The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
The Armor Games website will be down for maintenance on Monday 10/7/2024
starting at 10:00 AM Pacific time. We apologize for the inconvenience.
2838 | 803783 |
Welcome all Exit Pathers! This is a designated topic to have all types of convos about Exit Path. One of the purposes of this topic is to keep all conversational-type comments away from the game comments and have them here.
Pass the word around!
Thanks guys
I am 98% sure people said things to FaithPath like people are to Crysis2Rocks now.
You can only say he has hacked if you have proof.
Why do people care so much about a high-score on a flash game anyways?
[/quote]I am 98% sure people said things to FaithPath like people are to Crysis2Rocks now. So, could people calm down with the claims of hacking. You can only say he has hacked if you have proof.[quote]
indeed I got. And guess what, Matrix who is mimicing the "Good Guy" here was the one accusing me to hack back then. He didn't say most likely, he just claimed it wasnt legit. First after getting a 2:37, and kept on claiming for pages! Until a well known player called Ghostofzero vouched for me. And that was even under different circumstances. Where the score, and most of the leaderboard was progressing over time.
Anyways. Its just my opinion, considering the circumstances and how it got scored, that the time is most likely not legit. I cant proofe it, thats why he has the benefit of the doubt and I am not fully calling it a hack. You two can't proofe that his time is legit, so its also just an opinion. PPL are allowed to have opinions in here? Alright lets see what happens. Because Trixie has the tendencie to not accept others opinion and quote there posts into pieces......
He didn't say most likely, he just claimed it wasnt legit. First after getting a 2:37, and kept on claiming for pages!
indeed I got.
Matrix who is mimicing the "Good Guy" here was the one accusing me to hack back then.
He didn't say most likely, he just claimed it wasnt legit. First after getting a 2:37, and kept on claiming for pages! Until a well known player called Ghostofzero vouched for me.
Where the score, and most of the leaderboard was progressing over time.
considering the circumstances and how it got scored, that the time is most likely not legit.
You two can't proofe that his time is legit
PPL are allowed to have opinions in here?
Because Trixie has the tendencie to not accept others opinion and quote there posts into pieces.
Show me proof of this. I vaguely remember the incident, but from what I remember I said you most likely cheated on uniplayer.
Digging up the past for this argument isn't helping you one bit. Sure I called you a hacker back then, but that was when the best score was 2:50. You seriously think people won't question someone getting twenty seconds lower than that on EP1 uniplayer?
And again you need to read it as a whole
here we go quoting until ripping sentences outta context. Is your attention span so short that you cant argue in paragraphs? Or understand someones paragraph in a whole? Sorry but it really looks like that
Explain how any of the things I responded to where taken out of context. I took those things out and quoted sentences because I wanted to address those certain points. Quoting a large paragraph and responding with an even larger paragraph doesn't make much sense, now does it? People would get confused as to what I'm addressing and it wouldn't make sense, hence the quoting of sentences and addressing them. Perhaps you should re-read this discussion over, because obviously you didn't understand what I addressed. And if you like reading things as a whole paragraph rather than having someone address certain points, then open something like notepad and copy/paste all of that into notepad so it's in a single paragraph and read it, since you can only understand things written like that.
Here's some stuff you wrote:
But its like 99% hacked and/or cheated
^ That's not an opinion; you stated it as a fact.
This name never ran into me.
^ From this I gathered that just because you never heard his name it's automatically a hack.
Also imo nobody shoots such a highscore out of the blue.
^ Oh, look, you posted "imo" in there. But wait, people can post highscores like that, so I corrected you right there.
Everybody started getting and submitting 3:00 then 2:40s and so on.
^ Oh, so just because he didn't submit other scores before his 2:25 score it must be a hack.
And what also doesn't fit, his account is not active anywhere, bragging about it, whatever.
Oh, so because he isn't arrogant and gloats about his score it must be a hack.
other thoughts?
But its like 99% hacked and/or cheated :/
I mean there is no proofe, thats why he still claims one percent, but a week before he submitted I was back playing ep1 online occassional. This name never ran into me. Also imo nobody shoots such a highscore out of the blue. Everybody started getting and submitting 3:00 then 2:40s and so on. And what also doesn't fit, his account is not active anywhere, bragging about it, whatever.
