On terms of healthcare I believe he is trying to do the right thing, and taking more from the rich to help not just the poor but also the country's overall economy is worth it. If you don't agree with his plan than it's perfectly okay but you don't have to call him a bad president just because you have different opinions on what a proper way to run the country is.
You don't have to disrespect me and by simply by showing his support is enough to some extent. I never said anything about passing laws... even so, it is his job to pass laws and just because I don't want to state my opinion on a matter of laws that dose not give you the authority to disrespect my rights.
You consider taking some of the money from the rich to give to the poor, greedy? Greedy to who? The people who benefit because they cannot afford to pay for their children's healthcare or education?
Wow, you wouldn't want to pay for your own children? Of course, if you can't afford to pay for them, you shouldn't have had them should you have? Of course, education and health care are inflated due to government systems. We shouldn't rely on the rich to take care of us. We need to take responsibility. We should pay our own debts. We shouldn't force those who are smart enough to make money to give it all away.
But this is a debate on morality.
I assume you're not a fan of Robin Hood, are you?
I believe I'm more of a fan of V.
The rich would never give to the poor without any reason to. Many of rich actually evade taxes.
Rich people donate money all the time! Maybe it's not as much money as you want to take from them, but many rich people do donate their money none the less.
If you OWN something, you should do whatever you want with it. You shouldn't be punished for being "greedy" or "selfish" because you won't give your money away. We should live for ourselves. We should live for each other. We should live for whoever we want.
The rich, being rich, do not harm the market. They are not the reason why prices are high.
Wow, you wouldn't want to pay for your own children?
If I couldn't afford to pay for their education, then I can't let them get the education. If I can afford to pay for twenty children, that aren't mine, to receive an education, then I would pay for it.
Of course, if you can't afford to pay for them, you shouldn't have had them should you have?
It is so sad how you will use any excuse to defend your pathetic argument. It is unfair that one cannot have children because they cannot afford it.
Of course, education and health care are inflated due to government systems.
Okay.
We shouldn't rely on the rich to take care of us.
If it they can afford to, then why not?
We need to take responsibility.
Responsibility. Hm. Responsibility for our own lives? Like I said before, I wouldn't want to be one fish in a pond. I would rather be one fish in a pond with other fish.
We should pay our own debts.
What debts? With my system, people wouldn't have debts.
We shouldn't force those who are smart enough to make money to give it all away.
What if you don't know how to earn money because your parents couldn't afford to pay for your education? It's a cycle, you see. If you're parents didn't pay for your education, then you won't be able to pay for your children's education.
Also, do you have any understanding of how percentages work? 40% is not ALL. 100% is all. I'll say it again, since you didn't understand the first time. If a man makes $1 000 000 annually, he will get to keep $600 000. Is that all? Is that more than enough to live comfortably? Is it necessary to have that amount of money to live? I feel as if I am repeating the same questions over and over again since you do not want to answer them.
Your argument is just that poor people are poor for a reason, and that the rich should not help them.
Rich people donate money all the time! Maybe it's not as much money as you want to take from them, but many rich people do donate their money none the less.
So that they can't get it taxed out of them.
If you OWN something, you should do whatever you want with it. You shouldn't be punished for being "greedy" or "selfish" because you won't give your money away. We should live for ourselves. We should live for each other. We should live for whoever we want.
Yes, you should. But when you own an excessive amount, and when you don't need that amount, and when someone else needs it, you should not get to keep all of it.
Bearsal I was having a conversation with Kevin, but he acted like an idiot so I just stopped commenting, and the part about the immigrants? Well if you ever turned on a TV and watched the news you would see all the people (immigrants) protesting and talking to news reporters.
