Im going to say america canada's population isn't as high and its all in a few areas so all america would have to do is take over the few areas and win
First off, we shouldn't get into a war with Canada, that's just stupid. Plus there's NATO (North Atlantic Peace Treaty), which is a peace treaty with the U.S. and Canada both in it.
But even if we did get into a war with Canada, we would easily win. We have a bigger army, a larger population better weapons, more power+allies, and just an all around better military. Plus, MrMonkey3 is right. Canada may be a huge geological country, but their population is based in very few places, and not very spread out. We would just capture a few places, and then win the war.
actually it means north atlantic treaty organization. otherwise it would be calles NAPT.
more power+allies,
well i think that there is not a single american ally who is not also allied with canada and therefore i think in a case of an american canadian war it would be just a one on one
Why do people keep on forgetting that we are comparing the US and Canada one on one, without allied support?!
well i think that there is not a single american ally who is not also allied with canada and therefore i think in a case of an american canadian war it would be just a one on one
That's pretty much true. The US and Canada has many allies in common.
Canada's terrain doesnt seem very forgiving if you get off the beaten path so canada could organize guerilla fighting which might work for awhile on their home turf. Snow and ice storms will probably affect them less then our troops so they will probably have the advantage of mobility. A big part will be who is in charge of the armies too. Couldnt they also mess with the US oil lines in alaska? Which would make the war much more expensive on america so much so they might decide to give up.
Im trying to fight for canada now since it has seemed pretty one sided up until this point
i think that mostly happens, because people do not read the entire thread, but simply post their opinion to the question after reading the title
You're correct, again. Some people have also misunderstood the thread and accused others as anti-Canadians. Crazy, since obviously this is all hypothetical.
as long as neither the us or candian governement takes part in this debate it certainly is.
and you can see the pattern, that people tend to pronounce the winner of this war according to the country they come from
Well, some people do. Those people.
Some people simply say Canada because they are Canadian.
Americans simply say America, because they are Americans. Though it is generally acknowledged that the US would win, so of course the Americans would choose the US.
I'm Russian, no idea why you would even think of this... You have too many wars already...and what not? Iran, Iraq, Afganistan *was* right below me before we lost thoughs countries by rebels and wars. See what you did to them there...it's not a prety sight.
you are the dumbest poster in this forum srsly comparing canada to america? california's national guard has more manpower than the entire canadian defense forces we landed on the moon we have nukes we got the powa we got the industry and agriculture and economy we got the advanced communications and satilites, and we have canada nearly surounded (thanks, alaska)
Incorrect.... The United States can't even use there nucular wepons, Banns and laws forbid it. Also it doesn't mean anything that you landed on the moon, get over it, that was 40 years ago. Without us, you could well be occupied by Germany... Alaska doesn't have anything at all-barely 10,000 men... You don'y have any power. You are already in enough wars and conflicts. Even if America declared war, the U.N. would be on America in days/weeks. America would be another segragated Germany after WW2... And lastly, why would you be asking any of these questions? War Should Be Your Last Option
THIS ENTIRE THREAD REVOLVES AROUND A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION
Incorrect.... The United States can't even use there nucular wepons, Banns and laws forbid it.
The US could still use their nukes even if laws forbid their use. They would break the international laws against the use of them if they see it fit.
Also it doesn't mean anything that you landed on the moon, get over it, that was 40 years ago.
It does mean something. Though it does not mean much these days, that was forty years ago.
Without us, you could well be occupied by Germany... Alaska doesn't have anything at all-barely 10,000 men...
Nope. You cannot say definitely that the Germans would of occupied the US if the USSR didn't play its role. What about Alaska are you talking about exactly? Even if Alaska has ten thousand men, (I think this is an underestimation) the US could still send in men from the mainland, assemble forces in Alaska and use it as another launching pad for an assault.
You don'y have any power. You are already in enough wars and conflicts.
For me a non-American, that was still a clear misstatement. The US has power. It has one of the most technologically advanced armed forces in the world. Recent wars have not significantly weakened the country.
Even if America declared war, the U.N. would be on America in days/weeks.
Remember we are only comparing the US and Canada one on one without any external support/influence.
Anyway, you can't say that the UN would immediately attack the US. This is very complicated.
America would be another segragated Germany after WW2...
That all depends. The US would be very difficult to conquer.
And lastly, why would you be asking any of these questions? War Should Be Your Last Option
US will won, because they have a LOT of technology and they have also a lot of allies
What allies? As far as I know, your lossing allies. Why would you even want a war... War is the massive loss of life, the blood spilt. Families torn apart. Killing of inisents. And brother versus brother... I know there is no such thing as World Peace, and there will never be any World Peace, but to want war? Thats just bloodthurstly, unhuman and barbaric.
