This is a rather basic question that I happen to find myself asking sometimes. What is your opinion? State which you think would've come first and give a good reason as to why. I don't know if there has already been a thread on this, but I apologize if there has.
Obviously if you believe in creationism/intelligent design it had to be to chicken or the egg would have died. If you believe in evolution it would have to be the egg because things don't just appear as matured lifeforms.
Explain the actual white egg. That is not made up of cells. And I do not believe abiogenesis even touches upon inanimate objects created or evolving from other inanimate object. The sheel is created after the yolk and egg white have gone through the shell membrane and shell gland. Abiogenesis would only be used to prove evolution. And yet this is just a theory. It doesn't have much back up at all. Abiogenesis was only made a theory because creationism isn't a scientific explanation. There really is no proof. And even the isotopes of carbon, iron and whatnot had to originate wouldn't you agree?
and does that creature start from an egg or does a mammal produce it?
in order for the egg to work w/o evolution there must be two of the same anomalies w/ different genders to reproduce.... or it was very screwed up and asexually did it o.o
