ForumsWEPRHitler vs Stalin

310 86737
patriotboy1
offline
patriotboy1
238 posts
Nomad

(I don't think this topic was made yet).

I made this topic because people in the "Hitler vs Lenin" topic said they would have preferred this (Hitler vs Stalin).

So post what you think... I think Hitler was the better and smarter man.

http://www.noshame.org/scripts/yancey050429.htm

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=77830

  • 310 Replies
Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

That was definetely an interesting document though. Even if its from Germany.

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

But I asked for proof of them reporting that there was no crime in the statistics.


The first time any real crime statistics were reported in russia post ww2 was in 1990. Stalins order to keep everything crime related secret was strictly upheld til that point, and the ''official'' stats showed crime rates dropping year on year for decades to the point where they were basically at 0%. It's all in the link ive already posted.
wolf1991
offline
wolf1991
3,437 posts
Farmer

Post WW2? Buddy you're almost post cold war with 1990.

woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

Exactly, only with gorbachev and glasnost did any legit stats become available.

PanzerTank
offline
PanzerTank
1,707 posts
Nomad

They were both borth scum but at least Hitler rebuilt a nation from nothing who can say that? Then again he murdered millions, and disabled many more. He also brought the nation he rebuilt back to nothing. Stalin also was willing to ally himself with the Nazis at first, and that's pretty bad. Stalin murdered many as well.

Ok my decision is final! Hitler wins, his army owned the Panzer tanks.

jasonxtk
offline
jasonxtk
68 posts
Nomad

Hitler really wasn't a bad guy, he just wanted what was right for his people and blamed the Jews for their economic depression.

Squidbears
offline
Squidbears
626 posts
Nomad

Hitler really wasn't a bad guy

Hitler was a terrible person... he was a phenomenal leader... but a terrible person
darkwolf1
offline
darkwolf1
182 posts
Shepherd

[/i] he just wanted what was right for his people and blamed the Jews for their economic depression.[i]

Dude,He hated the jews very badly,He put then in camps,and even killed them for crying out loud.Look back at history.It is very,very true indeed.

GoblinD
offline
GoblinD
322 posts
Nomad

A phenomenal doesnt lead his country and everyone around to ruin.

iMogwai
offline
iMogwai
2,027 posts
Peasant

A phenomenal doesnt lead his country and everyone around to ruin.


He brought Germany out of poverty and, for the majority of the population, improved their standards of living. He did not lead them to ruin until the war.

He was still a horrible person, though.
GoblinD
offline
GoblinD
322 posts
Nomad

So you say he had some upsides, that doesn't matter. Overall the result talks for itself. Being good at economy doesn't make one a good leader, its everything together.

daleks
offline
daleks
3,766 posts
Chamberlain

Both of them are really bad. I would rather live under Hitler though because he would not randomly kill you. Stalin was insane and thought everyone was trying to kill him.

iMogwai
offline
iMogwai
2,027 posts
Peasant

Being good at economy doesn't make one a good leader, its everything together.


And being a bad person does not necessarily make you a bad leader.
Kyouzou
offline
Kyouzou
5,061 posts
Jester

Are you kidding, he was a charismatic, powerful, well loved leader that not only brought Germany out of the depression but then led it to conquer Europe. I agree he was one of the worst human beings who has ever lived but you cannot argue that he wasn't a great leader. Also, had the US not been attacked by Japan and then involved in the war there's a fairly good chance that he would have solidified his empire, rather than crashing and burning.

akqpars
offline
akqpars
183 posts
Nomad

A phenomenal doesnt lead his country and everyone around to ruin.


If he had succeded in ww2 there was going to be only one nation amongst the europe.

Also, had the US not been attacked by Japan and then involved in the war there's a fairly good chance that he would have solidified his empire, rather than crashing and burning.


Mark this, if there is a stronger Japan existed, there were be only chaos. They are the cancer of the human race. Even chineese and mongolians are tired of them.
Showing 106-120 of 310