as now things r going like Indian war excercises on our eastern borders and some american officials saying that they will attack in pakistan if they have to (like in jacobabad) do you think there will be a war on pakistan by India and america or both and what will b china & israel's position on it
Look at the past conflicts the U.S. and U.K. have fought in and they are full of heroic deeds
you also had war in congo. wich you only made a worse country. (and it's not the only 1 and only time)
the heroic deeds have gone to your head since ww2. evry time you see a oppertunity to attack people you will do it. just so you can shout out that you are the hero. well the hero is a *******, narrow minded arrogant people.
to name just a few of thousands
if you call evry mission a heroic deed then your right. thousands. if we count the real heroic deeds it's closer to 6 or 7 in the last 70 year. (out of 26 wars ) and about 10 if we count those in ww2 itself.
and befor your going to ask come whit that proof. then i will refuse because i don't gonna post it evry time a new american idiot is shouting for his army.
@ rickers u r high or something get your facts straight man! u saying that we fought against GB in ww2is an insult for me my great father gave his life at berma u talk about veitnam USA lost 54000 troops there an finally gave up and VC lost 200000 men woman and children but eventually managed to kick americans out of nam u talk about bangladesh that was not a country VS country war it was more like american revolutionary war BANGALIS WANTED TO GET SEPARATED FROM PAKISTAN BUT DUE TO BAD GOVERNMENT POLICIES THINGS GOT VOILENT AND THEN INDIA INTERFERED WITH FOUR TIMES ARMY THAN PAKISTAN AND AS FOR MAJOR CONFLICTS TELL ME WHO PUSHED USSR BACK FROM AFGHANISTAN I KNOW WHAT YOU WILL SAY U WILL SAY "AMERICA SUPPLIED U WITH WEAPONS" YEAH IT DID BUT AFTER WE STARTED WAR WITH STENS AND ENFIELDS U KNOW WHAT INITIAL AID PACK WAS WORTH? IT WAS WORTH ONLY 10 M DOLLARS 10 M DOLLARS TO DEFEAT USSR AFGHANS AND PAKISTANIS FOUGHT THAT WAR PRIMARILY AND USA ONLY HELPED TO CONTAIN COMMUNISM WHEN USSR WAS NO LONGER USSR THEY TURNED THEIR BACK ON AFGHANS AND THEN TALIBAN CAME IN TO BEING. PS:- TALKING TO AN IGNORANT CONTEMPTUAL IDIOT LIKE U SEEMS A WASTE OF TIME TO ME
Empty vessels make the most noise. The Taliban supplied by the U.S. fought the Russians and they didn't win. The U.S.S.R. was forced to withdraw due to political strife in the lead up to its dissolution, not the Afghans' fighting. The Azad Hind "government" fought for the Japanese and controlled the areas which later became Pakistan and Bangladesh. Oh, those Stens and Enfields you're so proud of they were donated by the British. @partydevil You obviously have no idea what it's like in war. You sit at home typing and spouting nonsense, with the closest you've come to fighting a war playing COD. Every soldier who fought for his country is a hero and if you don't agree with that saying you need to do more, look back at history and you'll see you are well off the mark. The British fought against overwhelming odds in North Africa yet came out on top. The liberation of Europe took incredible courage as did the intervention in Korea. Vietnam was a horrible war which the veterans still don't get credit for. The Falklands war was close quarter combat at night. You call that unheroic but you'd pap your pants. You say these been six or 7 in 70 years, but every day we hear of soldiers who gave up their lives in Afghanistan for their soldiers. The soldier who jumped on a grenade; isn't he a hero? I'm British and I respect any soldier who gives everything for their fellow people. We never controlled or fought in the Congo; that was the French. We fought in South Africa at a place called Rorke's drift. You may have heard of it. P.S. Contemptual isn't a word. You mean contemptuous but you still got it wrong as that means I treat you with contempt. Try harder ext time; you wont look as stupid.
And Orion. Admit that you only wont provide evidence because you've got none. People respect you if you're honest. punisher, I think the word you were looking for was contemptible.
i can assure u pakistan will b the stalingrad for any nation who attacks on it
If they can shoot down our planes that fly above the clouds and are made of material that radars can't pick up, then you'll be right. Only reason the war on terror in the middle east is going so slow is because you don't know who's who until they shoot the first bullet. But we'll be able to pick out uniformed troops over civilians. Needless to say, a war on Pakistan would probably last maybe about a year, with the capital being a pile of rubble.
