The accelerated development of shale gas could endanger the stock of greenhouse gases (GHGs), including Quebec boasts everywhere, because the sector of natural gas would be as clean and as harmful for the climate than coal, the worst all fossil fuels known to date
This is indicated by a "reliminary assessment" of GHG emissions in the sector of shale gas, devoted not only to cumulative emissions from the combustion of methane extracted from underground shale, but all the steps very complex and numerous including leaks and fugitive emissions of gas, from exploration to extensive drilling required by this technique.
However that article states that it gives off less GHG, at least according to the Oboma administration, may I ask were you are getting this information?
It sounds to me like the biggest problem is in actually getting them, were methane comes out of the ground, correct? Though it sounds much better for the Americas if we could find a better way to mine it, one were methane does not escape? It sounds like it is something at least putting some research into. More effective means of finding it would also be needed to be researched, after which it would become a far more available gas( We can get it here instead of the Middle East...) as well as better for the environment.
As it is, however, it should only be done in small amounts do to the methane being twenty-five times worse than the burning of conventional fuel.
i think he's a troll cause i see his spam everywhere
You, sir, need to be educated on what a troll does and doesn't do. Just not now. Teacher is busy.
Can I teach plz?
Here, Urban Dictionary explains: Troll; One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument
