ForumsWEPR"Under God" in the Pledge?

23 6625
stephenking
offline
stephenking
2,413 posts
Nomad

Yes, I'm talking about a pretty key item of controversy. Now, don't say that it is right because "God is an ever loving..." (I'm not hating on Christians) So, anyway, if you're Atheist, what are your views on it? Do you still say "Under God" in the Pledge?

  • 23 Replies
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

Before it get's brought up for the umpteenth time the original pledge did not include "Under God" this was an addition made in the 50s.

I personally think the government needs to remain secular in order to be all inclusive of the individual beliefs of the people. Acknowledging a God does not do this and as such I don't think it belongs.

Some argue that the word God is being used in a general sense. However God in it's capitalized form is almost synonymous with the Abrahamic God specifically, which is how it's written in the pledge. So in this form it is favoring one religion over another.

stephenking
offline
stephenking
2,413 posts
Nomad

Before it get's brought up for the umpteenth time the original pledge did not include "Under God" this was an addition made in the 50s.
Thanks for mentioning that, though I would've.

Some argue that the word God is being used in a general sense. However God in it's capitalized form is almost synonymous with the Abrahamic God specifically, which is how it's written in the pledge. So in this form it is favoring one religion over another.
Right, I mean, I know it's freedom of religon, but they're just trying to force Christianity on every single person.
Deth666
offline
Deth666
653 posts
Nomad

Some argue that the word God is being used in a general sense. However God in it's capitalized form is almost synonymous with the Abrahamic God specifically, which is how it's written in the pledge. So in this form it is favoring one religion over another.


That may have been how it was meant when it was written but I've always viewed it in the general sense. I mean to say that everything is subject to a person's individual interpretation.
zakyman
offline
zakyman
1,627 posts
Peasant

Right, I mean, I know it's freedom of religon, but they're just trying to force Christianity on every single person.


When you live in a majority religious nation, sometimes you will have to put up with things in the government of a religious nature. I see no one complaining about "E Pluribus Unum" so why complain about one line in a pledge to the flag? They are not saying, "WORSHIP JESUS/ALLAH/ADONAI OR YOU WILL BE PUNISHED!!!!!" No, they are simply reaching out to a majority, and trying to not offend a very vocal minority.

However God in it's capitalized form is almost synonymous with the Abrahamic God specifically, which is how it's written in the pledge. So in this form it is favoring one religion over another.


I could just as easily take a Hindu god and capitalize it while just calling it "God." It wouldn't change the meaning.
stephenking
offline
stephenking
2,413 posts
Nomad

When you live in a majority religious nation, sometimes you will have to put up with things in the government of a religious nature. I see no one complaining about "E Pluribus Unum" so why complain about one line in a pledge to the flag? They are not saying, "WORSHIP JESUS/ALLAH/ADONAI OR YOU WILL BE PUNISHED!!!!!" No, they are simply reaching out to a majority, and trying to not offend a very vocal minority.
No, I mean, if you read my post in "Atheism," I didn't say "Under God" in the Pledge, and the teacher pulled me over and yelled at me for not saying it. She is a Born-Again Christian, and I have no problem with that, but pausing to let other people say it is not grounds to get in trouble for. I almost got suspended for some reason. And then, of course, getting in trouble for wearing a t-shirt that just says "Darwin is my homeboy."
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

E Pluribus Unum


....Does not invoke religious connotations.

No, they are simply reaching out to a majority, and trying to not offend a very vocal minority.


Maybe not the de facto itself, but it can certainly be said the commonfolk take it to be their own.
zakyman
offline
zakyman
1,627 posts
Peasant

I didn't say "Under God" in the Pledge, and the teacher pulled me over and yelled at me for not saying it.


That is not the fault of the government though. That is the fault of an overzealous, completely religious teacher who clearly does not know the limits of what she can and cannot do. The government does not rub religion in anyone's face. I would side with you on this one, and probably make a complaint to the office.

....Does not invoke religious connotations.


In English, it means, "In God We Trust." If you are complaining about "under God" in the Pledge, than you should logically have a problem with "In God We Trust" being the US's motto.

And then, of course, getting in trouble for wearing a t-shirt that just says "Darwin is my homeboy."


Sounds like you have a bummer of a school. However, that is something to be looked into by the government, and it is no fault of the government that a school has decided to become completely religious.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

That may have been how it was meant when it was written but I've always viewed it in the general sense. I mean to say that everything is subject to a person's individual interpretation.


I would still disagree with it as it ignores atheists and would appear to exclude pantheists.
By not acknowledging any god, even in a general sense, you can than include everyone's views equally.
master565
offline
master565
4,104 posts
Nomad

In English, it means, "In God We Trust."


No it doesn't? It means "out of many, one."
Freakenstein
offline
Freakenstein
9,504 posts
Jester

In English, it means, "In God We Trust." If you are complaining about "under God" in the Pledge, than you should logically have a problem with "In God We Trust" being the US's motto.


In English, E Pluribus Unum means "Out of many, there is One", which signifies the unified power of the many states. E Pluribus Unum cannot signify The Red Scare's new motto "In God We Trust" when it never surfaced until nearly 200 years later.
stephenking
offline
stephenking
2,413 posts
Nomad

that a school has decided to become completely religious.
Yep, all I have is a handful of likewise Atheist friends that get yelled at every day. I'm trying the office now.
MageGrayWolf
offline
MageGrayWolf
9,462 posts
Farmer

The government does not rub religion in anyone's face.


Except for in the pledge, on money, , in oaths, a courthouse trying to add the ten commandments to it's steps, the creation of blue laws, the fact several states won't allow an atheist to run for office...
stephenking
offline
stephenking
2,413 posts
Nomad

Okay, something just screwed itself up.

the fact several states won't allow an atheist to run for office...


That brings back memories of a close friend of ours that was an Atheist. He ran for mayor, and he would've won, except for Texas Article 1, Section 4:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

Yep.
acmed
offline
acmed
3,517 posts
Nomad

God can mean anything. I don't think it means necessarily mean Christian God, but as in a God of whatever they follow.

But if it means Christian God, you have to understand almost all of America is Christian, and that other religions should just believe that is just the general God.

Dewi1066
offline
Dewi1066
539 posts
Nomad

What we really need is something that explains what God means to different people...

... if only there was a way to check...

Showing 1-15 of 23