I never heard of a plane made of a material, that a radars cant pick up. What material is it?
And when did a soldier jump on a grenade in afghanistan? can you give some sort of a evidence? you want evidence from others, so it only fair you giv it yourselv to
Every soldier who fought for his country is a hero
nazi german soldiers are heroes?
closest you've come to fighting a war playing COD
the closest that i was to war is a train hostage were 8 people were killed. (i was part of the military groupe and 2 of my team died there) (and COD is a sissy's game. to slow shooter for me)
Vietnam was a horrible war which the veterans still don't get credit for.
because they don't deserve it like most soldiers.
You call that unheroic but you'd pap your pants.
because you kill people does not mean your a hero. and no i will not. ive been in gunfights befor. i know very well how to handle presure and stress.
he soldier who jumped on a grenade; isn't he a hero?
no it's a idiot.
We never controlled or fought in the Congo; that was the French.
i was talking about the last 70 year so that whold automaticly be the usa. i thought your from there because youve got them so high up your ars.
if we r losing in conventional warfare we'll use nukes
Didn't the Geneva Convention ban the use of those? And if you launch them at the U.S., it'll get shot down before it reaches the middle of the Atlantic.
Pakistan is stronger than afghanistan and your forces could not afghanistan do you think they can conqure pakistan
I told you this in another thread, the U.S. isn't fighting Afghanistan, we're fighting the terrorist groups in Afghanistan, get your facts straight.
Remember, this is the most powerful army in the world you're underestimating, here.
unlike u americans we cosider it an honor to give our life for our country
And unlike you Pakistanians, we care if we die because we care about our families feelings, giving us an adrenaline rush to fight on, while if you guys get shot, you just roll over an die. You guys have the better fighting spirit, but we have the better mentality 9not calling anyone stupid).
Our army has set many world records we have the record of fighting on worlds highest battle field highest artillery position
U.S. holds the record for farthest head shot (about a mile and a half) and artillery isn't always consistent with accuracy.
if any one takes such an army light than all i can say is that he is/she is stupid
Like what you've been doing with the U.S. this entire time? I know you're patriotic, but this is the United States of America military we're talking about here.
no it's a idiot
To protect those he cared about? That's like saying taking a bullet for those you love isn't heroic, learn the definition of heroism, and don't just give me a textbook definition.
Apologies for triple post but that should have been directed at partydevil.
you mean that
Contemptual isn't a word. You mean contemptuous but you still got it wrong as that means I treat you with contempt.
and
I think the word you were looking for was contemptible
then 1st of it wasn't me saying that word. 2nd what do i care about perfect english spelling? it's the i-net and i-net is not only around for english speaking people. aslong you understand what i mean it's good enoufg.
do you know the blast radius from a granade? by the time he jumped on the granade evry1 could have jumped away by 1 shout called: GRENADE!!! (point finger and jump away)
I do know that the radius for an M67 grenade (American grenade, not sure if the terrorist groups have gotten hold of those specific grenades) is about 15 meters (kill/casualty radius). By the time it took the grenade to get to the target, you probably only had a second or less to get away from it, try running 15 meters in a second or less. And it's not like they just stood there and watched the insurgent throw the grenade and watched in awe as it hurdled through the air at them, it was more than likely either rolled to them from the ground or it was thrown during a fire fight, meaning the squad was probably too busy shooting at other people to notice one sneaky little devil throw the grenade at them.
it's the i-net and i-net is not only around for english speaking people
Problem with that statement: the rules in AG specifically ask for English only, meaning the interacting part of the site is only around for English speaking people.
i speak english and ive always did on AG. the rules do not say that you must be able write english 100% perfectly befor your allowed on the forum.
and you understand what i'm saying els you whold not reply to my comments =)
I do know that the radius for an M67 grenade (American grenade, not sure if the terrorist groups have gotten hold of those specific grenades) is about 15 meters (kill/casualty radius). By the time it took the grenade to get to the target, you probably only had a second or less to get away from it, try running 15 meters in a second or less. And it's not like they just stood there and watched the insurgent throw the grenade and watched in awe as it hurdled through the air at them, it was more than likely either rolled to them from the ground or it was thrown during a fire fight, meaning the squad was probably too busy shooting at other people to notice one sneaky little devil throw the grenade at them.
whatever you want. for me he is still a idiot. and i will never consider him a hero.
