements?


If we didn't have the T&C as the rules of the site, what would the mods use as a stance to punish the abusers?

opinion.


If there was a mod that wasn't rational when making a judgment, then his/her actions would have been waived by a higher-up or would have been stripped of the privilege. Simple as that.

not in my experience, what is Good?


good as in evidence.

genuine is only for the individual.


genuine is when they find reason to believe that the user is making an infraction to the T&S. I can run in circles with my posts too you know.

10
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

can you not interpret something to use in to your own judgements?
[quote]If we didn't have the T&C as the rules of the site, what would the mods use as a stance to punish the abusers?
[/quote]

the point of my question is that what you said was redundant.

If there was a mod that wasn't rational when making a judgment, then his/her actions would have been waived by a higher-up or would have been stripped of the privilege. Simple as that.


If there was a mod that was rationale when making a judgment, then his/her actions could have been waived by an irrational higher-up or would have been stripped of the privilege. Simple as that.

good as in evidence.


What evidence is there if it were deleted?

genuine is when they find reason to believe that the user is making an infraction to the T&S. I can run in circles with my posts too you know.


the T&S is in some areas completely ruled by opinions. I can run in circles with my posts too you know.

10


back-posting doesn't count, so if another user were to post it'd be 8.
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

If there was a mod that was rationale when making a judgment, then his/her actions could have been waived by an irrational higher-up or would have been stripped of the privilege. Simple as that.


The admins are like the supreme court. Whether or not their judgments are rational doesn't matter; what they determine is always right.

What evidence is there if it were deleted?


Could you delete users, forum posts, game comments, or comments from another user?

the T&S is in some areas completely ruled by opinions


opinions turn to ethics. Ethics turn into laws, T&C being the law of AG.

I can run in circles with my posts too you know.


touche :3
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

Could you delete users, forum posts, game comments, or comments from another user?


Mods/Admins can, and then your
hen his/her actions could have been waived by higher-up or would have been stripped of the privilege.
would've been null.

opinions turn to ethics. Ethics turn into laws, T&C being the law of AG.

Law being ruled by stereotypes, Law being ruled by humans (= corruption).

what they determine is always right.


'ts what it all boils down to. Yus.

rawr.
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

Mods/Admins can, and then your

then his/her actions could have been waived by higher-up or would have been stripped of the privilege.

would've been null.


Why would the admins want to delete evidence in order to get another user? Why cause problems themselves when they know they won't get punished themselves? They wouldn't.

Law being ruled by stereotypes, Law being ruled by humans (= corruption).


There is no "stereotype" of the T&C; it is all one group of people. It is there so that everyone can have a peaceful, enjoyable time at AG, because there are those that would love to hinder that peaceful, enjoyable time. That is it. You are free to do whatever in AG, so long as you don't disrupt the T&C. Breaking the T&C is ruining the time of everyone else to have a clean, peaceful, enjoyable time at AG.

what they determine is always right.


We just have to hope that what they do IS right. Because if anything that they did wasn't, AG wouldn't be how it is today.
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

There is no "stereotype" of the T&C; it is all one group of people.


Lull. your two statements contradict eachother. People = always stereotype.

so long as you don't disrupt the T&C

So long as you don't disrupt another.

10.
Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

nu. miggy you gotta wait till there's two posts inbetween yours.

next is 11.

Showing 6196-6210 of 13029