well if any of u r familiar with the law of conservation and mass, then u know that it states that matter cannot be created from nothing, or completely destroyed. so evolutionists say this, then turn around and say the big bang created the universe as we know it. WTF!!?!?!?!the universe went from non existent to existent in a fraction of a nanosecond! and where did the bigbang come from? nothing? nope, because if the law of conservation and mass is true, then the bigbang isnt. simple...
ill have to sai big bang cuz ive seen proof of it and i see no proofs of good creating the universe. i believe that god saved ppl but i dont believe that he created the universe
Yes, but if Earth were in it's place with it's moon it would be a livable enviroment, that was the original point. There might not be the same amount of temperate land and ice ages could potentially bring out even larger extintions, but the fact remains that there's a relatively large window of opurtunity within a solar system where energy flow from the star or stars is great enough to sustain life.
Now that I've investigated a little more, Mars seems to be on the very outskirt of the habitable zone. This is an extremely precarious situation; Mars sometimes receives enough but other times receives too little. Not only that, but the farther out you are from the "habitable zone," you need more carbon dioxide and the less oxygen to keep the temperature suitable, but from Mars' position there would be too much carbon dioxide to sustain life. The point is twofold: Life is not something that we can just have a warm pool of minerals and have something come out of it, and actual habitableness must be taken with all factors into account, not divorced from each other into a point by point scheme.
Now that I've investigated a little more, Mars seems to be on the very outskirt of the habitable zone. This is an extremely precarious situation; Mars sometimes receives enough but other times receives too little. Not only that, but the farther out you are from the "habitable zone," you need more carbon dioxide and the less oxygen to keep the temperature suitable, but from Mars' position there would be too much carbon dioxide to sustain life. The point is twofold: Life is not something that we can just have a warm pool of minerals and have something come out of it, and actual habitableness must be taken with all factors into account, not divorced from each other into a point by point scheme.
You're right, but the point I was trying to make was that the habitable zone is much larger then 10,000 feet either way. Even if we went a million miles in one direction or the other the Earth would still be within a comfortable habitable zone. Besides, if we were farther away we would probably have a different biologic history. I'm not saying that everything would be the same .5 AU from here, but rather it would still be possible to sustain life.
The last time someone pulled that one on me, I slapped them in the face. When they asked why I had slapped them, I replied: "Why do you suddenly assume that I slapped your face for a reason? You can't prove what can't be seen by your eyes."
God = Lie Maybe big bang create the earth !! God is just an ilusion in the mind of the ignorants !! who cant solve problems by him/her self !!! ! " F%#K God "
Religion is atheory that was created to explain things people in the past couldn't understand. It has been replaced by science and is no longer needed. Just as some of newtons theories were replaced by einsteins. if you want proof just watch a TV chanel you don't recieve and part of that is Cosmic Background Radiaation you can watch the the start of the universe
