Forums → WEPR → Those Angry, Insane, Racial Slurring, Tea Party People

93	15170

offline

Krizaz

2,399 posts

Nomad

Posted April 14, '10 12:19am UTC

"I haven't seen anything like this since the 1960's"
- Congressman

Racial

Is it that sad?
Is it that horrid that we are going back to the days of racial discrimination?
Are we really sinking to this low?
Conservatives suck. Well, they did, until they started doing this sh*t. Now they're screwing up our f-ing country, so they suck even more.

From actual witnesses at the Tea Party demonstrations, many of the heard things like:
N-Word
"White Boy"
Gay

This is just really f*cking sad. I'm not kidding, I never "swear" like this in a post, now I'm just ticked.

Anger

I can sort of understand this, we're passing a bill that 49% of the nation wants, and 49% doesn't. But is this really the answer to our problems? No, it's not.

Insane

Scare Tactics

f*ck whoever made this. you can't compare a great/good/ok change to Hitler.

I am just f*cking ticked - Didn't catch that earlier, now you did.

"I haven't seen anything like this since the 1960's"\r\n- Congressman\r\n\r\n\r\n[b]Racial[/b]\r\n\r\n\r\nIs it that sad?\r\nIs it that horrid that we are going back to the days of racial discrimination?\r\nAre we really sinking to this low? \r\nConservatives suck. Well, they did, until they started doing this sh*t. Now they're screwing up our f-ing country, so they suck even more.\r\n\r\nFrom actual witnesses at the Tea Party demonstrations, many of the heard things like:\r\nN-Word\r\n"White Boy" \r\nGay\r\n\r\nThis is just really f*cking sad. I'm not kidding, I never "swear" like this in a post, now I'm just ticked.\r\n\r\n[b]Anger[/b]\r\n\r\nI can sort of understand this, we're passing a bill that 49% of the nation wants, and 49% doesn't. But is this really the answer to our problems? No, it's not.\r\n\r\n[b]Insane[/b]\r\n\r\nScare Tactics\r\n[img]http://earthhopenetwork.net/obama_change_hitler_lenin-mdm.jpg[/img]\r\n\r\nf*ck whoever made this. you can't compare a great/good/ok change to Hitler.\r\n\r\n[b]I am just f*cking ticked[/b] - Didn't catch that earlier, now you did.

93 Replies

offline

Asherlee

5,001 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 7:51pm UTC

I will. gotta find my wii keyboard first. so hard to type right now.

i am going to lose my head in the all things marijuana topic bc i cant type enough.

offline

Graham

8,051 posts

Nomad

Posted April 16, '10 8:09pm UTC

I generally don't come to this forum for politics because any right-ish post I'd make is bashed by 10 people and yelled at for proof by another 5. (hyperbole)

Let's observe the title of this thread.

Angry, Insane, Racial Slurring, Tea Party People

As soon as a group forms for something, the opposition will slander it as much as they can for various things as not being 'olitically correct'.

Not as terrible as the likes of Hitler, but he has lied to the country.

What's stopping him from lying even more then?

Concentrate on the bad, and you'll never see the good.[quote]Tell me the good.

[/quote]

You'll have to see it on your own.

offline

Asherlee

5,001 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 8:13pm UTC

No, I am asking you what the good is from you.

offline

Graham

8,051 posts

Nomad

Posted April 16, '10 8:14pm UTC

People are trying to voice their opinion.

offline

Asherlee

5,001 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 8:21pm UTC

Do you not think there is more to it than that? I'm not sure that just voicing an opinion is considered "good."

offline

Graham

8,051 posts

Nomad

Posted April 16, '10 8:23pm UTC

Do you not think there is more to it than that?

There's always more to everything.

I'm not sure that just voicing an opinion is considered "good."

Wouldn't you say being unable to voice your opinion is bad?

offline

NoNameC68

5,043 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 9:14pm UTC

You should be careful when plucking apart paragraphs. If you take two sentences and answer them separately, you might just miss the main point, which it seems you have.

If I'm wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me!

Do you not think there is more to it than that?

in which you replied

There's always more to everything.

Your reply was somewhat redundant.

Quote:I'm not sure that just voicing an opinion is considered "good."

She's not saying that it's wrong to voice an opinion.
She was questioning if an opinion alone is necessarily good.

If you put the sentences together, you get this...

Do you not think there is more to it than that? I'm not sure that just voicing an opinion is considered "good."

Which was a reply too...

People are trying to voice their opinion.

So what she's asking is this...

You said they are voicing their opinion as if to justify their actions. Are their actions justifiable simply because they are voicing their opinion, or is there more to it than just that? Please explain.

Like I said, I could be wrong, but I'm tired of people dissecting paragraphs rather than taking them in whole. It's something I'm probably guilty of too, which is something I'm going to start watching out for when I post.

You should be careful when plucking apart paragraphs. If you take two sentences and answer them separately, you might just miss the main point, which it seems you have.\r\n\r\nIf I'm wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me! \r\n\r\n[quote]Do you not think there is more to it than that? [/quote]\r\n\r\nin which you replied\r\n\r\n[quote]There's always more to everything.[/quote]\r\n\r\nYour reply was somewhat redundant.\r\n\r\nQuote:I'm not sure that [i]just[/i] voicing an opinion is considered "good."\r\n\r\n\r\nShe's not saying that it's wrong to voice an opinion. \r\nShe was questioning if an opinion alone is necessarily good.\r\n\r\nIf you put the sentences together, you get this...\r\n\r\n[quote]Do you not think there is more to it than that? I'm not sure that just voicing an opinion is considered "good."[/quote]\r\n\r\nWhich was a reply too...\r\n\r\n[quote]People are trying to voice their opinion.[/quote]\r\n\r\nSo what she's asking is this...\r\n\r\nYou said they are voicing their opinion as if to justify their actions. Are their actions justifiable simply because they are voicing their opinion, or is there more to it than just that? Please explain. \r\n\r\nLike I said, I could be wrong, but I'm tired of people dissecting paragraphs rather than taking them in whole. It's something I'm probably guilty of too, which is something I'm going to start watching out for when I post.

offline

Asherlee

5,001 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 9:30pm UTC

Exactly that!

Noname, i need to hire you as my re-explainer.

;o)

offline

NoNameC68

5,043 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 9:37pm UTC

Exactly that!

Noname, i need to hire you as my re-explainer.

;o)

If you look at this thread, you will notice the same thing happening to me. = /

offline

Asherlee

5,001 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 16, '10 9:53pm UTC

It's that the most frustrating thing in the world!?

It drives me bonkers! It's like cheating in a debate.us

offline

wajor59

909 posts

Nomad

Posted April 16, '10 10:18pm UTC

i need more. But i am drinking tea currently.

I have not been keeping up to date with the Tea Parties. Links would be nice. Thanks.

I needed more proof, too, and I knew that Graham wasn't going to even bother. Sometimes, Asherlee, you have to know when to back off and let the children get themselves in trouble.

offline

adios194

818 posts

Nomad

Posted April 17, '10 12:41am UTC

What's stopping him from lying even more then?

Nothing, he is a liar. That's what I meant.

Wouldn't you say being unable to voice your opinion is bad?

No, you are supposed to voice your opinion. Nothing should shut you up on what you believe in.

and let the children get themselves in trouble.

I don't really get this, please explain what your are implying.

offline

Graham

8,051 posts

Nomad

Posted April 17, '10 1:47am UTC

Are their actions justifiable simply because they are voicing their opinion, or is there more to it than just that? Please explain.

Their action of forming groups is justified and protected by the constitution.. Anyone's opinion is justifiable by their own person. Don't really know how to answer other than that.

and I knew that Graham wasn't going to even bother.

Maybe I'm not constantly here? O_o

let the children get themselves in trouble.

What's that supposed to mean? >.>

offline

wajor59

909 posts

Nomad

Posted April 17, '10 2:17am UTC

and let the children get themselves in trouble.

I don't really get this, please explain what your are implying.

and I knew that Graham wasn't going to even bother.

Maybe I'm not constantly here? O_o

let the children get themselves in trouble.

What's that supposed to mean? >.>

Graham, I was addressing Asherlee and Nemo, because of the banter on page4. Start back at the top of that page and read to my comment and I hope you catch my wit!

Nemo's request was totally ignored until I commented and added the link. That link is what I was referring to you not even bothering to look up. Get it? Got it? Good!

Ok, Adios?

offline

Asherlee

5,001 posts

Shepherd

Posted April 17, '10 2:15pm UTC

Graham, you still haven't answered my posts. Show me the good.

First
1
2
3
4
5
Last

Showing 31-45 of 93

Categories

Quests

Community

Forums → WEPR → Those Angry, Insane, Racial Slurring, Tea Party People