ForumsWEPRWho Would Win Canada Or U.S.A In A War

296 103021
patriotboy1
offline
patriotboy1
238 posts
Nomad

I know U.S.A has a better army and weapons developement in all but Canada has a ready army and a hell of alot more allies than America.

  • 296 Replies
knight_34
offline
knight_34
13,817 posts
Farmer

What allies? As far as I know, your lossing allies.


Well, they aren't really losing allies. The US has mainly received a lot of negativity and criticism for its actions. The US still has a lot allies.
ColonelAaron
offline
ColonelAaron
84 posts
Nomad

I was just point out that they are only minor allies. But Canada and the U.S. are both in the United Nations, , any conflict would start a global war.

dieath
offline
dieath
230 posts
Nomad

as much as the outcome would suck for me since i live in canada, the states would beat canada so bad for 1 reason, canada DOES NOT have any nuclear weapons and the us has enough too wipe canada (and any other countrie) that anoys them, off the planet.

Green12324
offline
Green12324
4,097 posts
Peasant

canada DOES NOT have any nuclear weapons and the us has enough too wipe canada (and any other countrie) that anoys them, off the planet.


Just because a country has them doesn't mean that they'll use it. It would be stupid to nuke a country so close anyway, since the U.S. would be affected by the fall out.
dieath
offline
dieath
230 posts
Nomad

youre forgeting 1 thing, they have never been in a war that they need too use them in other than ww2 witch they did use them in, if that would happen they would use them before they lost that war, so either way canada looses

Lieutenut
offline
Lieutenut
1,251 posts
Nomad

they have never been in a war that they need too use them in other than ww2


actually we didn't need to use nukes... just pointing that out I know it's irrevelant, but there was an invasion plan to take the Japanese homeland but we would have lost COUNTLESS mem who have already given so much... which is why we just nuked two japanese cities.

Anyways yeah, I'm not going to say who I think will win because it's pointless... why would you want to think of a war with Canada?
TSL3_needed
offline
TSL3_needed
5,579 posts
Nomad

It would be stupid to nuke a country so close anyway, since the U.S. would be affected by the fall out.


Not if we nuke Nunavut! That place is a barren wasteland anyway >>.>>

USA would win. Plain and simple. We always win, and Canada just doesn't have the industry nor the military to handle us. It'll be like every other war. We'll be winning by so much, we won't be allowed to bomb cities.
the_manta
offline
the_manta
4,536 posts
Peasant

Whoa, this thread has survived this long? Odd.

I don't see anybody going to war with Canada, ever. They're just too... harmless.

But I don't know much on the subject, so let's ignore me, hm?

Sssssnnaakke
offline
Sssssnnaakke
1,036 posts
Scribe

How about everyone asking themselves that before they post on this thread. Um how about nobody? Yes we would kill a ton of people and nature but how would that make the U.S.A win?

Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

It'll be like every other war. We'll be winning by so much, we won't be allowed to bomb cities.


HAHAHAHAHA, the U.S does not have the "greatest" army. Guess what the U.S army does? lose.

Vietnam? Lost.
Iraq? Lost/Will Be Lost. Face it.The war wasn't Saddam it's the geurilla fighting after Saddam.
War of 1812? Lost.
Korean War? Stalemate, plus it was pointless and stupid

The only war America REALLY came out on top was the civil war, and that's because it was both sides.
donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

The only war America REALLY came out on top was the civil war, and that's because it was both sides.


and ww1 and ww2, the kosovo conflict, dessert storm and some other minor conflicts all over the world
Sssssnnaakke
offline
Sssssnnaakke
1,036 posts
Scribe

If the USA even made a bomb somewhere outside for no reason the next world war would start. All or most of Europe with a little bit of Asia somewhere vs America a little of south America and a little bit of Asia there no balance that out...
Plus America living off export....

Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

and ww1 and ww2, the kosovo conflict, dessert storm and some other minor conflicts all over the world


The United States did not win the first or second world war.

NATO won Kosovo. The Allies won World War 1.

And in World War 2 the Allies won, the U.S dilly dallies around and comes and takes all the credit. After they take offense to a small event where less than a hundred men died and one ship sunk. And that event was just to KEEP the U.S from entering the war, you know, since they had no business being in it.

What were those other major conflicts that they won? If you named them I'm sure I could prove you wrong.
donpiet
offline
donpiet
755 posts
Peasant

if you named them I'm sure I could prove you wrong


you could do what you think is proof.

before the us entering the kosovo conflict nato troops from europe have been slaugthered there, and after that the us army has been asked for help.

as to the ww`s until america didnt take part, it was pretty much losing for the allies.

and we have of course dessert storm.
Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

Sorry, you said minor conflicts, I was mistaken.

By the way, I forgot about the Gulf War (that's the name, not desert storm)

Members of countries who sent men to the Gulf War Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Kuwait, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Korea, Spain, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

Germany and Japan sent financial assistance and equipment.

Face it. Without help, the U.S ain't done much.

Showing 151-165 of 296