So. How do you guys feel about population control? Is it ethical? Is it logical? Is it necessary? What kind of population control do you think would work best, if any at all? Can I haz cookie?
In conclusion, the only main things we have to do in order to limit the population, is tighten immigration laws.
You do realize that after 9/11 the laws on immigration to the US became so strict that it is nearly impossible to get to America legally anymore. What the problem is is the illegal immigrants, if you want to look on immigration as the main problem, which really isn't.
In conclusion, the only main things we have to do in order to limit the population, is tighten immigration laws.
That has literally nothing, nothing, to do with limiting the human population. If person A lives in location X or location Y person A still exists as a person, nothing changes.
My answer to that is simple, limitations. America and its immigration laws are pretty vague. You can come to America, take a test, and (if passed) can be a citizen.
Oh, is that why we have so many illegal immigrants? It's a process that can take years.
America and its immigration laws are pretty vague. You can come to America, take a test, and (if passed) can be a citizen. If America were to tighten up those laws, or even completely cut immigration out of America, then that would reduce the population over time.
You do realize we were talking about the planet as a whole, yes? Also as someone who has seen that test, I can tell you this much: It's not a walk in the park, I've had teachers who've told me they wouldn't want to take that test. In addition, American immigration laws aren't all that lax. Also there is a limit on the number of immigrants per year, they don't just let everyone and their grandmother move in.
So the government might say our population is 1,000,000 people, but subtract the illegals, and its maybe around 600,000.
This is going to sound harsh, but I assure you that it is necessary. What you did by posting that statistic is remove all credibility from your argument. How can I trust your judgment on an issue, when you can't even back up your own facts?
Here's a little piece of advice to post by in the WEPR:
Do not cite statistics that you cannot back up with solid facts.
Look at you and your lack of understanding of that term, survival of the fittest means nothing if the species dies it means less that person A is stronger than person B and means more that species A is stronger than species B. Social Darwinism is simply wrong, the human race has survived because of its amazing ability to work together and run.
The negroid race as the least evolved of all human sub-groups
Are you attempting to use eugenics? Seriously? Fine then, back everything you said with scientific evidence and perhaps I can give you a proper rebuttal.
ok if they make a rule that you are not supposed to have more then lets say 3 then oh well BUT if your wife is already pregnant and then you say lets have an abortion because of the goverment screw the goverment
