-1914: a civillian ship went into warzone german teritory, waters(what a shock) it was destroyed, thats what sent america into ww1
-1939: inteligence about the japanasse attack on pearl harbor was purposfully delayed and pearl harbor with 3000 lives were destroyed.
-1955: americans lied about 3 destroyers being destroyed in vietnam, and admited too it 30 years later.
-2001: american government planted nano themite in the world trade center buildings and went too was with iraq and Afghanistan.
(9/11 inside job? seriously what else is new?)
9/11,
-Steal melting or weakening: the temperatures did not even get high enough too weaken steel like some people claim, steel weakens at 1100F, the buildings burned at 200F or less, black smoke like the ones on 9/11 means a dyin g fire.
-Buildings collapsing: this would never have happened if the laws of physics wherent bent that day, the trade centers were the strongest buildings ever built and they were made too withstand plane crashes, and then they fell because of a little fire and some structural dmg on the top floors, the trade centers are built like pyramides, with the thickest steel on the bottom and weakest on top, with a steel core in the center(these building were not coming down).
-The collapse: the buildings fell in 8 seconds, this means that the buildings dint slowly collapse on each floor and collapse again, it means before they even hit another floor the floor collapsed, otherwised this would have taken over 20 seconds.
-Molten steel: the less heard proof, in the basement and under the building they found pools of molten steel, imposible too be caused by a building collapse or jet fuel, they also found enourmes quantities of nano thermite in the dust after the collapse(witch burns at 2600f).
-First steel collapse ever: the world trade centers were the first ever steel building collapse in the history of mankind. other building have been on fire for hours on end and haven't come down since they were made out of steel.
Steel buildings don't collapse from fire, so whats left too make them collapse...the plane? no because the buildings where made too protect against plane crashes.
Yeah, but there are two buildings. The planes were moving at 400 and 500mph, I would think the steel supports would be tougher than the planes nose and wings even at that speed.
The planes were also hunks of steel, keep in mind. They almost went through the buildings - 30 floors falling at freefall speed would be enough, especially considering that the buildings were redundant in an empirical sense - taking out even a few key supports severely damaged the superstructure. After that hapened, 30 floors, falling on ifre at freefall speed, would be enough to take down the building.
Actually, we don't know that for sure - Boeing, the manufacturer of the planes used, refuses to reveal the composition of their planes because of the Sept. 11 attacks. So we don't know what metal(s) the planes are made of. (and I got this FROM the Loose Change video)
The twin towers were built to withstand the impact of an airplane larger, and heavier then what hit them in 9/11.
Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel.
They were actually built to withstand planes smaller than the ones that hit.
Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, but it doesn't need to melt to lose integrity. Metals of all kinds, including steel bend easier when exposed to high temperatures. The heat loosens up molecules in it. Also the shock from the plane would have blasted off the fire proof coat on the support beams, allowing the heat to do it's work even easier.
