So you basically wished a homosexual child on me as a form punishment? Wow, I suppose that's another form of child abuse that you have fashioned. Its like wishing a crippled child on me and having to "DEAL WITH IT". Kind of sick...
kind of sick that you think that homosexuality is about the same a being crippled.
I totally agree with you. I don't think sexual acts should be public. It should stay private. Like I mentioned before. No one really cares about sexual origination so long as it stays private. But there are a lot of perverse homosexuals out there, the "flamming" type, that ruin it for themselves and everyone else.
Using this logic, we should outlaw heterosexuality.
Its not normal and I will not suffocate myself in the delusion that it is. And you are mistaken. People DO wake up and say, "I am gay". They usually decide this later in their lives.
If homosexuality isn't natural, then nor is heterosexuality. One's sexual orientation is determined, in part, by their genetic code.
Its decided in their life, usually years later that they "find out" that they are gay.
Kinda like how those 10-11 year old boys and girls "find out" that they like other girls and boys? You don't start feeling a sexual attraction until puberty usually.
Tell me, if it's a choice, when did you decide that you were going to be heterosexual?
Also, way to just completely ignore everyone's comments on how just because something may not be natural does not mean that it's wrong.
May I also point out that homosexuality harms you in no possible fashion whatsoever in any way?
So you basically wished a homosexual child on me as a form punishment? Wow, I suppose that's another form of child abuse that you have fashioned. Its like wishing a crippled child on me and having to "DEAL WITH IT". Kind of sick...
kind of sick that you think that homosexuality is about the same a being crippled.
Zakyman, I'm done talking to you after you decide that I am the reason for genocide. I never suggested it once. And you go off raging on a topic that was civil. It seems in fact that you are the one that would have me off because I my belief. You sir, have really shown that you are not someone of merit. Calm down, deep breathes man. Debate your point without going crazy and debating your ideas civilly.
lol, NoName your first post was decent. It was worth the read. But then your second post you lost composer. Don't do well to beliefs that are not your own?
"Therefore, this argument is invalid."
Breaking out the illegitimacy of argument to debate your point? That works huh.
If homosexuality isn't natural, then nor is heterosexuality. One's sexual orientation is determined, in part, by their genetic code.
I'm done with you too. Actually, heterosexuality is natural. And you argue the point that its in the genes when clear it has not been proven. So you are using false statements to justify yourself now?
Partydevil, You missed the point. Re-read and come back to me.
Yes, it is. So is homosexuality, it is just not as common. It's obviously natural, as it occurs in other animals as well as us. Even if you want to argue that it's not natural, so what? It harms no one, you don't have to be apart of it, so there is no reason for it to not be allowed.
So you are using false statements to justify yourself now?
And you're using your own unfounded personal beliefs to attempt to argue against the happiness of other people simply because you don't like it. I don't like peas, I don't think they should be outlawed because of it.
Also, you're a bigot, a disgusting bigot - why is it that most bigots are from the southern part of the USA and talk with a cowboy accent and bash their bibles to buggery?
To stay on topic, why does your opinion matter when it comes to gay marriage? Should all things that certain people find "disgusting" be banned? For example, many people on this forum find your attitude about homosexuals disgusting, so you should be banned from commenting, right?
Kasic, you totally disagree with me. And you weren't flaming the crap out of me. You are the most professional.
Sexual attraction does start at puberty. That is what I meant by "later." No one comes out of the womb gay or straight. Yes, so they decide their orientation later.
I do decide to be heterosexual. I suppose you will argue then that its their choice. Yeah, it is their choice. That's the point. It's people's choices to their sexual orientation.
Kasic, your post actually got me thinking. I say it is unnatural because it goes against nature. There are no creatures, whose orientation is homosexual, except mans. No one can argue that it is in the genes because there is no actual evidence to support it. Things that are nature and things that are unnatural can be wrong. And I feel that this one unnatural issue is wrong.
Homosexuality doesn't harm me or anyone else, you are right. I just believe that regarding the DOMA, that marriage should be between a man and a woman.
I am done here for a while since AG.com conveniently is having some server issues or something. I can talk later with those who offer a debate of substance and not just thoughtless flames and rants.
To stay on topic, why does your opinion matter when it comes to gay marriage? Should all things that certain people find "disgusting" be banned? For example, many people on this forum find your attitude about homosexuals disgusting, so you should be banned from commenting, right?
DOUBLE TRUE
Homosexuality is disgusting to me.
I find you to be disgusting but I can't take away your rights now can I?
I said, regarding DOMA, marriage should remain between a man and a woman. I said, I believe homosexuality is wrong. Everyone is putting words in my mouth that I clearly have not stated. Are jumping to conclusions that are extreme for which I have never stated.
To stay on topic, why does your opinion matter when it comes to gay marriage? Should all things that certain people find "disgusting" be banned? For example, many people on this forum find your attitude about homosexuals disgusting, so you should be banned from commenting, right?
My opinion is as much valid as anyone here. It seems the Mods here like to use their logic to invalidate people. AND THUS THEREFORE HENCE they are proving their points by dismissing spelling or sentence errors or using big words like fallacy.
Never once did I say homosexuality should be banned. No, you can't ban people for what they think or who they are. I don't know if that was just a question, or a response to something I didn't say.
Again, what is with this ban you bring up? Did I once ever tell someone here they should be banned because of what they think?
Its an open Forum, and yes it has rules to follow, but I'm not flaming other people like they are me for their difference. Am I going around flaming people? NO. I am not, but they are. And I believe there is a rule against that.I am clearing stating an opinion of mine regardless of people's agreement with me.
Of course we can argue all day all the points. At the end, no one is going to change their minds. People are only getting upset. I'm not upset here with anyone who thinks different. Sure, I'll debate it with them and we can throw facts, links, color graphs at each other all day. But I'm not calling anyone here stupid
Of course it is, but I don't understand why it should dictate whether or not homosexuals can be married.
Never once did I say homosexuality should be banned. No, you can't ban people for what they think or who they are.
I never said you that you thought homosexuality should be banned, that would be nearly impossible. I was referring to gay marriage, which you certainly believe should be prevented (you obviously don't like my choice of the word 'ban' even though that's essentially what DOMA does).
Again, what is with this ban you bring up? Did I once ever tell someone here they should be banned because of what they think?
That wasn't my point, my point was that if gay marriage should be banned because the majority disapproves, then certainly users of whose views the majority of users disapprove should be prevented from posting on the forum. The situation was purely hypothetical.
southern part of the USA and talk with a cowboy accent and bash their bibles to buggery
Tsk, tsk, tsk.... Rule breaker. Did I mention hipocritical bigot?
Did I SAY I was a Christian? Notice: Males and females of two species have reproductive organs that are specialised not to work without each-other. NO animal can reproduce with the opposite sex interacting to assist/complete the process. These are biologically and naturally occuring processes that are constant, and stable. Therefore, SCREW (pardon the pun) Homosexuality. The fact that you humans, as one of the most advanced and civilized races known, even need to decide this is rather pathetic. I believe in the rights of the individual, but not to the extent that he/she can abuse his/her "sychological" excuses for being a menace to society.
NO animal can reproduce with the opposite sex interacting to assist/complete the process.
A myriad of organisms can.
And towards the rest of your paragraph, you're logic is completely flawed based off an terrible assumption, humans want and need to reproduce. Of course we do until a certain point, but at 7 billion people that point is long past.