Wow, I was so excited that I really messed up that post. I have the gruesome photo, I can post it right now. You guys probably want to see it. By the way, this is a leak. I think it's a Russian leak. Seriously, do I have the go ahead to post it?
While many world leaders applauded the U.S. operation that killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, there were concerns in parts of Europe that the United States was wrong to act as policeman, judge and executioner.
True, but I think this is one of the least examples of this "world police" behavior. For example the Iraq war is a very worst one. The us took the decision without the un permission, if I well remember. Plus, this time it was for helping the world to get rid of the danger of terrorism, and iraq's war was mainly for economic purpose.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder defended the action as lawful Tuesday, but some in Europe said bin Laden should have been captured and put on trial.
That's true as well, but seeing the treatment that the us gave to suspected terrorists in their jails, I'm kind of glad that Osama got killed... we can't even imagine what kind of torture he would probably have been treated with.
Well I'm going to go ahead and post the pic. There have been a couple other pretty gruesome photos on AG like somebody without a cheek so here goes:
It looks pretty fake because he's missing both his eyes (why?), its extremely low quality, and his skin color on is shoulder is different, and his face looks burnt for some reason. That and they would have released an article about it because all i can find now is "white house debating wether or not to release photos".
Well I heard on the news that the photo is supposed to have a "mutilated eye" so I thought it might be it. I believe it is, your choice to believe it or not.
Well I heard on the news that the photo is supposed to have a "mutilated eye" so I thought it might be it. I believe it is, your choice to believe it or not.
It appears the fake picture was initially published by the Middle East online newspaper themedialine.org on 29 April 2009, with a warning from the editor that it was "unable to ascertain whether the photo is genuine or not".