ForumsWEPRWW3... Who would win?

213 51436
Sporemaniac777
offline
Sporemaniac777
1,373 posts
Nomad

The title says the most but I will repeat it. If there would be a WW3 what country would win?

  • 213 Replies
kingofwar1234
offline
kingofwar1234
603 posts
Peasant

Well, if there was a WW3 .... We would probably blow the world to pieces with nukes... some of america's most powerfull nukes could blow up half of the world!

CalvinKidd137
offline
CalvinKidd137
888 posts
Nomad

Well what are the alliances. The US and Britain would probably win anyways

ChillzMaster
offline
ChillzMaster
1,434 posts
Nomad

Well what are the alliances. The US and Britain would probably win anyways


It's very up-in-the-air about who's on what side, but there are a few basic guidelines we can predict. France, Germany, UK, and USA will be on one side of the conflict. The probable other side would be... China, North Korea, or maybe Middle East alliance #33.

Russia is a wild-card. It would either see WW3 as a re-opening of old wounds with the Western European nations, or Russia could see the conflict as a chance to redeem itself in the eyes of its neighbors. Russia has had to prove itself time and time again over its 2-millennial lifespan to countries like Sweden, France, Germany, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Britain, Spain, and Japan that its a competent country in terms of economical, political, and social practices.

The probable scenario would be as such - China and US get into heated arguments over... probably Korea, but China has a habit of keeping NK under a leash, but its the most probable. It could also stem from a mega-capitalist or mega-communist rising in the USA or PRC respectively and declaring war. (This is most probable, seeing as how Your Friendly Neighborhood Satanist is destined to become President of the USA, and if you're American, you know one thing, You. Hate. Commies.)

The UK joins in with the US almost instantly because of the "Special Relationship", quickly followed by past members of the British Empire (South Africa, India, Australia, Canada, etc.) and the rest of Western Europe. Russia and Mongolia might also jump into the fray against China, and Pakistan might invade India if the country joins the other Commonwealth nations.

Why Mongolia? Why Russia other than the above stated? And why Pakistan?

Mongolia has had a hatred of China since the get-go. Genghis Khan spit on the Chinese-Mongolian border back in the 1400's after the Emperor of China suggested the country to the north capitulate. Ever since then, Mongolia's greatest conquest was its southern neighbor, quickly followed by the fall of the largest empire the world has ever seen. Tensions followed throughout History, and spiked again once Mongolia became a Communist country alongside China. However, Mongolia was Soviet Communistic, not Maoist Communistic. The difference, I do not know. All I do know is that the USSR and the PRC hated each other just as much as the ever-famous USA-USSR rivalry.

Mongolia was numerously considered to join the Soviet Union, but it never happened. When the USSR collapsed, Mongolia quickly became a democratic-Capitalistic country.

So why Russia? See above. The lesser-known PRC-USSR rivalry was nearly as intense as the USA-USSR one, and the wounds between these two countries probably haven't healed as well as the Russia-US considering the different government and economic types.

Why Pakistan? The country considers themselves cheated after Britain drew up the final borders for the newly-formed nations in the Indian-Peninsula area. Pakistan is also a predominantly Muslim country, and if you think Americans hate Muslims, you haven't seen Hindu India. Many years ago, the Mughal Empire dominated India with an Iron-Muslim fist. The empire was overthrown, and the Hindus were back in charge.


What could we see come from this war? Probably severely limited Nuclear shelling. The countries in conflict acknowledge the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction, with the exception of potentially North Korea, but pressure from the PRC could prevent it from starting full-scale nuclear combat. If Russia joins the fight against China alongside Western Europe, the Commonwealth, and the US, then China, North Korea, and Pakistan have to look down the barrels of the combined two largest nuclear stockpiles in the world.

Again, the nations in conflict are smart enough to acknowledge MAD, so the use of Nuclear Weapons is extremely slim.

If the situation gets dire enough, we could see the return of the Japanese Armed Forces, but again, extremely unlikely in the extremely unlikely event of there even BEING a World War III.

World War 3 has many unlikely events within itself, and these events are made even more unlikely with the actual war itself. World War III 's chances of happening diminish every day. The world is extremely interdependent, and in the near future, no one nation could fund missions off our planet, the only sure-fire way to preserve and continue the Human species (but we already had that thread).

World War III? If it happens, look at what the nations of China, North Korea, and Pakistan have to fight. The sole superpower on the earth, joined by a collection of the most powerful European nations on Earth, combined with the potentiality of a Northern Front against the largest nation on Earth.

Capitalistic-Democratic-Republics win again!

-Chillz
KineticNinja
offline
KineticNinja
166 posts
Nomad

Uproar is right, if WW3 comes, there is no win. Everybody would just nuke each other and that would be the first and only Global Nuclear War.

terminaato
offline
terminaato
9 posts
Peasant

Why would there even be a WW3? These days there's no need for wars - it's all about economy these days. If one country owns almost all business companies in another country (I won't bring any examples) then it pretty much owns the country itself. If it wants, it can shut down oil or gas supply, make electricity and water cost much more etc.

If it still comes to war though, then I say there won't be winners. Even without nuclear weapons.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

Uproar is right, if WW3 comes, there is no win. Everybody would just nuke each other and that would be the first and only Global Nuclear War.

Naw, no country's stupid enough to launch nukes. They'll threaten all they want, but they're too worried about MAD to push the button. Maybe at the end of a conventional style war (normal bombs, troops, guns, etc) when they know they've lost and aren't worried about MAD because they figure they're dead anyway, they might fire some out of desperation, but that's it.
grimml
offline
grimml
879 posts
Nomad

Naw, no country's stupid enough to launch nukes. They'll threaten all they want, but they're too worried about MAD to push the button. Maybe at the end of a conventional style war (normal bombs, troops, guns, etc) when they know they've lost and aren't worried about MAD because they figure they're dead anyway, they might fire some out of desperation, but that's it.


Don't underestimate the craziness of people like Ahmadinejad.
EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

Don't underestimate the craziness of people like Ahmadinejad.


Apparently he dosen't like nukes either. link
ninjajr
offline
ninjajr
56 posts
Nomad

I say the winner would be America, Russia, or Japan.

KineticNinja
offline
KineticNinja
166 posts
Nomad

Naw, no country's stupid enough to launch nukes. They'll threaten all they want, but they're too worried about MAD to push the button. Maybe at the end of a conventional style war (normal bombs, troops, guns, etc) when they know they've lost and aren't worried about MAD because they figure they're dead anyway, they might fire some out of desperation, but that's it.


Yes, but then every country that's about to die would nuke all of the other countries then they're gone for good.
TheAtheist
offline
TheAtheist
132 posts
Peasant

That depends on who are our allies and enemies. By the way can anyone list the definite allies of the US if we go to war? And the enemies as well?

hojoko
offline
hojoko
508 posts
Peasant

That really depends on who we're fighting. If World War 3 was fought between the United States and China, then our allies would probably include Britain, Russia, India, Japan, and most of the EU. If the was was between the US and any other country (besides Britain), our allies would almost definitely include Britain, but any other country is rather uncertain. Maybe Canada, if they're really feeling it.

PMan24
offline
PMan24
27 posts
Shepherd

I thing the western countries would stay together in any case.

After all, the colonists who founded the USA was Europeans.
And today we fight together in Afghanistan.
I m sure, if there would be a World War 3 (i realy realy dont hope so), we also would fight together. (and probably win )

Showing 196-208 of 213