ForumsWEPR[req] I dislike threads on religion

38 7174
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

I really dislike all threads on religion. Almost every single thread is someone who doesn't know what he's talking about, raging about how religion is stupid, and someone else overreacting and getting angry and proving the other wrong. The first person then proves the second wrong and then the second proves the first wrong again and it goes on and on but neither will be convinced by each other because of their particular beliefs.

Does anyone else agree with me?

(I'm not an atheist but I'm not saying which religion i belong to)

  • 38 Replies
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

sorry about that

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

You said you couldn't call him a man of science if he didn't apply it to every aspect of his life.
Then you say that scientist by proffesion is okay.
Contradiction much?
I can tell you I don't honestly believe that a jewish carpenter was killed and came back to life 3 days later. But I can honestly tell you, that you being ignorant with your posts.
You constantly cross yourself with new posts, and no I will not go look through our short arguments and give you the proof, whether you realize it or not is up to you.

"I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details."
-Einstein.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
-Einstein.
"The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent and powerful Being."
-Newton.
Galileo, yes was punished for what he thought, but used the Bible in his defense. I don't know what his real preference of religion or non-religion was, but if I meet him I'll be sure to ask.

I've told you before that I am no Christian. I don't believe in a God, I don't really have any theist beliefs. But what I wish for you to see is that you shouldn't be telling these people what they believe in is stupid. Your like the bully on the playground, and you need to stop. They can believe what they want, and if they are looking for a debate, give em hell, but if they aren't leave them alone.

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

E1337, wether or not you believe can find God in science is not the point


If you can find a god with science, then it exists. If you cannot, then it doesn't. If you cannot and claim to be a man of science, you are lying.

I'm not going to explain how its not for the exact reason this thread has started


So the Crusades where just for the hell of it then?

I am here because i am interested on other people's opinions on the matter and i really wish this would stop becoming more religious


That is bound to happen. And I think he means "here" as on the WPRE thread, not this post.

If i believe in the old testament (which i do) i do have a pretty good idea of how that completely differs to my religion today (basically dumb illogical rules created by our current religious leaders who no one questions).


Yeah. A religious leader ordering you to stone everyone who has sex before marriage, curses their parents, doesn't believe, or everything else is far different from a modern religious leader giving you dumb illogical rules...

And also not my religion, just religion in general, with so much hatred towards each other, and using terrorism against another religion just because you don't get what you want (Israel).


I can agree with you there, though I am sure your religion has cause plenty of war. (Since you believe in the OT, you are either Jewish, Christian, or Mormon. Jewish and Christian religions have caused plenty of wars, though I suppose the Mormon religion is not large enough and has not been around long enough for any significant wars.)

may be wrong because i don't remember history too much, when Christianity just started they were able to co exist with the jews just fine, than they decided they knew best for the jews and started forcing them to become Christians because they believed thats the only way to save their soul.


When it started, it was a minority religion. If they got annoying about it and preached on the streets, attempting to overthrow the current religion of say Rome, they got fed to the lions. That tends to keep the number of believers, and thus the number of bigotry, down.

From this point on im not going to answer any more religious questions.


I don't believe you.
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

I really want a moderator to lock this thread!

master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

I don't believe you.


And i don't care.
MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

Before the lock of doom comes,
I would like to apologize, I was slightly blind and didn't realize 314d and E1337 were giving to different posts, so if anything was mistquoted, I do apologize.

And you can believe in the Old Testament, seeing it as a past. You can believe that it happened. Thomas Jefferson, was handed a Bible and he cut the New Testament to shreds. He believed what happened in the Old Testament is real, but men writing the New Testament was foolish and none of it was true.

But my saying I wish some would stop fighting where it isn't welcome sticks to anyone. He asked for opinions on something that didn't have to do with proving or disproving a religion.

314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

You said you couldn't call him a man of science if he didn't apply it to every aspect of his life.
Then you say that scientist by proffesion is okay.
Contradiction much?


