About that grand scheme of yours, what else is it besides getting everyone stirred up and raging against you?
Is that what you're attempting to incite? Quite frankly those with intelligence and the fortitude to actually debate with us are the ones we want to be dealing with, not the ones who will take insult to us for having viable opinions.
You and Highfire didn't have a plan. You just saw that everyone else was arguing against him, and decided to join in.
... Because... He agreed maybe?
You obviously read the part about starting a seperate thread. It just didn't help your argument.
What is that supposed to mean? We stick with this thread because we're not meant to make others about CoD - end of story, am I right or are you trying to make something out of this?
I tried to be neutral
If you did, then you did it supremely poorly. You didn't take in the points that we have and you actually haven't seen the effects that our opinions have had - people may be getting stirred up surely but they're not raging at us throwing horrendous insults.
For the most part, anyway.
If you wanna take a stab at that then take a stab at religion for doing the same - it is essentially a FACT that it has done good and bad. Why don't you do what you've done thus far and be a catalyst?
Also, this is a private forum. No freedom of speech here.
That's the worst lie I've heard ever. Be quiet... seriously.
You can't post porn, you can't post Hitler propanganda, you can't say **** or ****,
Oh, so now you use the rules to your advantage? Fail. You must have intentionally misconstrued what he said in the hopes of gaining a point. This does NOT make it a private forum it just makes it a forum with some restrictions - we have broken neither of them.
and you can't go into a thread that wasn't an argument and start one for the sake of getting others to rage
Which we're not - again, you misunderstand the point.
I can nitpick too.
Your form of nitpicking is putting words into our mouths or trying to twist it in some other way. The one time he doesn't make his sentence as clear as day you try and bend it to your side of the argument - and you wonder why we write a lot?
Because THAT'S one of the reasons, little immature fools like you trying to make everything go against us is simply insulting, quit being so antagonizing in terms of insults or the fact that persisting that you're right when we have shown otherwise and leave - or do it on my profile, I've got all the time in the world to prove why you should shut up.
Saying your a hero, is blantently bias and again add to hypocrisy of your arguments
ChillzMaster is the satanic sidekick - he was saying I'm the benevolent hero.
That, and bias? How can we not be? The fact that no one has come up with a solid argument for our disliking of CoD could only really reinforce our belief that the game is bad. We haven't been disproven - and you've not been helping now have you?
Oh, and please, don't call me out on calling you a ****** with a "yo momma joke".
Because we haven't been using logic and reason. Although if you do suspect as much then I might as well comment on how poorly you must've been raised to be so aggressive.
The sad thing is? I may be right - it isn't without reason, granted, not a sufficient amount but still it has a spark of reason.
Oh, the irony.
Nitpicking at my words. You focus on the fact that I said hate, not my argument that you should simply start another thread on it.
You're nitpicking at what we said
If it's a Call of Duty based argument, it belongs here.
Fail?
Anyway, I don't feel like wasting anymore of your precious time by reading this. I just won't argue, you won't get your fix of rage, and you'll move on. Bye!
Again, such a poor argument.
I like how you've done better in stirring people up and making an attempt of having them rage than us - another count of hypocricy, 'eh?
Can someone ban or warn this guy?
Ban or warn me too if you think I'm wrong, but as I've said - I have a valid point, and until it's disproven this debate is going nowhere in Aax5's favor.
And if you want to be nitpicky fine - the lines below "
Can someone ban or warn this guy?" are so I don't look like a complete idiot infront of the third party observers who I can only imagine are the ones who will get something out of this.
Realistically I think I've done nothing wrong whilst you're just a terrible person at debate.
And a terrible person as a whole - from what I can tell.
Just pointing it out there.
Went 56 and 6 on Favela, just running around the alleys and on the roof tops in a big circle. You move too fast to be tracked, and the silencer means you never show up.
Would you say that it's mostly just good for Favela? I don't think maps like Wasteland would be good though - Rundown could work with it.
It's pretty darn close range, so it needs to be a map that you can rely on close-quarter combat to do effectively with it in.
- H
