Obviously I am quite terrified by the prospect of not being able to play violent games anymore as should you.
People who support this law do it for reasons like I suppose it is teaching our kids violent things even though there is no research to back this up. Most people polled said they would give the industry a negative rating.
" These responses seem contrary to findings from the Federal Trade Commission: In November, a report from the FTC stated that "The electronic game industry continues to have the strongest self-regulatory code," and that "compliance with [that] code was high in all media."
Also if the law does pass then the states of Connecticut,Florida,Hawaii,Illinois which is where I live,Louisiana,Maryland,Michigan,Minnesota,Mississippi,Texas, and Virginia will also try to pass similar laws.
People against the law claim that it violates the first amendment.
I would love to know what you think so post some stuff about it.
This is from the article in Game Informer
"We think government efforts should be focused on joining with us to ensure greater understanding and use of our system,because it's the parents-not the government,and not the gaming industry-that should make decisions about what games are suitable for their children"
Once again please place your thoughts below and explain why you think it should be a law or not.
No gamer should be for this law. Therefore, no one on this site would be for this. Honestly, violent video games keep me from going on a murderous rampage. Just wait California, a 12 year old will show up to his/her school with a shotgun and hold everyone hostage.
If they have actual evedince that that games promote violence in kids then I might understand this law a little more but I think video games help kids to express there anger in a non violent way.
Parents, ESRB puts those ratings up for a reason. You have only yourself to blame if you allow your children to play Teen and Mature rated games. I can vouch for you that stores will allow you to look over on the back of the game case to see WHY it is rated as such.
And shame on you as well California. Where's your evidence that suggests that violence and video gaming go hand-in-hand? You don't! I argue that violence and video gaming has no direct correlation whatsoever. If anything, graphs suggest that the two have a NEGATIVE CORRELATION. As children playing violent games goes up, juvenile delinquency goes DOWN.
Yes, those graphs are outdated by a few years. When have we had violent, suggestive games? Since the Atari! Where's the positive correlation? There isn't any!
If you're talking to me, I'm saying that there is no link between children playing violent games and violence itself. So go ahead! Play some DOOM or Scorched Earth or whatever the devil you children play these days....
Seems like that senator missed something... Also seems like Cali will throw the whole ESRB rating system out and put in their own which could lead to different rating systems for every state. I see that resulting in a drop in games sold as some would sell better in some states compared to others based on their rating system. Also apparently the law doesn't affect downloadable games at all leaving that avenue wide open for gaming.
Really though everytime it is brought up it never passes.
If you're talking to me, I'm saying that there is no link between children playing violent games and violence itself. So go ahead! Play some DOOM or Scorched Earth or whatever the devil you children play these days....
scuse me i have some targets to assassinate in hitman blood money...
so? i press a button and shoot someone that's really not much different than watching it
Yur funnee. How is it not different than watching a violent movie? You press the button and fire, killing the person. This amplifies the reality if you have a gun-like controller. When watching the movie, you watch it. When you are playing a video game, you play it, as in you do it. This has nothing to do with violence however, and still has no link to juvenile delinquency.
"We think government efforts should be focused on joining with us to ensure greater understanding and use of our system,because it's the parents-not the government,and not the gaming industry-that should make decisions about what games are suitable for their children"
This is exactly what I always think when people try to make laws that force children away from adult society. If the parents are too lazy to be a parent they shouldn't have kids.
I started playing violent games when I was 6, I don't think it's affected me at all. Maybe that's where my violent attitude came from...
Anyways, back to the matter at hand. I really don't think this is a fair thing to be doing, minors shouldn't be banned from playing violent games as long as the games aren't affecting their thinking in anyway. Like, wanting to shoot somebody with a gun...