A "man of science" and "Scientist by profession" are two different things by my book. I am classifying "A man of science" as someone who is married to science, they apply the scientific method to every part of their life, living as pure avatars of science. A scientist by profession is someone who applies science in the lab only, once they take off the lab coat most of the logical thinking stays behind.

While we are quoting Einstein,

believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.
-- Albert Einstein, following his wife's advice in responding to Rabbi Herbert Goldstein of the International Synagogue in New York, who had sent Einstein a cablegram bluntly demanding "Do you believe in God?" Quoted from and citation notes derived from Victor J Stenger, Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), chapter 3.

The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.
-- Albert Einstein, in a letter responding to philosopher Eric Gutkind, who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt; quoted from James Randerson, "Childish Superstition: Einstein's Letter Makes View of Religion Relatively Clear: Scientist's Reply to Sell for up to £8,000, and Stoke Debate over His Beliefs" The Guardian, (13 May 2008)

For me the Jewish religion like all others is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything "chosen" about them.
-- Albert Einstein, in a letter responding to philosopher Eric Gutkind, who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt; quoted from James Randerson, "Childish Superstition: Einstein's Letter Makes View of Religion Relatively Clear: Scientist's Reply to Sell for up to £8,000, and Stoke Debate over His Beliefs" The Guardian, (13 May 2008)

Make everything as simple as possible but not simpler.
-- Albert Einstein (attributed: source unknown)

[O]nly if every individual strives for truth can humanity attain a happier future; the atavisms in each of us that stand in the way of a friendlier destiny can only thus be rendered ineffective.
-- Albert Einstein, Foreward to Homer W Smith, Man and His Gods

Strange is our situation here on Earth. Each of us comes for a short visit, not knowing why, yet sometimes seeming to divine a purpose. From the standpoint of daily life, however, there is one thing we do know: that man is here for the sake of other men -- above all for those upon whose smiles and well-being our own happiness depends.
-- Albert Einstein, quoted from James A Haught, ed, 2000 Years of Disbelief, p. 241

I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms.
-- Albert Einstein, obituary in New York Times, 19 April 1955, quoted from James A Haught, "Breaking the Last Taboo" (1996)

However we select from nature a complex [of phenomena] using the criterion of simplicity, in no case will its theoretical treatment turn out to be forever appropriate (sufficient).... I do not doubt that the day will come when [general relativity], too, will have to yield to another one, for reasons which at present we do not yet surmise. I believe that this process of deepening theory has no limits.
-- Albert Einstein, acknowledging that all claims to knowledge are de facto subject to revision upon presentation of newer, better evidence, quoted from Victor J Stenger, Physics and Psychics

I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it.
-- Albert Einstein, 1954, from Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press

[Excerpt]
A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.
-- Albert Einstein, "Religion and Science," New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930

[Passage]
It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere.... Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.
-- Albert Einstein, "Religion and Science," New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930

One strength of the Communist system ... is that it has some of the characteristics of a religion and inspires the emotions of a religion.
-- Albert Einstein, Out Of My Later Years (1950), thanks to Laird Wilcox, ed, "The Degeneration of Belief"

It was the experience of mystery -- even if mixed with fear -- that engendered religion.
-- Albert Einstein (attributed: source unknown)

Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural Being.
-- Albert Einstein, 1936, responding to a child who wrote and asked if scientists pray. Source: Albert Einstein: The Human Side, Edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffmann

I cannot conceive of a personal God who would directly influence the actions of individuals, or would directly sit in judgment on creatures of his own creation. I cannot do this in spite of the fact that mechanistic causality has, to a certain extent, been placed in doubt by modern science. [He was speaking of Quantum Mechanics and the breaking down of determinism.] My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. Morality is of the highest importance -- but for us, not for God.
-- Albert Einstein, from Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press

I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature.
-- Albert Einstein, The World as I See It

I am convinced that some political and social activities and practices of the Catholic organizations are detrimental and even dangerous for the community as a whole, here and everywhere. I mention here only the fight against birth control at a time when overpopulation in various countries has become a serious threat to the health of people and a grave obstacle to any attempt to organize peace on this planet.
-- Albert Einstein, letter, 1954

God does not play at dice with the Universe.
-- Albert Einstein, (attributed: source unknown), to which Neils Bohr allegedly responded "Quit telling God what to do!" However, in the Bhagavad Gita, Krsna is quoted as having said: "I am the game of dice. I am the self-centered in the heart of all beings." (See our commentary on this quotation.)

