Why are they called the winners of the debate if the real winner is the looser?
I have two comments: 1. The winner can also be the looser of the two. 2. On a more serious note, that they are called that says nothing of what should be.
Well then they would just call the looser the winner, wouldn't they?
On a more serious note, that they are called that says nothing of what should be.
Well, they should, because they are called that, and they win the trophies, and the people cheer for them, and they get payed, and they prove that what they stand for is right.
Well then they would just call the looser the winner, wouldn't they?
It was intended to be a joke. A person who is "loose" is promiscuous.
Well, they should, because they are called that, and they win the trophies, and the people cheer for them, and they get payed, and they prove that what they stand for is right.
They don't prove it - their opponent was only unable to disprove them, or if they did, they did so inadequately.
Seriously. Why are they called the winners of the debate if the real winner is the looser? Think about that... Its a paradox. The winner is the person who does the best in the debate, has the most rebutles. etc. Maybe they don't learn the most, but they do win, dont they?
Are you still making the same pathetic argument? Lol. You wouldn't understand so I won't bother explaining it.
Well, they should, because they are called that, and they win the trophies, and the people cheer for them, and they get payed, and they prove that what they stand for is right.
So wait - what happens if I win this argument then? Hmm...?
They don't prove it - their opponent was only unable to disprove them, or if they did, they did so inadequately.
Well, assuming that the debaters both knew can win on the same topic and loose on the other side.
So wait - what happens if I win this argument then? Hmm...?
You dont. Because you just helped me prove what i wanted. If you win the argument, then you're the winner, and i lose. I dont win because i learn more, i loose.
Are you still making the same pathetic argument? Lol. You wouldn't understand so I won't bother explaining it.
Just be quite. You dont know the meaning of the word winner. The looser doesnt win because he learns more, he just learns more. He still looses.
Just be quite. You dont know the meaning of the word winner. The looser doesnt win because he learns more, he just learns more. He still looses.
Implying that someone who doesn't win becomes more loose. And also that I should be "quite". Your statements make no sense. You probably know most about this losing business because it's happened to you the most. It's QUTIE a shame you can't understand the true victory in discussion. Ahh, well. It's a lost cause for you.