Unfortunately the ladder can be hacked with random scores, e.g.:
No its just that I can discuss a topic in its whole
Its easier to dismiss a single phrase and its content, then an idea and thoughts, that get formulated in one or more sentences. The whole idea that merges out of the single phrases.
This for example is ridiculous single phrasing till it looses context:
Guess you didn't re-read the post on page 255. That's understandable considering you're lacking several things. But still if I must explain this again: Separating the points doesn't affect the paragraph. I separated them so they would make more sense, rather than posting a giant paragraph that wouldn't make sense. If you can't comprehend that, then I don't know what to tell you.
But its like 99% hacked and/or cheated :/
I mean there is no proofe, thats why he still claims one percent, but a week before he submitted I was back playing ep1 online occassional. This name never ran into me. Also imo nobody shoots such a highscore out of the blue. Everybody started getting and submitting 3:00 then 2:40s and so on. And what also doesn't fit, his account is not active anywhere, bragging about it, whatever.
The reasons why I said that it is MOST LIKELY not legit has been stated under it
I did not call him that because I know that 2:25 is possible, and because there is no proofe to it yet.
And of course I don't think that everybody close to me is a hack
Anyways. Its just my opinion, considering the circumstances and how it got scored, that the time is most likely not legit. I cant proofe it, thats why he has the benefit of the doubt and I am not fully calling it a hack. You two can't proofe that his time is legit, so its also just an opinion. PPL are allowed to have opinions in here? Alright lets see what happens.
If you can't accept that someone is better than you, too bad; there are better people out there, accept it, quit with the immature thoughts that you are the best at the game and accept that someone is better than you at uniplayer. From your recent posts, it sure does look like you can't accept defeat
Senselessly arguing about it without anything to back up your argument isn't going to get you anywhere, and obviously you're not going to give up the argument because of your inflated ego;
That makes no sense
You just cant handle a discussion of combined thoughts.
But its like 99% hacked and/or cheated :/
I mean there is no proofe, thats why he still claims one percent, but a week before he submitted I was back playing ep1 online occassional. This name never ran into me. Also imo nobody shoots such a highscore out of the blue. Everybody started getting and submitting 3:00 then 2:40s and so on. And what also doesn't fit, his account is not active anywhere, bragging about it, whatever. other thoughts?
-99% or mostly =/= "He's a hacker!"
-Ther is no proofe for hack or not = I am not able to say he did, ur not able to say he didn't; hence i don't claim that he did
-not beeing able to proofe anything = no post on getsatisfaction; i noticed it thank you; you can stop advising it now
-don't think everybody close to me is hack = I can accept good scores, having no problem with them
I don't think I am the best. Never did, never said
-99% or mostly =/= "He's a hacker!"
It's the same as labeling him a hacker. It's like me saying my laptop is 99% good, so it's good, the good outweighs the bad. So you did imply he's a hacker.
People that got to know me closer hopefully experienced that I have no ego issues. I am happy for ppl doing well, and doing better [great time on ep2 darwin, maybe someday i get close ], and I can deal with defeats very well. Check my profile, you will see a statement that still lasts for me: That zero is my #1. I don't think I am the best. Never did, never said.
I don't think I am the best. Never did, never said
From complaining about a score two seconds better than yours it seems like you can't handle someone being better and it leads me to believe you think you're the best at the game. If you didn't want people to think that, then you should've just said nothing and moved on, rather than posting there's a 99% chance he hacked the game and persisted about it.
No its not labeling him that. Its leaving him the chance of beeing legit and stating it.
Like the last post I have said this:
Failing to see others opinions.
I agree with Faithpath. Also, I'd recommend not responding to trix because he loves to quote things and generally write a paragraph for each line of text.
I played for a few hours yesterday, and I think that EP2 has some potential, especially private rooms. I have multiple computers, so I had one account host and not move, and played on my desktop, and it worked out fine. We discovered some new shortcuts, but haven't found a good use for overflow yet that warrants its use.
Gotta love 'dem fanboys and hypocrites.
haven't found a good use for overflow yet that warrants its use.
You must be logged in to post a reply!