It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
-- Albert Einstein, 1954, from Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press

Laws alone cannot secure freedom of expression; in order that every man present his views without penalty there must be a spirit of tolerance in the entire population.
-- Albert Einstein, Out Of My Later Years (1950), quoted from Laird y, ed, "The Degeneration of Belief"

The more a man is imbued with the ordered regularity of all events the firmer becomes his conviction that there is no room left by the side of this ordered regularity for causes of a different nature. For him neither the rule of human nor the rule of divine will exist as an independent cause of natural events. To be sure, the doctrine of a personal God interfering with the natural events could never be refuted, in the real sense, by science, for this doctrine can always take refuge in those domains in which scientific knowledge has not yet been able to set foot. But I am persuaded that such behaviour on the part of the representatives of religion would not only be unworthy but also fatal. For a doctrine which is able to maintain itself not in clear light but only in the dark, will of necessity lose its effect on mankind, with incalculable harm to human progress....
If it is one of the goals of religions to liberate mankind as far as possible from the bondage of egocentric cravings, desires, and fears, scientific reasoning can aid religion in another sense. Although it is true that it is the goal of science to discover (the) rules which permit the association and foretelling of facts, this is not its only aim. It also seeks to reduce the connections discovered to the smallest possible number of mutually independent conceptual elements. It is in this striving after the rational unification of the manifold that it encounters its greatest successes, even though it is precisely this attempt which causes it to run the greatest risk of falling a prey to illusion. But whoever has undergone the intense experience of successful advances made in this domain, is moved by the profound reverence for the rationality made manifest in existence. By way of the understanding he achieves a far reaching emancipation from the shackles of personal hopes and desires, and thereby attains that humble attitude of mind toward the grandeur of reason, incarnate in existence, and which, in its profoundest depths, is inaccessible to man. This attitude, however, appears to me to be religious in the highest sense of the word. And so it seems to me that science not only purifies the religious impulse of the dross of its anthropomorphism but also contributes to a religious spiritualisation of our understanding of life.
-- Albert Einstein, Science, Philosophy, and Religion, A Symposium, published by the Conference on Science, Philosophy and Religion in Their Relation to the Democratic Way of Life, Inc., New York, 1941

The mystical trend of our time, which shows itself particularly in the rampant growth of the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, is for me no more than a symptom of weakness and confusion. Since our inner experiences consist of reproductions, and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul without a body seem to me to be empty and devoid of meaning.
The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. The religion which based on experience, which refuses dogmatic. If there's any religion that would cope the scientific needs it will be Buddhism....
If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
Immortality? There are two kinds. The first lives in the imagination of the people, and is thus an illusion. There is a relative immortality which may conserve the memory of an individual for some generations. But there is only one true immortality, on a cosmic scale, and that is the immortality of the cosmos itself. There is no other.
-- Albert Einstein, quoted in Madalyn Murray O'Hair, All the Questions You Ever Wanted to Ask American Atheists (1982) vol. ii., p. 29

The minority, the ruling class at present, has the schools and press, usually the Church as well, under its thumb. This enables it to organize and sway the emotions of the masses, and make its tool of them.
-- Albert Einstein, letter to Sigmund Freud (30 July 1932) â â 

[Excerpt]
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
-- Albert Einstein, quoted from the various poster-portraits of Einstein that have graced Cliff Walker's wall for almost two decades, this being Cliff's motto and all-time favorite quip

[Passage]
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.
-- Albert Einstein, quoted in part from the various poster-portraits of Einstein that have graced Cliff Walker's wall for almost two decades

