ForumsPopular MediaHow Has Twilight Affected your view of Vampires?

113 35699
ulimitedpower
offline
ulimitedpower
1,739 posts
Nomad

Ah, I so felt like posting this...

Well, we all know that the Twilight saga has brought in massive rewards, and it's like Harry Potter all over again. A huge number love it and almost as many hate it (Research indicates the top reason is fans). And quite a few series have jumped out of nowhere based on the series.

But I find the books (And movies) have all changed our opinion of one thing: Vampires. Book lovers now see the 'Cold One' as appealing and sexy, while haters... Drop dead.

I'm just curious as to how people feel about this. Do you like the fact vampires have been changed so dramatically? If so, how?

  • 113 Replies
Pazx
offline
Pazx
5,845 posts
Peasant

Yes.

But then I watched Rosario + Vampire and my beliefs were restored.

ilberic
offline
ilberic
858 posts
Jester

It's made them extremely dull, soft, and annoying... and I haven't even seen the movies. Just the previews are enough to make me hate it.

Strop
offline
Strop
10,816 posts
Bard

Real vampires don't sparkle.

In fact, 'real' vampires are thought to be based upon those who suffer from a group of disorders known as porphyria. Essentially, this involves a failure to produce haemoglobin, which results in anaemia. Certain subtypes of porphyria also cause photosensitivity. But it's hard to say whether the origins of vampiric folklore actually relate to porphyria itself, since the features of vampires have changed over the ages and medical documentation certainly doesn't follow the definitions we now use!

Binary_Illusion
offline
Binary_Illusion
299 posts
Jester

In fact, 'real' vampires are thought to be based upon those who suffer from a group of disorders known as porphyria. Essentially, this involves a failure to produce haemoglobin, which results in anaemia. Certain subtypes of porphyria also cause photosensitivity. But it's hard to say whether the origins of vampiric folklore actually relate to porphyria itself, since the features of vampires have changed over the ages and medical documentation certainly doesn't follow the definitions we now use!


Oh I do so love your medical point of view Mr. Strop.
And indeed, vampires do not sparkle. I haven't read any of the books or watched any of the movies. But a vampire is like the 70s and 80s Dracula, you know the one that kills everyone sucks their blood and is merciless. Vampires were originally killers, not a pretty boy that falls in love with a clumsy girl and has to fight a werewolf.
There are in fact some accounts of real vampires. Or at least people drinking the blood of others, but then there are "modern" plays with blood that I won't even go into.
assassin89
offline
assassin89
1,303 posts
Nomad

It made vampires puffy they are meant to be brutal monsters. But now they are just moody guys who have so many problems and fall i love with some girl who cant act (thats you Kisten Stewart, yeah we all know it).

emmalouc1
offline
emmalouc1
516 posts
Nomad

Now, i think NOSFERATU is the only cool vampire. Twilight portrays vampires as sexy sluts...

MrDayCee
offline
MrDayCee
14,745 posts
King

This saga made the Vampires look kinder to humans, well... at least a few are, but not all!

I thought the second movie 'New Moon' was lesser than the first 'Twilight' though... :S
It really had 'inbetween' written allover it...

Let's see what the final chapter 'Eclips' has to offer when it comes out! =D

assassin89
offline
assassin89
1,303 posts
Nomad

Let's see what the final chapter 'Eclips' has to offer when it comes out! =D

Firstly its not the final chapter its the third Breaking Dawn is the last. And secondly have u seen the trailer it looks awful.
ulimitedpower
offline
ulimitedpower
1,739 posts
Nomad

Amazing. I just thought I might check what happened to this thread, and it was still on the front page. Amazing...

It made me appreciate Dracula a lot more,


You're right. Vampires used to be Dracula and buddies, now it's turned into full love series. WB even has a series.
Firstly its not the final chapter its the third Breaking Dawn is the last. And secondly have u seen the trailer it looks awful.


When I watched the two current movies (Under pressure from my surroundings) I was astounded how some scenes were so unrealistic. They should have tested it with audiences (Who are not Twilight fans) before releasing.
This saga made the Vampires look kinder to humans, well... at least a few are, but not all!


The goriest thing I think in the second one was:
'Ok people come along! This way to the dining hall!'
*Hundreds of people shuffle past Bella, Edy and co.
'AAAAAAaaaaaarghhhhh'

You don't see anything. So we can only guess what really happened.

I feel Twilight has ruined the image of vampires. And as Stephen King put it:

"the real difference [between J. K. Rowling and Meyer] is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer, and Stephenie Meyer can't write worth a darn. She's not very good."

My mom read the first book and told me it was true. Stephenie Meyer has no talent for writing. She rambles and repeats herself over pages.
Ok, stop refering to the people in Twilight as vampires. They aren't.


A mod post! Yes, the cast isn't made of vampires (At least I hope). It's made of teenagers who are trying out the movie business.
Naruto
offline
Naruto
658 posts
Nomad

My only problem with the books is that vampires shoulds sparkle. Its kinda wierd i think but that just my opinion.

Ernie15
offline
Ernie15
13,344 posts
Bard

I disagree, I think vampires should not sparkle. When they go outside in daylight hours, they should turn to dust, not sparkle in the sun.

Graham
offline
Graham
8,051 posts
Nomad

Fun to make fun of. *AMG my skin is so sparkly!*

it makes me like van helsing's interpretation more.

cobrakarate
offline
cobrakarate
104 posts
Nomad

It really makes vampires seem stupid and wussy oh yeah and vampires don't fucking sparlke they blister and burn!!!!!

thoadthetoad
offline
thoadthetoad
5,642 posts
Peasant

Twilight hasn't affected my view of vampires as a whole, but instead of the modernly liked vampire.

I still see vampires as savage, bloodthirsty animals. The book even held a (VERY LITTLE BIT) true to this. They still wanted to eat the living shit out of Bella. They were still hunters and killers. But their weaknesses were f*cked, therefore the movie and book sucked balls.

Point being: I still think that Vampires have the capibility to be bloodthirsty, poonthirsty, manipulative evil creatures. Though they should not have the ability to procreate, only to infect more individuals with vampiric blood.

skater_kid_who_pwns
offline
skater_kid_who_pwns
4,375 posts
Blacksmith

I remember when vampires used to suck blood...not di*k

Showing 16-30 of 113