as now things r going like Indian war excercises on our eastern borders and some american officials saying that they will attack in pakistan if they have to (like in jacobabad) do you think there will be a war on pakistan by India and america or both and what will b china & israel's position on it
that is not a part of war, that what I would call terrorisme.
If a civilian shoots at soldiers, they're taking an active stance instead of a neutral one. They lose their rights as innocent civilians for doing that.
If a civilian shoots at soldiers, they're taking an active stance instead of a neutral one. They lose their rights as innocent civilians for doing that.
dunno if the topic was going about usa attacking pakistand or the other way around. but by the name of the topic itself and the 1st post from the OP. it looks like usa starts attacking pakistan. your reason is only right if they attacked 1st. ow and btw civilians are not the army if the civilian turns out to be a terrorist or was just confused when he shot 1st. then your not in war whit the country yet.
ow and btw civilians are not the army if the civilian turns out to be a terrorist or was just confused when he shot 1st. then your not in war whit the country yet.
Of course not. I was talking about during wartime. If you fire on enemy soldiers instead of staying out of the way, you can expect bullets back.
Of course not. I was talking about during wartime. If you fire on enemy soldiers instead of staying out of the way, you can expect bullets back.
Obviously, but the issue is nobody knows who the militant civilians are and who aren't. Due to that, wartime attacks on civilians are always messy.
Also, about the Osama thing -- Chances are there was some corruption going on in the government, there always is. I mean, bear in mind that America regularly pumps billions there yearly to control minds and whatnot. On top of that, we expect for these government mercenaries to be loyal to us, but why should they when they can play the game both ways?
I don't think it is 'Their Army sucks so they couldn't find Osama' It's more like 'Some guy in the Army was making bank/hated America so he pulled strings'. Most of Pakistan's army doesn't even devote itself to domestic issues like militant political groups and the northwestern areas with Taliban influence, they are more concerned with regional issues like defending the border with India and all of that fear/hostility.
Many already moved. That's why there's drone strikes in Pakistan. If we end up fighting the Pak army too, it means we don't need to be friendly and tactful with bombing raids (avoiding civilian casualties and such).
Dude drone strikes are only happening in a place called FATA(Federaly Administered Tribal Areas) and they sanctioned by our gov (and i hate them for this). BTW drones can b shot down easily.
Dude drone strikes are only happening in a place called FATA(Federaly Administered Tribal Areas)
Because there's not an actual war between countries being fought in Pakistan. When there is, be expecting bombs dropped on your cities. We did it to Japan in WWII.
Also, about the Osama thing -- Chances are there was some corruption going on in the government, there always is
That's what I've been saying almost this whole time.
and still the usa is the only country that droped a nuke on innocent people.
I think what leaders in Africa are doing to their citizens is a lot worse. Considering we also went to help re-build soon after.
good job freedom fighters
I don't why we try to help put nuclear defences in European countries if this is what we get in return. We were at war with another country, citizens of Japan said it couldn't have been helped when in all-out-war. The war being fought in the Middle East isn't against the actual countries there, it's against the terrorist groups there. The bomb dropped on Japan also happened about 70 years ago.
I don't know where you found pride in any of that, care to explain where I showed such pride?
i think not. it's not good what some of them are doing but i can't say i find it worse.
Considering the total of deaths for both bombings was less than 500,000 and what's going on in some parts of Africa comes to a total of probably around 1 million? Do the math there.
Says who? Anything could happen in 2 months. In politics and military, 2 months is a long time. There could be a change in regime, tensions could finally snap, ect. Please present proof that all this will be over by the holiday season.
