What you think about it? Personally I find it's much better than MW2, the realism is much better, the maps, Squads, destructible ground, and the animations (Hello? R700 reload on Call of Duty 4!)...
As well as the official names on BF: BC II, Thumper was a nickname on MW2, and others on CoD4, R700 = M24, the M24 reload on the Demo of BF: BC II looks much better and, more pro.
MW2 was a good step up, in many ways, but it does not do some of the most SIMPLE things which should have come first. Shotguns / Machine Pistol / Launcher as secondary < Destructible Ground. Variety of Perks < Class specific bonuses (Medics, anyone?) New kinds of Campaign Detail < Vehicles. Variety of Weapons / Out-Dated Weapons < Maps and amount of players allowed. Knifing Damage (seriously...) < Squads? That's an easy one!
Those are the main ones, and Battlefield does seem more experianced in how to manage the games properly, go BF BC II!
I played the demo on PS3 and I actually didn't like it. The graphics sucks and the gameplay is too slow... Hay anyone else played it on the PS3? I was a bit disappointed...
Thats because you played it on the PS3.. they suckxxx
Thats because you played it on the PS3.. they suckxxx
PS3 doesn't suck just this game on PS3
o, you like "get on and start fighting" games like MW2 That ain't how real war games go. There's actual thinking involved in this game. If anything, the graphics AND gameplay is better, because war zones are never close up in one area at all; they are spread apart and actually has positions to take.
I don't like MW2 that much, it gets pretty boring... I also like tactical shooters but somehow in BBC2 the aiming and moving etc. is too slow, I think(at least on PS3). And on PS3 the graphics really suck (in the demo)... I heard that it's better on the PC...
I also like tactical shooters but somehow in BBC2 the aiming and moving etc. is too slow, I think(at least on PS3). And on PS3 the graphics really suck (in the demo)... I heard that it's better on the PC...
Ladies and gentleman, we hath foundeth our problem.
Taken from another thread by Yours Truly:
[quote=Freakenstein]PC has been, and will always be better than consoles, gameplay wise and graphics wise. They will always surpass consoles because PCs are adaptable and flexible in terms of tweaking settings. Did you know that a controller sucks compared to a mouse when you're trying to be succinct with aiming? Obviously the sensitivity on the mouse is much more vast than say, 5 noticeable differences on a slider. You have two sticks: for moving, and for moving the camera angle. The sensitivity settings for the stick is less vast than what the mouse is capable of doing. Halo for instance has only 7 significant settings, while the same game on PC is a gradual change; moving the slider back and forth, basically. Playing on the PC is less crowded. The typical buttons for walking is WASD style. Then you have the mouse acting as aim and fire. Pressing a trigger button restricts the movement of your thumbs for both sticks. You are not able to comfortably move and aim while you are shooting when you are playing with the stick. With the PC however, you have a whole free hand just for moving, and another free hand for aiming and firing. Are you able to jump while continuously aiming on a stick? No. PC? Yes. Hurray for the thumbs and space bar! How would you aim with the scope? You push in the aim button. That again restricts aiming? What would PC do? Right-click. You could still aim fluid as water while aiming ever so carefully with a sniper rifle and succinctly picking off an unaware enemy.[/quote]
A little big, but explains why your moving and aiming is so slow: Because you're playing a console shooter! Who woulda thunk it? ;-)
Thats because you played it on the PS3.. they suckxxx
Don't start that argument, Freakenstein wrote it for meh Xbox = Hardcore Gamers PS3 = Casual Gamers You should know the reasons...
I don't like MW2 that much, it gets pretty boring... I also like tactical shooters but somehow in BBC2 the aiming and moving etc. is too slow, I think(at least on PS3). And on PS3 the graphics really suck (in the demo)... I heard that it's better on the PC...
Yh so you prefer hiding behind a wall, someone shooting a crap inaccurate RPG, hits the wall and nothing happens. Or do you prefer a sprint from behind a wall, you throw a medic to heal yourself but he aims an RPG somewhere near your position - he shoots, you get hurt but it was only your right side, now you're scared xD
MW2 gets old really fast unfortunately i am unable to pick up my pre ordered copy at gamestop because everyone in my family has the flu and I can't drive!!!!
