bassically in short. some painter decided to paint a political painting of jesus getting a blowjob from another man.
the state acccepted it into the museum and now everybody including children can see it.
im against it completley.
number 1: its pornography and its abuse to show that to a child number 2: its jesus getting a blowjob from a dude number 3: the artist is mental number 4: its jesus getting a blowjob from a dude
its like the whole mosque thing in new york. sure they have the right of the first amendmant, but with that right comes responsibility. its COMPLETLEY immoral.
sure hes trying to talk about like gay marriage and stuff but come on dude really?
ITS JESUS HAVING MO FUKIN JESUS GETTING A BLOWJOB FORM A DUDE AND ITS BEING DISPLAYED FOR EVERYONE TO SEE.
just because you have the right to do something doesnt mean you should. doing that to jesus is in a sense the equivolent of showing and image of Mohamed.
The only thing I have a problem with are children viewing it. A child cannot grasp artist value, I don't feel.
While I agree, I don't see any nudity or pornography anywhere in the panels. None of the depictions are nude, no private parts are showing, and I doubt that children will get that a man leaning between the legs of a female Jesus is intended to show something sexual. The innuendos seem vague at best, especially to the mind of a child who has no previous knowledge to compare the images to. And really, what is the difference in children seeing images of "David" or any other famous works of art that DO portray nudity? That's socially acceptable, but a woman Jesus with a guy between her legs? Nope, that's just taboo. It's hypocritical imho.
The panel with the women on the bed is very hard for me to see. I can't see if they are partially nude or not.
Click on the link that Mage provided, then zoom in on the image. You can see that there is no nudity. It is provocative, however no 'taboo' body parts (breasts, vaginas, penises, etc) are actually depicted.
Yep, some lady ripped it up with a crowbar, and apparently the artist and the museum have decided not to replace the damaged portions, but here's the image of the panels for you all to see.
I hope they are at least pressing charges for vandalism.
They are, as a piece of art it was worth quite some money and they are charging her somewhere in the ballpark of $30,000, however some anonymous person already payed her ($350?) bail....
only 30,000, jail time is needed no peice of art should be destoryed. No doubt her supporters will pay the bail, imagine all those well fair checks being sent to her as we speak.
ben dude seriiously... its offensive to me.... jsut because jesus was a man and you dont see him as anything more does not make it right cause its not. its the equivolent of showing an image of muhhamed.... its not ok dude and seriously im trying seriosly hard right now to not flame the living shit out of you
im actually really tired of the athiests on this site slandering religeon... its not ok people and this is the reason why i NEVER come to the WEPR section because all i ever read about is people flaming my beliefs. so seriously people get your shit together.
ben dude seriiously... its offensive to me.... jsut because jesus was a man and you dont see him as anything more does not make it right cause its not. its the equivolent of showing an image of muhhamed.... its not ok dude and seriously im trying seriosly hard right now to not flame the living **** out of you
im actually really tired of the athiests on this site slandering religeon... its not ok people and this is the reason why i NEVER come to the WEPR section because all i ever read about is people flaming my beliefs. so seriously people get your **** together.
The real problem here is MoFos like you and the lade with the crowbar not being able to tolerate criticism. I don't care if Jesus is sucking off Muhammad with Yahweh and Dawkings making it a chain, you don't have a right to go in there and tear it to shreds. You can be offended if you want, but it won't help your cause. If you are willing for a half-intelligent debate, put something forward rather than "This is offensive to me!". Possibly suggest some alternatives and send a letter to the museum or something, but simply saying "It is offensive to me" does nothing to help your cause...
And just for the record, that couldn't have been Jesus. He is obviously English. Jesus was Jewish.
jsut cause your athiest i dont constantly hate and slander your beliefs dude. i dont make rude remarks toward the fact that you beleieve dont believe in god. i think you need to stop being an insensitive dueche bag then maybe youll be good in a debate dude. cause right now i want to kick some ass cause pricks like you are being hating bitches
And to add, you find that silly little picture more offensive than the fact that a TERRORIST from your own religion attacked it? That is utterly horrible, and if so your a horrible person. I have heard you mention many times about the picture, but not once about the terrorist's actions.
You, sir, and I use that term loosely, are a bigot if that is so.
a terrorist action is bombing a state or city. breaking into a museum and destroying a painting that should never have been painted is justice to my religeon. i know he has the right to do and im on his side when i say that he had all right to do it, but that doesnt me he should have
jsut cause your athiest i dont constantly hate and slander your beliefs dude.
If your beliefs didn't cause hate and pain, which is all to abundant in the actions of the terrorist with a crowbar, I wouldn't have to hate them. Until the day when the religion actually spreads love, I will hate it.
. i dont make rude remarks toward the fact that you beleieve dont believe in god
My unbelief never damaged anyone. The rude comments are deserved, and I will try to stick to the topic and not mention anything negative *Coughlikegayrightscough*
i think you need to stop being an insensitive dueche bag then maybe youll be good in a debate dude.
I am the insensitive dueche? A LADY TOOK A FUCKING CROW BAR TO THIS ART WORK AND YOU HAVE YET TO MENTION IT. Once again, all the hate your religion receives from me is deserved.
cause right now i want to kick some *** cause pricks like you are being hating *****es
I am a hater? For defending free speech? It is just a simple drawing. One simple art work. You are the one who is being a prick about it.
