I think global warming is a myth if anyone wants to prove me wrong try.
You're right, let's just keep dumping and burning our crap on the planet and nothing will ever happen. You never gave evidence of your own, to prove why you didn't believe in Global warming, you just told everyone to prove you wrong.
Commnist09 if you accutally read the other posts i did give reasons why i dont believe in it you have to read.
I meant at first, you just told people to prove you wrong without providing any information of your own, that makes you look like your science teacher told you it wasn't real so you took his word for it.
Relations in quantitative numbers does not show for massiveness, To be honest, A .5 Increase wouldn't do much to destroy the earth.
The only problem I see in the world today (Environmentally) is Loss of Habitat, Disease, Deforestation and Cutting off water to Animals.
Global Warming, Myth or not, is part of the Earth. Not only has it been recorded that compressed/trapped C02 (The majority of our Earth's planet contains it there) is within the crust of the Earth itself, not only that but Volcanic Emissions and cycles of carbon have been found as a relative regularity as part of our world. We are a speck of dust on Nature, and seeing as we still have not completely dominated our environment -- We always will be.
I'm not saying Global Warming doesn't exist. Sure, It might be me that is killing teh polar bearz too! But in the long run, Its all or nothing for Humanity.
Well because i wanted other people to tell me it was so true so i could prove them wrong.oh and my science teacher told me it was real but i dont believe him theres evidence thats its not real if you read my other posts.
The only problem I see in the world today (Environmentally) is Loss of Habitat, Disease, Deforestation and Cutting off water to Animals.
Yeah...those are pretty bad.
Global Warming, Myth or not, is part of the Earth. Not only has it been recorded that compressed/trapped C02 (The majority of our Earth's planet contains it there) is within the crust of the Earth itself, not only that but Volcanic Emissions and cycles of carbon have been found as a relative regularity as part of our world. We are a speck of dust on Nature, and seeing as we still have not completely dominated our environment -- We always will be.
Agreed. The ocean is releasing Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere as we speak.
According to Brook, if future climate change causes a similar change in North Atlantic circulation, there may be an extra release of carbon dioxide from the deep ocean. "But this is speculative because conditions during the glacial period were different," he stressed.
Changes COULD release carbon dioxide. But it hasn't, not yet. The ocean still represent a huge carbon sink.
Changes COULD release carbon dioxide. But it hasn't, not yet. The ocean still represent a huge carbon sink.
The natural warming of the earth is increasing it's temperature, and therefore increasing the oceans temperature.
The temperature of the water determines how much gas may be held in solution. As the water warms it releases retained gas to the atmosphere this is why water in tropical regions retains less gas in solution than it does in temperate or artic regions. In cold regions the water will absorb gas from the atmosphere as it cools.
The temperature of the water determines how much gas may be held in solution. As the water warms it releases retained gas to the atmosphere this is why water in tropical regions retains less gas in solution than it does in temperate or artic regions.
The gas in solution isn't the only thing, creatures that live in the oceans the photosynthesize. These trap carbon, and a lot of it sinks, and that biomass represents trapped carbon.
There is more warm ocean than cool.
Those are surface ocean currents. Most of the cold water in the ocean is located below the surface.
I meant to life's existence as a hole -- (The Speck of Dust part)
And sorry, I meant to say an increase to .5%, as you pointed out the chaos of putting .3% into textbooks would make highschoolers think of mass planet destruction (Not)
And I don't think it would kill all macrolife, seeing as throughout the stages of life the Earth has lost and gained loads of C02, Dying down from a near .9-the usual 2.5% or whatever it dropped to to the time of the human bipedaled d00d.
Also, Its fair to assume that the biomass of the dead photosynthesizing bacterial plankton/nonbacterial plants is nothing in comparison to the size and the dramatic temperature change of the Oceans and the amount of carbon they hold beneath their weighted pressure. Only the shallow parts of the ocean even have plants that photosynthesize.