One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike -- and yet it is the most precious thing we have.
-- Albert Einstein, echoing Robert Green Ingersoll ("I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the star-less night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains." from the Field-Ingersoll Debate), quoted from PhysLink.com

"Both deism and traditional Judeo-Christian-Islamic theism must also be contrasted with pantheism, the notion attributed to Baruch Spinoza (d. 1677) that the deity is associated with the order of nature or the universe itself. This also crudely summarizes the Hindu view and that of many indigenous religions around the world. When modern scientists such as Einstein and Stephen Hawking mention 'God' in their writings, this is what they seem to mean: that God is Nature."
-- Victor J Stenger, Has Science Found God? (2001), chapter 3

How is that?

I've told you before that I am no Christian. I don't believe in a God, I don't really have any theist beliefs. But what I wish for you to see is that you shouldn't be telling these people what they believe in is stupid. Your like the bully on the playground, and you need to stop. They can believe what they want, and if they are looking for a debate, give em hell, but if they aren't leave them alone.


This is a debate thread, if anyone goes on here, they are looking for a debate. If they don't respond, then the debate is over and I leave. If they reply, than it becomes a debate.
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

I was slightly blind and didn't realize 314d and E1337


They do have similar names and emblems.

But my saying I wish some would stop fighting where it isn't welcome sticks to anyone. He asked for opinions on something that didn't have to do with proving or disproving a religion.


Thank you, this whole thread has been angering me since it turned to religion and I'm kind of pissed off at my self because i helped move it there.
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

They do have similar names and emblems.


I meant armatars not emblems
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

E1337, and 314d1 can you PLEASE stop arguing here.

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

THIS ISN'T A DEBATE THREAD.
And if it was you would be debating all the wrong things.
This thread was asking a rather dumb question, that you took the time to jump on him for saying one wrong thing. He was asking if anyone thought the same about his belief.
Throughout your post, you stated in different manners, "in my opinion".
He is entitled to an opinion as well, no one can say who is right or wrong with opinions.
I'm sorry for being key to doing the exact thing he doesn't like, which is debating over something stupid.

The first person then proves the second wrong and then the second proves the first wrong again and it goes on and on but neither will be convinced by each other because of their particular beliefs.

This whole time we have been twisting the words in other posts, when no one really looked again at the first post in this thread.
We are constantly trying to disprove one another when I think we both know neither one of us will give in. I don't want you to become some God loving schoolboy or anything, but what I would like is if you realized that not every thread on here is up for religious debate.
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

E1337, and 314d1 can you PLEASE stop arguing here.


If the opposition stops posting, I will also stop posting.

And I will assume that I will wish to apologize, I assume that I started arguing here do to boredom and need for rest. But hey, it is everyone else fault as well for stoking my flames...
MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

EI3, I was mainly pointing that out to 314.
And I never said life back then was perfect. Separation of Church and State wasn't really there.

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

And I will assume that I will wish to apologize, I assume that I started arguing here do to boredom and need for rest. But hey, it is everyone else fault as well for stoking my flames...

Nice way to not really apologize and shove off the blame.

But I do apologize for adding wood to the fire.

314, ever heard of a thing called "letting it go"? You know.. walking away from a fight?
314d1
offline
314d1
3,817 posts
Nomad

THIS ISN'T A DEBATE THREAD.


It is on a debate forum. What does that make it?

And if it was you would be debating all the wrong things.


Than, since I am debating you, than the same is said for you.

He was asking if anyone thought the same about his belief.


It seems more like he wanted to state his own beliefs to me.

Throughout your post, you stated in different manners, "in my opinion".


It is one of those habits, like adding "In theory" or "I think" in front of some of my sentences, which I do some times.

This whole time we have been twisting the words in other posts, when no one really looked again at the first post in this thread.


I think I responded to it to it once.

We are constantly trying to disprove one another when I think we both know neither one of us will give in


Fun, isn't it?

I don't want you to become some God loving schoolboy or anything, but what I would like is if you realized that not every thread on here is up for religious debate.


It is a debate thread, so yes, it is.
Showing 16-30 of 38