ForumsWEPRWater on the Moon?

49 9361
Bronze
offline
Bronze
2,417 posts
Shepherd

Apparently.

I just happened to hear it on CNN, couldn't believe it. So I looked on the site and found the article [url]http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/11/13/water.moon.nasa/index.html[/url]

What do you guys and gals think about that? What does it mean for the future of the Earth? Humantiy?

  • 49 Replies
iamsuperawesome
offline
iamsuperawesome
201 posts
Nomad

diddnt see that coming, wouldnt it be irridated because we hit it with a warhead?

MarioMario
offline
MarioMario
1,212 posts
Peasant

Well mif they found water on the moon that could mean their is other life their.

Haku1234567890
offline
Haku1234567890
1,720 posts
Nomad

water is not helping if there isn't any air

TheDude42
offline
TheDude42
1,026 posts
Nomad

There might be, but what would that prove?

rafterman
offline
rafterman
600 posts
Nomad

This will make any lunar outpost cheaper and possibly easier depending on how easy it is to extract the water in large amounts.
And its not really a world event.

Khronic
offline
Khronic
155 posts
Nomad

Water means this:


It can be transformed into other compounds we can use, such as oxygen (There is oxygen in water) and fuel(hydrogen). Because of this, we can easily support life on a moon base with the aid of water on the moon.

MarioMario
offline
MarioMario
1,212 posts
Peasant

Water means this:
It can be transformed into other compounds we can use, such as oxygen (There is oxygen in water) and fuel(hydrogen). Because of this, we can easily support life on a moon base with the aid of water on the moon.


What he said .But yeah we probably live their in about 50 years or more or less
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

water is not helping if there isn't


Actually, the first life was bacteria that did not need air. In fact, they are what led to the creation of the atmosphere. As to the water being on the dark side of the moon, I can understand that because it is constantly frozen and we would not be able to see it. If the article had said something about it being where we could see it I would have thought it faked. But, it makes sense, as far as I know no one has gone to the dark side of the moon till now.
Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

Actually, the first life was bacteria that did not need air. In fact, they are what led to the creation of the atmosphere. As to the water being on the dark side of the moon, I can understand that because it is constantly frozen and we would not be able to see it. If the article had said something about it being where we could see it I would have thought it faked. But, it makes sense, as far as I know no one has gone to the dark side of the moon till now.


Oops, the quote got cut off, the real quote was
water is not helping if there isn't any air
Bronze
offline
Bronze
2,417 posts
Shepherd

Ok, so it would make it easier for a moonbase? Since it is on the dark side of the Moon I would guess that we would have to build a pipline of sorts, because I'm not sure we could live on the darkside.

And its not really a world event.


You are kidding right?
rafterman
offline
rafterman
600 posts
Nomad

You are kidding right?

Pretty much.
Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

It can be transformed into other compounds we can use, such as oxygen (There is oxygen in water) and fuel(hydrogen). Because of this, we can easily support life on a moon base with the aid of water on the moon.


Exactly.

This is a huge world event. Although I don't know if Obama is big on space exploration...

NASA says we're going to be living there by 2020, but it seems a bit unrealistic to me.
dudeguy45
offline
dudeguy45
2,917 posts
Peasant

OMG. I need to inform the good people of Facebook!

Khronic
offline
Khronic
155 posts
Nomad

It would be VERY hard to actually live on the moon though, the moon spins just like earth, the dark side of the moon is about 50 degrees Celsius cooler they the light side of the moon, meaning we would need some pretty good shelter.


Isn't this already accomplished on space stations?

The real problem is radiation. If you were to, say, live on a moonbase for about 3 years, chances are you would die from radiation that exsists in space. The tactical advantage of having a lunar base is almost 0 when we could just send lunar rovers to get any data we need on the moon.
Blu3sBr0s
offline
Blu3sBr0s
1,287 posts
Nomad

The tactical advantage of having a lunar base is almost 0 when we could just send lunar rovers to get any data we need on the moon.


Yes but it icnreases our awesomeness level by +10

So...yeah...think about THAT.
Showing 1-15 of 49