ForumsWEPREvil Californians/Austrians try to destroy my freedom.

64 9164
holt24
offline
holt24
1,133 posts
Nomad

Okay dudes Today I opened up Game informer to read some stuff about video games and was shocked to find out that California is trying to ban the sale of violent video games to minors.

Obviously I am quite terrified by the prospect of not being able to play violent games anymore as should you.

People who support this law do it for reasons like I suppose it is teaching our kids violent things even though there is no research to back this up. Most people polled said they would give the industry a negative rating.

" These responses seem contrary to findings from the Federal Trade Commission: In November, a report from the FTC stated that "The electronic game industry continues to have the strongest self-regulatory code," and that "compliance with [that] code was high in all media."


Also if the law does pass then the states of Connecticut,Florida,Hawaii,Illinois which is where I live,Louisiana,Maryland,Michigan,Minnesota,Mississippi,Texas, and Virginia will also try to pass similar laws.

People against the law claim that it violates the first amendment.

I would love to know what you think so post some stuff about it.



This is from the article in Game Informer

"We think government efforts should be focused on joining with us to ensure greater understanding and use of our system,because it's the parents-not the government,and not the gaming industry-that should make decisions about what games are suitable for their children"


Once again please place your thoughts below and explain why you think it should be a law or not.
  • 64 Replies
Avorne
offline
Avorne
3,085 posts
Nomad

No but you can cover your ass if anybody finds out what happened.

Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

Experimental hypothesis - Violent video games increase violent behaviour in children
Null hypothesis - Video games have no effect on violent behaviour in children
Independent variable - Violent video games played
Dependent variable - Violent behaviour in children
Extraneous variables - normal aggression level, distractions, enivronment and attention span
Target population - children aged 7-14
Group size - 500 children within target age group
Random sampling
Field experiment
Quantitive data
Use of confederates? No.



You forgot the use of "observer effect", "blind study", and "CORRELATION".

Where is this "evidence"--citation needed--connect with the opposite correlation that violent video games have on children?
AnaLoGMunKy
offline
AnaLoGMunKy
1,573 posts
Blacksmith

Exactly I think it is entirely up to the parent to decide whether or not a kid should play a game.


I second this motion. Put the responsibility back in the hands of the parents.
holt24
offline
holt24
1,133 posts
Nomad

I second this motion. Put the responsibility back in the hands of the parents.


Yay support.
Showing 61-64 of 64