ForumsWEPRHitler vs Stalin

310 86733
patriotboy1
offline
patriotboy1
238 posts
Nomad

(I don't think this topic was made yet).

I made this topic because people in the "Hitler vs Lenin" topic said they would have preferred this (Hitler vs Stalin).

So post what you think... I think Hitler was the better and smarter man.

http://www.noshame.org/scripts/yancey050429.htm

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=77830

  • 310 Replies
hojoko
offline
hojoko
508 posts
Peasant

No it cant.
80 million would be more then half the Soviet Union's population. I hope you can see how that makes no logical sense right?


you have to keep in mind that the deaths include German casualties, as well as Red Army casualties inflicted by the Germans (which is kind of absurd), so I would say it ranges from 10 million to 30 million.
WexMajor82
offline
WexMajor82
1,026 posts
Nomad

I put my bets on Stalin.
Hitler is too tiny to really stand a chance.
Will it be boxe or full contact?

Armpit
offline
Armpit
784 posts
Nomad

Stalin was a helpful guy as well as a killer. He revolutionized Russia, and he:

made it a more industrial country.


(just quoting myself to restate a point)

Stalin benefited more people than he killed. Hitler didn't really benefit anybody.
WexMajor82
offline
WexMajor82
1,026 posts
Nomad

Hitler grabbed Germany in the deep shit the '29 american economical crisis threw it and pulled it out.
Before him you could go grocery shopping with a million of Marks, after him Germany was again an economical powerhouse.
Try to get informed before spawning ignorance.

PanzerTank
offline
PanzerTank
1,707 posts
Nomad

How did 5 million go to 10 million to 20 million to 40 million to 60 million and now to 80 o.O

Maybe they went from wrong to right, like how people in Germany thought Hitler was good but then realized he was bad. I think the number was 60 million, and no noone start dissagreeing with me, there are multiple sites with many different opions. The truth is no one knows for sure.

I will not say who I think is worse or better because it'll lead to arguements.
Fourhand
offline
Fourhand
23 posts
Nomad

I think Stalin=worse /and/or equal to in evil than Hitler, but in economy, Hitler wins. I read a statistic somewhere about how, like, the 2-10% (I don;t know exact #, was around there)of privately owned farmed (NOT GOVERNMENT OWNED) produced somewhere from 20-40 percent of the total Russian food market. I not sure if source is credible though, think it is. Morally, I don't think some of the things that happened between 1917 and 19maybe-67 should EVER be talked about. Didn't many people starve to death around 1920's-30's? Didn't Stalin have mass decimations in his military (and, if massive deaths in military, then what about general populace, who usually get the majority of everything that happens) Ah, nevermind, half this stuff I read is from PIG guides I haven't read for a year or 3.

thelistman
offline
thelistman
1,416 posts
Shepherd

It's hard to determine the exact number that Stalin ordered killed. You have to take into account the expected population vs. real population. WWII also left 27 million Russians dead and probably stopped many people from having babies.

The generally accepted number is 20 million for Stalin. The credible sources go as low as 10 million and as high as 35 million. Obviously there are extremist pro-Stalin sources that say 1 million (and were all justified) and other extremist (anti-Stalin) sources that say 80 million. I tend to use 20 million.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

The generally accepted number is 20 million for Stalin. The credible sources go as low as 10 million and as high as 35 million. Obviously there are extremist pro-Stalin sources that say 1 million (and were all justified) and other extremist (anti-Stalin) sources that say 80 million. I tend to use 20 million.


According to Soviet archives its around 3-5 million.

The problem I have with the figure 20 million is that its includes the Ukrainian famine as a deliberate act by Stalin. The methods also used are ridiculous. They merely just subtract the real population from the expected population.

A Russian historian used this same method for calculating the number of death during the Great Depression in the US. His figure was 8 million.
tomertheking
offline
tomertheking
1,751 posts
Jester

"the standart figure historicans use is 4-10 million, not counting famine"

Wikipedia, about the number stalin killed.

TrainJumpa
offline
TrainJumpa
122 posts
Nomad

I believe they teamed up for something horrible called the Axis Forces. So why compare?

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad
tomertheking
offline
tomertheking
1,751 posts
Jester

It does look like the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. What about the 10-30 million dead russians at hitlers arms?

quakingphear
offline
quakingphear
410 posts
Peasant

I try not to rely on Soviet statistics. Their propaganda departments made so many statistics up, and a lot of the rest of the infrastructure was pretty inefficient. If anything if they acknowledged any deaths at the time to famine, they would be fairly low numbers. They tended to exaggerate production numbers and publish them for the public, or just erase or alter other documents to make the nation seem greater than it was.

But I'd have to say Stalin was far worse. Russia had one of the greater populations of the time, so famine would affect more citizens. I think another thing to consider is how the majority of deaths attributed to Stalin, at least the famine related ones are mostly from gross incompitance, and Hitler did his killings systematically. I'm not sure which way is worse.

Drace
offline
Drace
3,880 posts
Nomad

Their propaganda departments made so many statistics up


Proof?
woody_7007
offline
woody_7007
2,662 posts
Peasant

Proof?


How about the fact they reported a 0% crime rate for about half a century despite the fact Russia is pretty much run by gangsters.
Showing 76-90 of 310