Do you have actual numbers supporting the "very unlikely" chance of God (e.g. 1:10, 1:20, etc)? While it isn't wrong, per se, you also can't bring up DISPROOF for the said claim either. Making it a stalemate and once again: it has boiled down to "we don't know."
Its a pharse. no need to get all an*l about numbers. There is so much disproof for God its not even funny.
I'm confused as to which part your referring to. Is it the starting at a single organism? Then if so, you must be the one who graduated from special ed science. The latter part was more of a joke (you can see that when I say "Anyways, that's just a theory and I don't really believe in it). And it does offer a scenario where God is plausible.
The whole thing is ridiculous. For even suggesting it earned you a facepalm. How am I the retarded one for pointing out that the big crunch didn't not destroy this "erfect being's" genes .Your "theory" has absolutely no fu**ing proof.
Its a pharse. no need to get all an*l about numbers. There is so much disproof for God its not even funny.
Well he said "not likely" therefore he must have some numbers backing him up, he can't just randomly throw out claims like that. And please, point out all this disproof.
The whole thing is ridiculous. For even suggesting it earned you a facepalm. How am I the retarded one for pointing out that the big crunch didn't not destroy this "erfect being's" genes .Your "theory" has absolutely no fu**ing proof.
Seems like you didn't notice I was a joke, nor you read my post properly. Of course your not retarded for saying that theory (THAT WAS MADE AS A JOKE CAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE YOU STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT) is wrong. (But actually, if the perfect being truly is 100% perfect, it could do anything and not die ever.) I said you would be retarded if you believed in evolution but didn't think all life came from a single organism.
While some of them don't start out as theist-hate threads, quite a bit of them do. Such as this one. And the "The MAIN reason I am an atheist." and "Perversion of Religion" and "Is religion insanity?" and "Question your faith in your religion" and many more just flat out start by attacking theism.
Making attack threads is fun. If you can not defend your reasoning, then you are not fit to be of that religion. The greatest part is that no one tends to attack atheism. In fact, I invite anyone to create a topic attaking atheism; please do so.
Oh, and is it Really such a bad thing to challenge something in which you do not believe in?
Exactly. Evolution has to start from A SINGLE ORGANISM. What makes it so hard to accept the fact that a super organism was the first to evolve to the point of absolute perfection in his whole species, and didn't have the chance to pass on his ultimate genes to the next generation because the Big Crunch or whatever happens? Anyways, that's just a theory, and I don't really believe it. I simply thought it up to prove the point that God is indeed plausible. :/
lol! Another special ed science graduate.
It's nice to see people who offer plausible rebuttals! Shame you're not one of them...
Making attack threads is fun. If you can not defend your reasoning, then you are not fit to be of that religion. The greatest part is that no one tends to attack atheism. In fact, I invite anyone to create a topic attaking atheism; please do so.
Look at the forum. There's plenty. I'm refering to "Why don't you believe in God?" and "Why do atheists celebrate Christmas?" specifically.
Oh, and is it Really such a bad thing to challenge something in which you do not believe in?
No, but I've noticed most atheists challenge it with a burning passion rather harshly, making it persecution. Simple challenging and trying to get them to actually think about their beliefs isn't work, but just flat out saying that all their opinions on religion is wrong is 'really that bad.'
It's nice to see people who offer plausible rebuttals! Shame you're not one of them...
It's nice to see people who know how cells and other microscopic organisms multiply! Shame you're not one of them...
I said you would be retarded if you believed in evolution but didn't think all life came from a single organism.
I'm guess I'm a retard then. >_<
Life did not originate from one single cell. There are several different places in the ocean that could host the first lifeforms. If only a single place could host life... then there would be little migration and very little diversity, because all the organisms would have the same environment.
Making attack threads is fun. If you can not defend your reasoning, then you are not fit to be of that religion.
If someone can't defend their reasoning, then maybe they are just an illogical person. Maybe, no matter what faith they have, they can't defend it. They can't be theists because they can't defend themselves. They can't be atheists because they can't defend themselves. They can't be agnostics because they can't defend themselves. There's really no point in making an attack thread. Just post your attack IN one of the many other religious threads.
Oh, and is it Really such a bad thing to challenge something in which you do not believe in?
No, but I get very irritated when people are rude about it. I have discussions with atheists and agnostics about religion, and they challenge me without insulting me. It's really not that hard. Actually, when you phrase your argument as an attack, it makes you look close-minded and intolerant, which generally doesn't help your case.
Life did not originate from one single cell. There are several different places in the ocean that could host the first lifeforms. If only a single place could host life... then there would be little migration and very little diversity, because all the organisms would have the same environment.
While the ocean could support life in many different areas, think about abiogenesis. The chances of all the elements to be needed in more than one place on the same planet and then all bond together to create DNA and proteins is rather low isn't it? The created organism than multiplied and slowly got more advanced, and eventually gained the ability to go onto land. On the land, it also started getting more and more advanced, letting it migrate to different environments. Eventually, the organisms became so advanced, that Homo sapiens sapiens were created.
Lol, sorry I misunderstood you. You quoted both of us, and made it look like you were agreeing with me being retarded for making up a theory that I spent a whole 30 seconds think of. =P
While the ocean could support life in many different areas, think about abiogenesis. The chances of all the elements to be needed in more than one place on the same planet and then all bond together to create DNA and proteins is rather low isn't it?
Why would it be low? Earth was very volcanically active back in the day. The Pacific Ocean *maybe even the Atlantic, gotta check the ocean floor map* is riddled with volcanic hot spots, both extinct and active. Go back a few hundred million years, and you'll find that the Ocean was very geothermal...
