well if any of u r familiar with the law of conservation and mass, then u know that it states that matter cannot be created from nothing, or completely destroyed. so evolutionists say this, then turn around and say the big bang created the universe as we know it. WTF!!?!?!?!the universe went from non existent to existent in a fraction of a nanosecond! and where did the bigbang come from? nothing? nope, because if the law of conservation and mass is true, then the bigbang isnt. simple...
O-k Samy so I whould be blinded because sciences use the laws of logics and physics to prove phenomenons that have been studied and approved by these same laws that rule the universe.And you would tell me that I'm blinded because I can't accept such thing as a god;a supernatural power that could have created the entire cosmos and still let is followers dies because the roof in a church crumbled and fell on 200 people.I'm not blind,I'm just realist,but when you see me on the day of the final judgement,I give you the right to come see me and say ''see,I told you''.If the day of final judgement comes one ay that is...I hope so because I'll surely be tired of waiting on the first circle of hell since I don't believe in god
First of all, the law of conservation and mass cannot be used to disprove the big bang.
There are theories, the most detailed would be the M theory (look it up if you're interested, it does get scientific, be prepared.)
I don't believe scientific evidence has ever shown, or tried to show, there is no god.
Correct, even Darwin said "I don't see why my discovery would offend people's religious beliefs," something along those lines :\\
The Big Bang "before" theory states that everything was plotted up into a litttle ball of awesomeness..
I believe he was asking how that little ball of awesomeness was created, to which I redirected him to the M theory (note there are many others that attempt to explain it, but most are incomplete.)
I am not saying that the science stuff isn't real or facts but im saying god did them.
You're saying scientists plagiarized God's work? I don't think scientists like to hear that.
it makes no sense, there is no theory, but if you could prove a theory to me, i would give you all my money.
Ehm... if it could be proven it would be a fact.
This makes perfect sence, seeing as the Big Bang theory can acctually prove the bible (kind of) right. So they should be working together, not against eachother.
It's not that part of the Bible that makes it hard to believe, erase all the crap and I'd be willing to 'work together.' No intention of drifting this topic somewhere else but unless the Adam 'n' Eve story was metaphorical I'm not willing to mix science and logic with faith and no evidence.
Cosmic Background Radiation.
Argument should've ended when this was bought up.
You think there was a giant supernova or something in which just creating the WHOLE universe? The subject of christianity makes much more sense
Yes, of course, God "just made it" makes sense. I assume you think Christianity's explaination of the existance of humans makes more sense too? A man and a woman were having sex on the clouds and were thrown down, and out of all the galaxies, solar systems and planets, they landed on Earth. Unharmed, of course, by the impact when they hit the ground.
Hahahahaha XD I thought I'd be chickening out of this one because I'm tired to try to prove the obvious but it's becoming very funny. Of course the explanation of god creating the universe would be simple enough:that's what chatolicism wanted:something efficient to control the masses.You know what's funny?it's that chatolicism is the invention of science.It was invented to efficiently control the people and it worked in the times of need humanity was facing.Religion for us occidentals is but a tool,a tool that's starting to rust and will break soon enough...
Catholicism is a broader term to say christiannism because I wanted to refer to all religious organism who promoted the existence of a supernatural power in the occidental culture,thus catholicism.
Well yeah I must have been out of my mind for a few seconds there. By religious organism I meant all kind of deviancy of christianism. Sorry if it kind of sounds foggy from time to time I'm a french
"Sigh" what makes me mad is both of the two people above me are ignorant about the side that they are arguing against, and both are intolarant of any belief but theirs.
