ForumsWEPRNaughty Naughty Criminals Sell Scrumptious Lemonade

61 11100
NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

After news spread of children having their lemonade stands shut down, these men and women decided to protest to prove that it's a crime to sell lemonade for 10 cents a cup.

If you want to become a street side vendor, you must first get a permit which costs money and are often in limited supply. The reason behind this is because businesses are corrupt and must be limited by the government and permits help protect consumers and don't harm innocent people in any way what-so-ever. At least... that's what you're going to hear from advocates who support vending licenses.

But let's suppose we allow people to sell food from vending carts and stands on the side of the street. What could we expect to see? For one, children wont be shut down by police officers.

  • 61 Replies
Blkasp
offline
Blkasp
1,304 posts
Nomad

First thing that comes to my mind when I saw that video: ROFL.

I seriously don't understand what they are trying to achieve by this law? Could somebody please explain it?

My suggestion would be to change it so that its only not allowed to set up on a main street without a permit.

Kasic
offline
Kasic
5,552 posts
Jester

The one and only thing that perfectly illustrates just how I feel about this is...

*Facepalm*

Really? People have been selling things on the street for thousands of years, how many times have you heard of a local 10 year old poisoning his lemonade? For that matter, how often have you heard of -anything- being sold street side that was dangerous (Other than drugs anyways...)

Armed_Blade
offline
Armed_Blade
1,482 posts
Shepherd

This law is a load of crap. If you see a street side vendor and you aren't willing to trust that the lemonade/whatever isn't poisoned/has a bomb in it, then you won't buy it. The idea of getting a permit is stupid and pointlessly steals people's money. It sounds depressing to think we're outlawing lemonade stands.

MoonFairy
offline
MoonFairy
3,386 posts
Shepherd

Well you have to take in mind that when the idio- I mean government made this law, there has probably been a problem in the past of some type of poison in lemonade sold on the street. It doesn't have to be on purpose, you can still get sued for negligence.

But still, it's a waste of time. Does the government really not have anything better to do than arrest people selling lemonade?

"OH MY GOSH THAT LEMONADE KEG LOOKS LIKE IT HAS A POISON IN IT, ARREST THEM ALL! That's what terrorists get when they try to disguise themselves as regular citizens, acting all harmless. They think they can fool us! Ha!"

T____T

KineticNinja
offline
KineticNinja
166 posts
Nomad

Wow, I never knew you needed a license to sell lemonade on the street. Cops sure don't care at all then lol

dair5
offline
dair5
3,371 posts
Shepherd

There was probably a problem with people selling things that were harmful. But it seems like the police could be doing something much more important.

It seems crazy that police are taking the time to shut down and arrest people selling lemonade. There has to be something else for them to do.

NoNameC68
offline
NoNameC68
5,043 posts
Shepherd

This kind of permit is nothing new. There's something very similar to it called the medallion system in which the number of taxis are limited and must have medallions.

Where I live, you need a vending license. Guess what, they aren't giving any away. If you want one, you have to pay big bucks.

My options are limited. I can either go to a fast food restaurant, or I can go to a regular restaurant. It would be so much easier if I could just stop and pick up a hot dog or gyro from a street vendor. There would be much more variety!

America is not a free country. Corporations have taken over by bribing our politicians to pass stupid licensing laws.

MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

I would think it's would be pretty clear even with a vending permit law that the law was not intended to be used in such a way. I can only assume the cops who shut them down were either idiots or they got a complaint from some suffering from an cranial lodgement within there **** cavity.

Blkasp
offline
Blkasp
1,304 posts
Nomad

Or they are required to do this. If they see someone breaching any law, they are required to stop them.

xAyjAy
offline
xAyjAy
4,710 posts
Blacksmith

thats because the big buisness men controll the market and if someone sells food or something else they (the buisness men) fear that they get not so much money. so, if a land is controlled by buisness men there laws like that one with the lemonade. the corrupted police arrest them then if they have not an expensive permit. so, if you get arrested or have this permit, the big buisness men get money.

partydevil
offline
partydevil
5,129 posts
Jester

no wonder so many people go to jail in the usa if you even arrest people that sell lemonade xD

notinthepie3
offline
notinthepie3
655 posts
Nomad

"Breaking the LAW???" That friggin' law sucks, lady. "Free country" definitely doesn't describe what's going on. I think the police should spend their time busting drug dealers, not children from lemonade stands. Really??? Not only will this incident probably change the kids' point of view on police, but make the police look bad and idiotic. It's a lose-lose. The police were doing their job, yeah, but was their job doing what it should be?

Sure, there could have been a possibility of poison, but I think that the police should spend their time doing better things.

EmperorPalpatine
offline
EmperorPalpatine
9,439 posts
Jester

but make the police look bad and idiotic.

It could be said that during prohibition cops looked stupid for restricting alcohol from the public. That made people upset too, but it was the law.
Moe
offline
Moe
1,714 posts
Blacksmith

It could be said that during prohibition cops looked stupid for restricting alcohol from the public. That made people upset too, but it was the law.


There were as many cops in speakeasies as there were non-cops.
dair5
offline
dair5
3,371 posts
Shepherd

It's terrible that big companies got the government to make this law. It's really obvious too that it's companies and not the government. Because if it was the government then there wouldn't be a monthly fee. The most the government should have done was a small one time fee. But the big companies are afraid that the bussniess will grow and that others will want to join them.

Showing 1-15 of 61