I think there all extremely bad, Stalin killed hundreds of millions, so did hitler and that was considered genocide, and osama commited mass murders and arranged bombins that killed tons more.
I think hitler is the worst cuz he killed a ton of innocent people and started ww (cant remember if 1 or 2)(sorry but I am bad with history)(VERY BAD) and the war killed thousands more so...
Obviously Hitler. Osama wasn't a dime compared to the destruction Hitler caused. Hitler's evils -Tortured thousands -Flattened about 100 towns and cities -His fault Hiroshima is no more -Spent all of Germany's money (Obama...) -Left Germany with a bad rep and no resources -Flattened (almost) an entire religion There's more, but I'm too lazy to get them. Osama's evils -Connections brought illegal trade of weaponry throughout the world -Scapegoat for every terrorist out there
That's about it, his mates did the rest. He was more of a distraction.
Hitler by FAR! I mean really it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out Hitler killed about 52 million people and 6 milion of those people were jews and he was being racists against jews too.
Really, Paarfam? You had to include Obama in there?
OSAMA WAS THE WORST CAUSE HE ATTACKED US AND BROUGHT HIJACKED PLANES TO HIT THE TWIN TOWERS AND THE PENTAGON ON 9-11 AND HE KILLED alot of people. GOD BLESS JENJEN3451
I really hope you're trolling there, jenjen. :/
And if you guys are calculating their evils by the amount of people they killed, then Stalin is the worst. Honestly, I think both Hitler and Stalin are pretty equal, since they both had...different...kinds...of evil?
I'm not too sure on who Stalin is honestly. I just know Hitler was way worse than Osama.
Stalin was the dictator of the Soviet Union. Millions and millions of his people starved to death, and he killed a bunch of higher-ups if they didn't agree with him,. However, without him, the allies probably wouldn't have won against Nazi Germany, and his country sacrificed the most amount of soldiers in WWII.
Thanks for the tip. Well, taking a Hitler V. Stalin standpoint for a moment, Hitler took over nearly all of Europe, where as Stalin had control of many of the portions that Hitler didn't have. It's a close call, but I'd have to say that Hitler was worse. Not people-killed-wise but money-wise, Hitler's impact caused Europe to go into a short-lived but devastating recension. Not only that, but after WWI Germany was already bankrupt so he made is that much worse.
actually in paarfam in his early years hitler was very good for germany, he solved many of their economic issues, but yes of course in the long term he bankrupted them again
